Dramatic enough for another presentation, I think.
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/IMGP4776.jpg
Comments welcome
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 4/2/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I;ll compare weight with Cotty at GFM this year.
Later we'll see how much our big body cameras weight.
LOL
Har! I better start pushing down the Yorkshire puddings ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/04 Sun PM 11:49:21 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT Working with Gifs
Thanks.
The files they sent are under 80K. I tried to upres them using the 10%
method, but all i got was worser jags.Good english ,
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/05 Mon AM 12:21:23 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Waitangi Angels
Is this Mrs Who??
http://www.web-options.com/London3/content/_2033343_large.html
Not even first base. 8-) His box is blue, what?
Hi,
Does anyone have any information on Hoya lenses? Not filters - lenses.
Specifically ones with K mounts. I've googled and yahoo-ed, but to no
avail.
Ciao,
Peter in Western Sydney
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
As I understand it Hoya supply the glass that others then make into a
complete lens.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/5/07, Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any information on Hoya lenses? Not filters - lenses.
Specifically ones with K mounts. I've googled and yahoo-ed, but
Very nice John.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/5/07, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dramatic enough for another presentation, I think.
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/IMGP4776.jpg
Comments welcome
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2/5/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks.
The files they sent are under 80K. I tried to upres them using the 10%
method, but all i got was worser jags.Good english , eh.:-)
I hope i can get something a bit higher in res. Its
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/05 Mon AM 10:43:46 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT Working with Gifs
On 2/5/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks.
The files they sent
Reviewing those, wide open at longer focal lengths I saw a small and
easily correctable amount of CA when fitted with the teleconverter,
which just about disappeared 1-2 stops down where I'd normally use
the lens. Without the teleconverter, I see no CA of any significance.
Yes, I'm
Try Tokina, which is owned by Hoya...
DagT
Fra: Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Does anyone have any information on Hoya lenses? Not filters - lenses.
Specifically ones with K mounts. I've googled and yahoo-ed, but to no
avail.
Ciao,
Peter in Western Sydney
--
--
The lines of light, below the horizon, makes it something more than just
another sunset.
I think it needs to be displayed on a dark background to bring out more
details in the shadow.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lovely.
I like the line of lights in the foreground. It would be great if you
could lighten the foreground just a tiny bit to bring up a little
more detailing ... not enough to ruin the effect. :-)
G
On Feb 5, 2007, at 12:05 AM, John Coyle wrote:
Dramatic enough for another presentation,
I understand that there were a few Hoya lenses back in the 70's. Nothing
special, but not crap either.
-Adam
Peter McIntosh wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any information on Hoya lenses? Not filters - lenses.
Specifically ones with K mounts. I've googled and yahoo-ed, but to no
avail.
I don't think Hoya sells lenses under it's own name, they own Tokina.
Peter McIntosh wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any information on Hoya lenses? Not filters - lenses.
Specifically ones with K mounts. I've googled and yahoo-ed, but to no
avail.
Ciao,
Peter in Western Sydney
--
But they used to. Hoya and Tokina only hooked up in the 90's.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
I don't think Hoya sells lenses under it's own name, they own Tokina.
Peter McIntosh wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any information on Hoya lenses? Not filters - lenses.
Specifically ones with K
In a message dated 2/4/2007 9:52:10 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Feb 4, 2007, at 8:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/VEGETABLES/
They're all good, Marnie, but I'm particular for the Carrots. :-)
Godfrey
==
Thanks,
In a message dated 2/4/2007 10:32:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And now, just to be *slightly* on-topic, here's a new PESO, the latest
version of my Live Oak BW conversion:
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
Not quite there yet, but I find it's best to make some
Normally I'd point to Monahans Medium Format Megasite, but it seems to
have been abandoned. It maintained the * Third Party Lenses Resource
Megasite Home Page with *quite a few legacy pages about 3rd party 35mm
lenses. I was able to find it in the Wayback Machine and here is it's
2004
http://www.photodo.com/product_332.html
In anticipation of the new DA* lenses major Pentax retailer in Estonia
has dropped the price for older FA and FA J lenses by 40%. Does anyone
have an example photos made with this 28-105 lense I'm planning to
purchase. A comments from your personal
Roman, I suggest you take very careful approach towards this lens. I
had one sample that would display focus confirmation in the viewfinder
of my *istD but no, I repeat no, element of the picture was actually
in focus.
