From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:32:52 +0800
On 10/20/07, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The market changes fast. I think Pentax missed the mark with the 645D.
If
it was released 2 years ago it might have had a chance.
No chance at all. It would have been far too expensive. Only when the cost
is right will a 645D
And now, let's discuss WWII planes with a quiz for warbird buffs
out there.
Please take a look at www.dariobonazza.com/public/KGP03047.jpg
What's that?
Ciao,
Dario
Is it a Yak-9?
Evan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
SMELL.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Moonrise
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
If you are in such areas, how would I know? ;-))
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL
And just who will buy it at $999 when it can be had for $599? I want to meet
those people, because I have some items in my garage I'd like to get rid of.
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not exactly free fall, you can find it for $599, (after rebate), but a
lot of places are
testtesttesttesttesttesttesttesttest
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Sorry if some of these come through twice. Weather made my satellite
connection spotty and they don't appear to have reached the archives
either...
Comments below:
Tom C.
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I like the ethereal look of the rocks and the light. I find the foregound
confuses my eye though and I think the person is small and soft which tends
to detract.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Pentax basically ignored the 35mm market for several decades and did have a
respectable MF presence. Where has that gotten them to today?
Tom C.
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from
Likely sometime in the next two years, you'll get duplicate posts when
hotmail gets around to actually sending. Sorry for the duplicates
that may arrive.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
From: Stan Halpin
I have had generally good success with both. Adorama has tended to
have better selection of Pentax gear in the last few years. What got
me steamed about my recent experience is that they arbitrarily
cancelled my order and, even worse in my mind, did not let me know. I
was
ann sanfedele
that what you see on the monitor that
magenta streak, can come from a kind of eye problem whose name I don't
know... but of course,
Yeah, it must be an eye problem - I only see the magenta streak when looking
@ that image.
where is the streak you see? do you still see it?
As
The same people who will spend twice list price for used equipment on
e-Bay that is still available new through BH and Adorama. What is e-Bay
if not the ultimate garage sale?
Tom C wrote:
And just who will buy it at $999 when it can be had for $599? I want
to meet those people, because I
Is there any camera on the market that has a 1.2/1.3 crop at the moment? It
would not make sense to me to shoot for somewhere between APS-C and FF. You
wouldn't *need* new lenses of course...
Tom C.
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To:
Comments below:
Tom C.
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:05:53 +0200
Tom Wrote:
Are you sure those
Thanks Paul - It was just worth waiting with the price difference and the
additional import penalty I would have been hit with.
It is great that any purchase under AU$1000 is not subject to 10% GST. GST
is like a US state sales tax essentially but it hurts when you just go over
the I grand and
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:21:49PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
I can't see non-645 owners jumping to a 645D in masses.
The 645D would be a low volume seller compared to a 24 x 36 FF body. . .
That's a big assumption; I'm by no means convinced you are right.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Comments below:
Tom C.
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:05:53 +0200
Tom Wrote:
Are you sure those
Bob Blakely wrote:
No, but it's where I'm going to get some of my money. Careful choice of the
best of the most desired has made the value of my collection grow over the
years. If you buy the good stuff that everyone covets, you don't loose, it
grows in value.
True, but I won't sell some
Kenneth Waller wrote:
ann sanfedele
that what you see on the monitor that
magenta streak, can come from a kind of eye problem whose name I don't
know... but of course,
Yeah, it must be an eye problem - I only see the magenta streak when looking
@ that image.
LOL!
321 Ka BOOM
Tom C wrote:
123
Tom C.
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
failfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfail
Tom C wrote:
testtesttesttesttesttesttesttesttest
Tom C.
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Ken,
I don't see it on my laptop.
Perhaps it is an artifact on your screen???
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/19/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ann sanfedele
that what you see on the monitor that
magenta streak, can come from a kind of eye problem whose name I don't
know... but of
From: Dario Bonazza
And now, let's discuss WWII planes with a quiz for warbird buffs out there.
Please take a look at www.dariobonazza.com/public/KGP03047.jpg
What's that?
P-51B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
I recommend ~35mm to 50mm lens for 35mm cameras, ~20mm to 35mm for APS size
sensors to catch some sky, as you can't predict exactly where the trails
will appear. Must be on tripod. No point in having any of the ground in the
shot, unless for effect. NO LIGHTS IN FRAME! Lens should be wide open,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Dayton
Sent: 19 October 2007 22:22
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for
next camera(s)
So where does 'Turd Gnat' fit in the order?
Toralf Lund wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
Roman Melihhov wrote:
I remember how it all started with K10D. Lotta rumors, unrealistic
expectations, [ ... ]
Roman.
Good bet?
12MP, 5fps, improved AF system, ~20 RAW buffer, 1-2 stops better high ISO
noise. ISO200-6400 native. New
If you will look closely, the photo is not tilted - the horizon is
really out at the ocean - it is faint blue but is there.
The seeming tilt is because the beach slopes down towards the ocean
and the body of seems like it should be the horizon. It is deceiving
that it seems like that body of
jtainter wrote:
It's been reported here that the DA lenses generally cover very nearly the
image circle required by 35mm film, so
perhaps they would be perfect for something like 1.3x. Or, I believe someone
talked about 1.2x, too;
-
Some do, some don't.
Don't what exactly?
The
My filter is trained to accept Adorama mail. Your hypothesis is
plausible, but probably wrong. I think they just screwed up.
stan
On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:41 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Stan,
What if Adorama people really did send you an e-mail, but as usual it
might have included some
No, but it's where I'm going to get some of my money. Careful choice of the
best of the most desired has made the value of my collection grow over the
years. If you buy the good stuff that everyone covets, you don't loose, it
grows in value.
Regards,
Bob...
Henry's in downtown Toronto has (last I checked, a day or so ago):
All the DA lenses except the 40 Limited, 2 43 Limiteds, 2 50/1.4's, 2 each of
the D-FA Macro's, 3 16-50's, a 50-135, a half dozen 360 and 540's, a couple
MZ-M's, K10D's, K100D's and K100D Super's galore and a full set of finder
Sorry - missed the Subject line on the original...
On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
The basic kit lens for Pentax digital cameras - good value. This is
essentially unused, in original box etc.
Would make a good companion to the *ist-D I also have up for sale.
Make me an offer
I stopped by a local store (Nelson) here, in San Diego.
I was surprised by the inventory they had for Pentax
K10D, K100D, 16-50/2.8 ($900), 50-135 ($1000), 77/1.8 ($1100),
40/2.8, 50 (?probably macro, f/2.8)...
And this was at their smaller store in La Jolla.
First of all, I was surpised to see
The basic kit lens for Pentax digital cameras - good value. This is
essentially unused, in original box etc.
Would make a good companion to the *ist-D I also have up for sale.
Make me an offer on the lens alone or on the set.
Off list.
Stan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Good news. Ned has dropped in here occasionally. Perhaps we'll see
him again when the program is introduced.
Paul
On Oct 19, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Mark Erickson wrote:
All,
This may have already been discussed, but I think it's pretty
significant.
Ned Bunnell, an occasional poster to the
I agree. And it will make a nice camera paired with the K10D as backup.
Paul
On Oct 19, 2007, at 6:13 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Good bet?
12MP, 5fps, improved AF system, ~20 RAW buffer, 1-2 stops better
high ISO noise. ISO200-6400 native. New shutter with 1/8000 and
1/250 sync.
Possibly
I would have guessed P51 but apparently that's not it.
I'd never heard of the Hispano Aviacion HA 1112 Buchon but I doubt that's it.
The wheels retract away from the fuselage in the photo you posted whereas in
Dario's photo they retract towards the fuselage.
Cheers
Brian
The forest has come to Dunsinane.
-- Original message --
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HAR!
I can see you all rushing for the border with the shrubbery trying to
pretend you're only wild bushes.
Regards,
Bob...
My favorite is Denny Crain.
We get late night TV commercials with him.
Just dial 1-800-My-Right to get your legal problems solved.
Blew me away the first time I saw it!