Evidently the sample variation is very significant. Thus I suggest you
insist
I have heard ther's a setting somewhere that will allow for exposing
according to ISO 3200.
I can't find anything in the manual. Is this true? How?
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
The rumor has it that in the future Pentax will release a camera micro
code that will enable both ISO 50 and ISO 3200 'cause one of the beta
versions had it. Currently we're confined to 100-1600 range.
Cheers.
On 2/5/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have heard ther's a setting
I owned that lens and used it quite a bit with my *istD. I sold it after
purchasing the DA 16-45 and the DA 50-200, because I wasn't using it any more.
But it performed quite well. Here are two examples:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2399802size=lg
I agree with Boris. Make sure that you can test it or at leat return it if it
doesn't work properly.
My unit worked perfectly with my MZ-5n. Hovewer, with my Ds it would hunt and
lots of times refuse to focus at the long end (105mm). When it focused the
images came out well though.
-
Try Tokina, which is owned by Hoya...
DagT
-
There was much discussion of this at dpreview some time ago. The gist
was that Tokina is not owned by Hoya. But they jointly market together,
at least in the U.S., with Kenko (THK).
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
When I went to visit my father's home town last October, I also wanted to
get some shots of Mt. Shasta. Scott Valley, where I went, is NW of Shasta.
So wouldn't you know it had been a very dry year and there was practically
no snow?
Taking shots of Shasta was the only time I went out of
Oh yeah, dramatic enough. Very nice with the bridge lights filling in
the dark area on the lower left. Thanks for sharing this one.
--
Bruce
Monday, February 5, 2007, 12:05:23 AM, you wrote:
JC Dramatic enough for another presentation, I think.
JC http://www.members.iinet.net.au/[EMAIL
Indeed, Jaume, apparently different cameras manage to focus this lens
with a different degree of success.
On 2/5/07, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Boris. Make sure that you can test it or at leat return it if it
doesn't work properly.
My unit worked perfectly with my
From The Astronomy Picture of the Day page, here is a really great
image of McNaught -- and other attractions in the sky:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070205.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Should it be the Chicago Lambs now?
Dan M
On 2/4/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK kiddies, I know this is an international list, but the Chicago
Bears will start playing the Indianapolis Colts within the hour. We
are all excited here in Chicago, even the Lions in front of the Art
Jaume, glad you like this. I knew it was a bit tricky to submit a
cormorants picture ..
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jaume Lahuerta
Sent: 04 February, 2007 11:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: February 2007 PUG
Well, my K10D likes my FA100-300 pretty much. IMO, better than Sigma DL
70-300 (I have the legendary first version, that has macro only at
300mm). Quite a capable lens fo the price I paid.
BR, Margus
Scott Loveless wrote:
A little birdie just dropped off a big lens (F100-300). So I stuck
Totally like it! Foreground, cloud position and shape, nice.
If you'd like me to take one with snow on it and send it to you, let me
know. BG It's about three hours north of us.
We've driven over west a bit from the mountain to a lake and taken a
shot or two, but not from huge Lake Shasta it's
Hello Roman,
Monday, February 5, 2007, 6:05:03 PM, you wrote:
http://www.photodo.com/product_332.html
In anticipation of the new DA* lenses major Pentax retailer in Estonia
has dropped the price for older FA and FA J lenses by 40%. Does anyone
have an example photos made with this 28-105
I had one of the FA28-105/3.2-4.5s that I used extensively with the
*ist DS in 2005. I didn't have issues with focusing (it was neither
better or worse than average for AF lenses on the *ist DS) and found
it to be a very good performer most of the time. It is not at its
best wide open, and
I don't get this. What matters (for me) is that the DA does a similar or
better job. The reasons why they do are as interesting as the popes new
beard IMO.
But that's just me ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm considering selling my K 200/2.5. It is KEH bargain shape - the
sliding lens hood is not in very good condition. I just recently sent
it in for CLA and the glass and mechanical functionality is very good.
Just looks used. I thought I'd check and see if there is interest on
the list or not.
Mark, I cannot be certain if it is of any importance, but now I can
successfully access your pages from my home PC. Nice tree by the way.
Boris
Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, after 24-or-so hours of work I have my web site up and running on a
new host... mostly. My former host lost connectivity on
In a message dated 2/5/2007 10:23:42 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Totally like it! Foreground, cloud position and shape, nice.