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/19/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
On 10/20/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I know, even with IS, I can't hand-hold my 300mm F4 and expect
tak-sharp images; much less with the 500.
Give up the
*-ist-D in good condition. LL-60 focusing screen installed but
original screen provided. Will also include 6 CRV3 lithium batteries
and a couple of CF cards.
*-ist-D Battery Grip
K-AC10-U AC power adapter for *ist-D (handy if you are going to use
the camera tethered to your laptop, for
HAR!
I can see you all rushing for the border with the shrubbery trying to
pretend you're only wild bushes.
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original
David Savage wrote:
On 10/20/07, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Nobody knows the size of the MF based digital camera market as no one is
really selling any.
So what makes you think Pentax can do any better than Hassleblad,
Maymia, Leaf etc?
If no one is really selling any now,
I remember how it all started with K10D. Lotta rumors, unrealistic
expectations, even though it can shake itself shame it still doest do
the laundry. At the end it was good tool that does its job well and
helps achieving excellence in photography. Now another round, 12Mp? FF?
1.3x 1.25x crop,
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/_IGP3061_001.jpg
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/20/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look for the plaid jacket in amongst the darkness.
Dave
On 10/19/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are in such areas, how would I know? ;-))
On Oct 19, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Cotty wrote:
The pecking order is
1. Shitbag
2. Fartbag
3. Sleazebag.
Is there a position for smeghead in your hierarchy?
Don't be crude.
Too late.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
mike wilson wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Two things:
1. Unlike your own town, Newcastle is one word. 8-)
I can rationalize that (aside from being miss typo, second only to
Brooks in that area)
I once had an honorable mention in one of the New York
Feds also pay for US highways.
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at
On 10/20/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I know, even with IS, I can't hand-hold my 300mm F4 and expect
tak-sharp images; much less with the 500.
Give up the coke.
Yeah the caffeine in it is doing you no favours.
Cheers,
Dave
--
On 19/10/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I know, even with IS, I can't hand-hold my 300mm F4 and expect
tak-sharp images; much less with the 500.
Give up the coke.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
A few days ago Mike J had a really interesting historical tale of
camera marketing and product lines:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2007/10/in-the-early-19.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 10/20/07, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Nobody knows the size of the MF based digital camera market as no one is
really selling any.
So what makes you think Pentax can do any better than Hassleblad,
Maymia, Leaf etc?
If no one is really selling any now, and the size of the
I don't see the magenta - either the trhee of us are really going blind
or Ken needs a trip to
the eye doctor ;)
I won't deny a trip to the eye doctors would probably help my close distance
focus, but I've never had an issue with color.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
-
On 19/10/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
The pecking order is
1. Shitbag
2. Fartbag
3. Sleazebag.
Is there a position for smeghead in your hierarchy?
Don't be crude.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
- Original Message -
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All true, but BH still list a number of 645 lenses, most in stock.
Pentax's immediate challenge would be some normal and wide-angle 645
lenses, and they already have a new normal lens on the lens map.
The MF lenses are still
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 123mm
ISO 800, 1/3000 sec @ f/4.5, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/ptreyes_0097.htm
I like the light and overall feel. However it feels tilted to my eye
due to the way the foreground and background interact, which is
,,,or douchebag.
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/20/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dirtbag shouldn't be overlooked.
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, you've forgotten the venerable Barfbag !
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've heard that it was designed as a D-FA lens for full-frame coverage
(but optimized for digital with the latest anti-reflective coatings)
and the designation was changed to DA because it has no aperture ring.
On the
Brooks wrote:
DJB http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6544943
DJB The blue jays are getting braver these days and i can now get
about 15' or so away from them.
DJB Taken in the front yard in a bit of drizzle.
DJB K10D, FA 70-200 and cropped a bit in PSCS
And Bruce Dayton
Dirtbag shouldn't be overlooked.
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, you've forgotten the venerable Barfbag !
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about
On 10/19/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Cute cat.
Is'nt this why Mike Johnson left the list. Oh that and flowers.
and guns... cute cat.
Oh ya, forgot. That was my doing i think.
Dave
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML
I wouldn't want to wear it out. Perhaps I'll put in a digital
simulation of a bell to preserve the original... ;-)
G
On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Y. Rowe wrote:
Please, ring it daily!
If I may ring the Luddite bell, relying upon AF for critical focus is
a foolish idea.
--
PDML
mike wilson wrote:
No, it was to avoid sending me his book.
Has it still not arrived yet? Have you sent it a birthday card?
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On 10/18/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
I've never dealt with Adorama. For some reason, they've always seemed
a rather odd outfit to me. The folks at BH get most of my business.
I've dealt with both. There's not a fig's worth of difference between them.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's reportedly optimized for the 1.5 image circle. Whether it will
cover full frame is another matter, but I'd expect some softness and
vignetting at the corners.
I've heard that it was designed as a D-FA lens for full-frame coverage
(but optimized for digital with
I forgot to comment on this one before. It's a really nice shot and
this later rendering looks better than as first displayed.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/ptreyes_0137a.htm
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yes, some places haven't caught up with reality. But it's $599 after rebate
from BH, and if they won't price-match, just order from BH.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
Not exactly free fall, you can find it for $599, (after rebate), but a
lot of places are still selling it for 999 or more.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Taken at the beach at Pt. Reyes - The sun was near setting and caused
the soft glow depicted.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 123mm
ISO 800, 1/3000 sec @ f/4.5, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/ptreyes_0097.htm
Beautiful shot, Bruce. You can't go wrong with
Ah, you've forgotten the venerable Barfbag !
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Cotty wrote:
On 19/10/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
645 bodies and lenses are gone from the Pentaximaging web site. If the
645d does return it will be a large scale New Product introduction.
Something I don't think Pentax has the chutzpah to carry off. Nor do I
think they have the production capacity to meet any kind of real demand
for new 645
On 10/19/07, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS: Not that the Canadians are going to nuke us:-). But there are
some leaks up there in the great northern expanses.
Don't know 'bout that. They do have about 90% of their population massed
within 75
The center of a lens has always been optimized for the center of the image
circle it projects. :-)
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Mark Erickson wrote:
All,
This may have already been discussed, but I think it's pretty
significant.
Ned Bunnell, an occasional poster to the Pentax forum over at
DPReview, was
recently promoted to President of
Mark Erickson wrote:
All,
This may have already been discussed, but I think it's pretty significant.
Ned Bunnell, an occasional poster to the Pentax forum over at DPReview, was
recently promoted to President of Pentax Imaging in the USA. There's a nice
congratulations thread over at
I agree. And I also noticed that the true horizon isn't rotated. It's
a Gordian Knot.
Paul
On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I didn't say that the photo was rotated (although it might be).
It just give me a sensation that it is due to the strong, sloping
foreground lines.
At 3:03 PM -0700 10/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This weekend the Orionid meteor shower will be going on. Sunday is also my
birthday, so since I'm going to be staying up late anyway, I figure I might as
well go out and shoot some shooting stars.
What are good settings for shooting such
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 123mm
ISO 800, 1/3000 sec @ f/4.5, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/ptreyes_0097.htm
I like the light and overall feel. However it feels tilted to my eye
due to the way the foreground
It's ok... I've hunted for it with a sampler and can't find it.
But if you see it, I suppose it's there somehow. Very odd.
Godfrey
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/43.htm
As I stated in my original response, the very slight magenta
streak runs
from the ULH side to the LRH
It's been reported here that the DA lenses generally cover very nearly the
image circle required by 35mm film, so
perhaps they would be perfect for something like 1.3x. Or, I believe someone
talked about 1.2x, too;
-
Some do, some don't.
Speaking only for my own preferences and cognitive
On 10/20/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
The Canadians. They walk among us. William Shatner. Michael J. Fox.
Monty Hall. Mike Meyers. Alex Trebek. All of them Canadians. All of
Cute. But my burning question is:
Did anyone try to make a photocopy of it?
Cheers,
Dave :-)
On 10/19/07, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two disclaimers:
1. Not Pentax
2. Not Art. Just aaaw
..and one warning: Adorable kitten!
With all that out of the way...