If you'd like me to take one with snow on it and send it to you, let me
know. BG It's about three hours north of us.
We've driven over west a
It is a nice shot, nonetheless. The location is quite nice. A bit
more dramatic sky or lighting wouldn't hurt, but under the
circumstances, you did good.
--
Bruce
Monday, February 5, 2007, 9:03:09 AM, you wrote:
Eac When I went to visit my father's home town last October, I also wanted to
On 2/5/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
Good stuff. This one is almost as amusing (warning: Pentax content).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSnc36z4m0A
--
Scott Loveless
I'm interested but I probably can't afford it, what are you asking?
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm considering selling my K 200/2.5. It is KEH bargain shape - the
sliding lens hood is not in very good condition. I just recently sent
it in for CLA and the glass and mechanical functionality is very
I rarely used long lenses but I got a K10D a DA18-55, DA 50-200, FA43Ltd and
a F28/2.8 and went to India for the month of January. I found myself using
the 28 and the 50-200 more than the other lenses. I am very pleased with the
50-200 results. It is very sharp, and with SR, the 5.6 limit isn't
That is funny. Have you posted it to a Canon list?
William Robb wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
William Robb
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise
I guess I wasn't clear enough, the DAs do a similar
or better job than many FF lenses, but ONLY on APS cameras. Point is
when you
go to full frame, a lens only has to be 2/3 as
sharp as a DA lens is in lp/mm resolution to
match the DA lens on APS for resolution. And I bet there are
a whole bunch
In a message dated 2/5/2007 11:08:19 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is a nice shot, nonetheless. The location is quite nice. A bit
more dramatic sky or lighting wouldn't hurt, but under the
circumstances, you did good.
--
Bruce
==
Thanks, Bruce.
Marnie
Sorry Tim, but I didn't know where you were going with the 1500 slides.
I've seen some recommendations in the area of 20 to 30 minutes, as to the
timing for a continuous showing of slides alone. If they are to support an
oral presentation longer timing would be ok.
Kenneth Waller
-
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: On the subject of Canons
That is funny. Have you posted it to a Canon list?
It was posted to the Canon forum at dpreview. We'll see how long before Phil
pulls it for denigrating his sponsor.
William Robb
Ping! thanks !
if I only had a brain
doesn't look like Markus applied either though - at least not on my monitor
ann
P. J. Alling wrote:
Cyanotype.
ann sanfedele wrote:
LIke the photo - looks black and white to me -- not sepia toned. Or
did you just mean should I sepia tone it?
You
That one's just bizarre.
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/5/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
Good stuff. This one is almost as amusing (warning: Pentax content).
When there exists a FF Pentax digital SLR to work with, I'll
consider what turd to polish and whether it looks more lovely.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
This is the sort of info I was looking for. I probably should have
added that I was interested in 35mm lenses. As I thought, not a recent
thing.
Interesting - I hadn't come across the wayback machine before. Quite
handy! Many thanks!
Ciao,
Peter
P. J. Alling wrote:
Normally I'd
But you wont be able to if you traded away all your Pentax
FF lenses for DA lenses will you without buying them
all over again!
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 2:41 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss
http://flickr.com/photos/mawz/379303184/
larger, and for the flickr-phobic:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/126/379303184_f52da1c04d_b.jpg
This was the F801, 20/2.8 AF and Silvertone [EMAIL PROTECTED] in FG-7.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The Pope has a new beard? Why am I always the last to know?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
Sent: 05 February 2007 18:33
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
I don't get this. What
I had a Hoya 135mm lens in K-mount in the early 1980s. It wasn't crap,
it was shit.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam Maas
Sent: 05 February 2007 14:50
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Hoya lenses
I
Our four year old (I'm nearly five Dad!) had her very first day of school
yesterday.
This was captured in an unguarded moment with the M50mm f1.7 wide open. I
have also softened it a bit in photoshop.
http://tinyurl.com/2leo5e
Comments and critique welcome.
Cheers
James Messervy
--
Too bad you'll never know how much fun this is creating (for me)
amongst a nest of Canon users and a fever pitched Canon dealer.
THANK YOU!!
Smiling Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Darned - I do lots of ISO 3200 shots. I don't like flash photography a lot.
Not pretty - and it disturbs the subject a lot. Sometimes so much, I cant
take pictures. I guess I could underexpose by one stop. If I shoot Raw)DGN
it's probably OK to brighten up later.
Thanks anywasy for answering,
On 5/2/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I had a Hoya 135mm lens in K-mount in the early 1980s. It wasn't crap,
it was shit.
Thanks Bob. I needed that :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 5/2/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
That is funny. Have you posted it to a Canon list?
It was posted to the Canon forum at dpreview. We'll see how long before Phil
pulls it for denigrating his sponsor.
I just put it up on the EOS list ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 11:27 AM
Subject: More HDR heavy handedness on dpreview
K10D HDR
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=21629339
--
If a new camera that requires new lenses comes out, I'll decide
whether to buy it and whatever new lenses I need for it at that time.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 5/2/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
LOL
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 2/5/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://flickr.com/photos/mawz/379303184/
larger, and for the flickr-phobic:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/126/379303184_f52da1c04d_b.jpg
This was the F801, 20/2.8 AF and Silvertone [EMAIL PROTECTED] in FG-7.
-Adam
Cool photo. Did you get
On 2/05/07 3:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a new camera that requires new lenses comes out, I'll decide
whether to buy it and whatever new lenses I need for it at that time.
Of course everybody here thinks so, but saying so will turn everybody off
too, Godfrey :-). It's
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: K10D @ ISO 3200
Darned - I do lots of ISO 3200 shots. I don't like flash photography a
lot.
Not pretty - and it disturbs the subject a lot. Sometimes so much, I
cant
take pictures. I guess I could underexpose by one stop. If I
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
The Pope has a new beard? Why am I always the last to know?
Yer probably an Anglican.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: K.Takeshita
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
If a new camera that requires new lenses comes out, I'll decide
whether to buy it and whatever new lenses I need for it at that time.
Of course everybody here thinks so, but saying so will turn everybody
off
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
But you wont be able to if you traded away all your Pentax
FF lenses for DA lenses will you without buying them
all over again!
You are, of course, presuming that there is a 24x36mm sensor in a K mount
Darned - I do lots of ISO 3200 shots. I don't like flash photography a
lot. Not pretty - and it disturbs the subject a lot. Sometimes so
much, I
cant take pictures. I guess I could underexpose by one stop. If I
shoot Raw)DGN
it's probably OK to brighten up later.
Whatever did you do
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/5/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://flickr.com/photos/mawz/379303184/
larger, and for the flickr-phobic:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/126/379303184_f52da1c04d_b.jpg
This was the F801, 20/2.8 AF and Silvertone [EMAIL PROTECTED] in FG-7.
-Adam
William Robb wrote:
The future will look out for itself, and I'll reckon with it when I need
to.
:-)
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Date: Mon, 5 Feb
On 2/5/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work just around the corner from the Gooderham Flatiron, in fact I was
just walking out of the Wendy's while on lunch when I shot this.
The Edwal is interesting. I'm not entirely sold on it, but it's the only
way to get workable results at 800
Markus Maurer wrote:
Part of an old water barrage for the river Limmat in Zurich are some nice
looking gearwheels:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5540576size=lg (251kb)
Markus, I do like this a lot: the interplay of light, shadow and color,
as well as the fine detail
The Pope has a new beard? Why am I always the last to know?
Yer probably an Anglican.
I'm half Catholic. They should at least tell me about his moustache.
--
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
A very poignant moment caught. I like your presentation, too. Nice
work!
--
Bruce
Monday, February 5, 2007, 12:47:06 PM, you wrote:
JaKM Our four year old (I'm nearly five Dad!) had her very first day of school
JaKM yesterday.
JaKM This was captured in an unguarded moment with the M50mm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/05.htm
hmm, my notebook display is 1024x768 so I can see the (bigger) picture
in two parts. Upper part is not my cup of tea (looks overexposed and
blurry in the corners), but one PgDn later things look quite
different. So all I can say is that I
Welcome to Santa Monica...
Norm
William Robb wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks for the comments, guys. As suggested by Godfrey, I've adjusted the
image to lighten the foreground.
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/IMGP4776A.jpg
I'd forgotten to include the technical details, for those who are
interested:
Pentax *ist-D, Sigma 18-35/3.5-4.5 at 18mm
I'm looking forward only to the 50.