On 10/19/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of them jokes or comics. Well except for Fox who qualifies as a
tragic figure now. (The sad part is the most admirable of your examples
is a game show host). Yep I've set it up come on and hit the hanger...
Other than WW, Alex is the only
I'm sorry, I thought that was WW saying that.
mike wilson wrote:
San Jose is in Canada? You learn sooo many new things here.
Must tell Google Earth.
P. J. Alling wrote:
He's in Canada, they'll farm it out to the Mounties.
mike wilson wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL
P. J. Alling wrote:
Doesn't look very sharp to me ;-)
Oh damn! I'll hit it with USM a few times, OK?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I've seen a lot of Photographers using the signature mask technique on
their work lately. True a real signed work should be personal, but in
most cases they're just doing as an alternative to copyright printing on
the image.
ann sanfedele wrote:
Jens Bladt wrote:
Interesting question.
It's reportedly optimized for the 1.5 image circle. Whether it will cover
full frame is another matter, but I'd expect some softness and vignetting at
the corners.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It
Cotty wrote:
On 19/10/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought Cotty was the only one able to bestow shitbag status on a list
member. I'm feeling that my exclusive club is becoming over run with
pseudo-shitbags.
The pecking order is
1. Shitbag
2. Fartbag
3. Sleazebag.
On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:23 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
I don't see the magenta - either the trhee of us are really going
blind
or Ken needs a trip to the eye doctor ;)
Well, at very least I'm not an old blind republican. Two out of three
aint bad though. ]'-)
godders, this isn't my kind of
Might be Bruce. This is the one that was smashed up, and i had
repaired. Its also a slow shutter speed even at iso 800, so there
could be some motion blur. I
I have several squirrel pictures from today, that look sharp.
Dave
On 10/19/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The color and pose
I've never dealt with Adorama. For some reason, they've always seemed
a rather odd outfit to me. The folks at BH get most of my business.
Godfrey
-
Adorama are honest, but definitely odd and frequently inept. Often the right
hand does not talk to the left.
In recent years, Adorama has
Cute cat.
Is'nt this why Mike Johnson left the list. Oh that and flowers.
LOL
Dave
On 10/19/07, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two disclaimers:
1. Not Pentax
2. Not Art. Just aaaw
..and one warning: Adorable kitten!
With all that out of the way...
The color and pose are nice, but it lacks the snap are sharpness that
we are getting accustomed to seeing with Christian's Uber-Lens. The
backgrounds is nicely blurred but the subject is a little too soft. I
don't know if it is an issue with the lens itself or what.
--
Bruce
Friday, October
On Oct 19, 2007, at 12:04, Bob Blakely wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS: Not that the Canadians are going to nuke us:-). But there are
some leaks up there in the great northern expanses.
Don't know 'bout that. They do have about 90% of their population
massed
within 75
Bruce,
This version does render much cleaner. A beautiful image and composition!
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Moonrise
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:47:19 -0700
Just got
He's in Canada, they'll farm it out to the Mounties.
mike wilson wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Presidents should simply commit hara-kiri when their approval rating
falls below 20% and make way for the next joker. GWB could be a
leader and show the way ...
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS: Not that the Canadians are going to nuke us:-). But there are
some leaks up there in the great northern expanses.
Don't know 'bout that. They do have about 90% of their population massed
within 75 miles of our border. I think they're preparing to
and, uh, make that Newcastle so I don't offend the Brits :)
Finally
SIGNS GONE BY is in good shape and on sale here:
http://www.lulu.com/content/1228584
also, son of sign language the black and white calendar is here:
http://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff.179091525
I went with the
Dreaming? It was only a dream?
well I sure as heck will not be switching over to another camera type. ;)
rg2
On 10/19/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure those lenses are in production? Designed maybe, but I would
think otherwise in the same status as the 645D. They're not
Are you sure those lenses are in production? Designed maybe, but I would
think otherwise in the same status as the 645D. They're not making lenses
for a camera that's not on the production line.
I'm not expecting it or holding my breath, but to me it makes *more sense*
to produce a FF 24 X
101 - 200 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