J
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darned - I do lots of ISO 3200 shots. I don't like flash
photography a
lot. Not pretty - and it disturbs the subject a lot. Sometimes so
much, I
cant take pictures. I guess I could underexpose by
I cant comment on that one, but I think hoya HMC
and tokina RMC lenses are the same thing and I have
several Hoya HMC/ Tokina RMC lenses that are excellent. They made
a really good 28-85 F4, 35-105 F3.5 and 100-300 F5.6
that were identical looking to the tokina RMC versions
and like I said,
Does anybody know if and where this thing (called Tatamy Stick in Japan) is
sold in North America?
http://shop.pentax.jp/shop/goods/goods.aspx?goods=39357
It is made (offered) by Pentax and used by their Service Dep't when dust is
sticky to be removed by normal DR action.
People who used it
Your missing the point once again, a FF camera
wont need all new lenses to beat the best DA/APS
camera combinations. thats the whole advantage of
FF, its nowhere near as critical on lens quality
as APS is to get same or better quality than best
aps possible. Of course better lenses wont hurt,
but
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 01:27:22PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Darned - I do lots of ISO 3200 shots. I don't like flash photography a
lot. Not pretty - and it disturbs the subject a lot. Sometimes so
much, I
cant take pictures. I guess I could underexpose by one stop. If I
shoot
Hello,
I've been playing with some test pictures taken with FA-J 18-35 and this
is the result - my first BW conversion:
http://picasaweb.google.com/placus/Pentax/photo?authkey=3N71J2CknRo#5028174232879468002
for comparison the color version is here:
Nah. Try:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAU-8
rg
On 2/4/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still wimpy, Russian, (WWII), 50 caliber antitank rifle round.
K.Takeshita wrote:
On 2/03/07 5:38 PM, mike wilson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/02/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been too busy with grad school to be posting / responding on PDML.
But later I may get my priorities back in order. :)
Anyway, things have been outrageous lately on eBay. Seen those 1.7x
units? WOW!
So, in that vein, I've got something that will go for a *reasonable* price.
A black MX,
Bill,
I rarely used long lenses but I got a K10D a DA18-55, DA 50-200, FA43Ltd and
a F28/2.8 and went to India for the month of January. I found myself using
the 28 and the 50-200 more than the other lenses. I am very pleased with the
50-200 results. It is very sharp, and with SR, the 5.6
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/05.htm
Thanks to all who sent comments!
On Feb 5, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Peter Lacus wrote:
hmm, my notebook display is 1024x768 so I can see the (bigger) picture
in two parts. Upper part is not my cup of tea (looks overexposed and
blurry in the
That rendering does a better job, IMO.
Good stuff!
G
On Feb 5, 2007, at 2:03 PM, John Coyle wrote:
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/IMGP4776A.jpg
Pentax *ist-D, Sigma 18-35/3.5-4.5 at 18mm and f4.5, 1/60sec @ 200ASA.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Fairly powerful image. Sky suits the contrast and subject particularly
well.
Print has a slightly scratchy feel about it. If it's your chosen
style, I think it works nicely with this subject.
Prefer the BW.
Jack
--- Peter Lacus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've been playing with some test
This is getting silly, but didn't I give you a salvo of 18 inch naval guns?
That should do, period :-).
Ken
On 2/05/07 5:52 PM, Gonz, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nah. Try:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAU-8
rg
On 2/4/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still wimpy, Russian,
While surfing I came across Tom Stoddart's site again - I haven't
looked at it for a while. Stoddart is an English photojournalist of
the very highest calibre, and you're probably familiar with some of
his photos, but if you haven't seen his website it's well worth a
detour.
There's some
The BW has a lot more character compared to the color rendering in
this instance. Nice job: I like the deep tones.
I've heard rather variable comments about the FA-J 18-35.
G
On Feb 5, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Peter Lacus wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/placus/Pentax/photo?
On 2/05/07 6:03 PM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is getting silly, but didn't I give you a salvo of 18 inch naval guns?
That should do, period :-).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 2/05/07 6:03 PM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is getting silly, but didn't I give you a salvo of 18 inch naval guns?
That should do, period :-).
Just to satisfy the curiosity of some, and for the heck of it, this is a pic
of 18 inch cannon whose length is over 7 feet, reaching
This was captured in an unguarded moment with the M50mm f1.7 wide open. I
have also softened it a bit in photoshop.
http://tinyurl.com/2leo5e
good eye, James. And first class craftmanship as well.
BTW: I found your message right in the middle of a thread about whether
are DA lenses
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
