On Dec 15, 2007 4:18 AM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
London commuters can be rather reserved sometimes:
http://www.web-options.com/IMAGE_00010s.jpg
She looks surprised at having here picture taken
Also, did you do much PP on this one? She looks a little plasticy.
I wouldn't
Put it in a box with activated charcoal (maybe the inserts for shoes
could work, some have activated charcoal inside). Oxygen from
hydrogenperoxide should also work but it would also generate a fine
mist of hydrogen peroxide which get's inside the camera.
Or simply heat (100W lightbulb in a box),
There's one or two dreamers on the list who will enjoy these...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/07/
business_aston_martin0s_new_design_centre/html/1.stm
http://tinyurl.com/2948mx
(car pics)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
I'm not surprised. What's that strange beam of light emanating from
his trousers?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Womer
Sent: 15 December 2007 03:58
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Seattle Strange
This guy was
On Dec 15, 2007 6:10 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not surprised. What's that strange beam of light emanating from
his trousers?
I see your schwartz is as big as mine. Let's see how well you handle it
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
There's one or two dreamers on the list who will enjoy these...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/07/
business_aston_martin0s_new_design_centre/html/1.stm
http://tinyurl.com/2948mx
(car pics)
Oh boy. Cold shower time for me.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see his Schwartz is as big as mine
D
Bob W wrote:
I'm not surprised. What's that strange beam of light emanating from
his trousers?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Womer
Sent: 15 December 2007 03:58
David Savage wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 6:10 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not surprised. What's that strange beam of light emanating from
his trousers?
I see your schwartz is as big as mine. Let's see how well you handle it
Cheers,
Dave
Argh, beat me to it. You are a
Bruce Dayton wrote:
You may be right - what I have seen lately is similar. Dramatic
landscapes or major wildlife (600/4 territory) seem to dominate these
days. People, slice of life and such don't seem to do very well. My
hit rate these days is down to about 1 in 30 - even though I have
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Here are the current counts for the categories:
Let's sort them:
Nature - 1077
Landscapes - 907
Travel - 474 (mostly nature/landscape again)
Cityscape/Urban - 466 (sort of landscape, isn't it?)
Macro - 464 (mostly nature again)
Wildlife - 446 (again)
Total for
I can attest it is a very good lens. I have one (HSM version for the
Nikon AF mount) and it is nearly as good as the Pentax FA 80-200 mm. 2.8
I also have, being the only advantages of the Pentax better contrast and
a little more sharpness wide open.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
You have a dirty mind, Savage...
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 6:10 PM, Bob W
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not surprised. What's that strange beam of
light emanating from
his trousers?
I see your schwartz is as big as mine. Let's see
how well you handle it
I agree with Paul here. I use to just use the Adobe Gamma settings and
my prints we're only about 90% of what they looked like on the
monitor. After buying Marks old Spyder unit and disk's and turning off
AG my prints are 98-99% of the monitor.
Even when using the Proof set to Working CMYK, i was
The slant may tend to reflect the ratio of submissions. The
acceptance, as a percentage of offerings, is an unknown.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the current counts for the categories:
Abstract - 283
BW - 292
Cityscape/Urban - 466
Documentary - 295
Food - 67
On Dec 14, 2007 11:46 PM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck,
Describe each lens like SMC Takumar 135 f3.5 in whatever condition
with clean glass. (or Super Takumar, or...)
Add a good picture of the front and one from the side.
End the auction on a Sunday if you can...
There is
Dave,
Careful now, my second biggest collection of unused equipment is
Pentax screwmount! ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Dec 15, 2007 8:09 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 11:46 PM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck,
Describe each lens like SMC Takumar 135 f3.5
One of the cars given away in the Princess Margaret Hospitals lottery
the other day was an A ston Martin. Not sure which one.
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 4:02 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's one or two dreamers on the list who will enjoy these...
On Dec 15, 2007 9:46 AM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
Careful now, my second biggest collection of unused equipment is
Pentax screwmount! ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
Mine to Bob, it was a feeble attempt at early morning, waiting for the
big snowstorm humour.
:-)
Dave
On Dec 15,
I have recently submitted 3 landscape shots, all we're rejected in
about 4-5 days or so.
I submitted another today, landscape/BW themes, so we'll see.
Although the four pictures that did make it, we're submitted early and
most likely accepted on a we may not get a lot of response feelings,
are
Not sure if i commented on the shot Bruce, but if viewing on the photo
gallery would have given it a thumbs up.
Its the kid to the left that helps make the photo IMO
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 1:03 AM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might expect that of the final judges, but the peer
On Dec 14, 2007 6:15 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: Commuting
London commuters can be rather reserved sometimes:
http://www.web-options.com/IMAGE_00010s.jpg
What's Cotty's girlfriend doing on that bus?
Was'nt she the
I agree. No matter the subject, there is no question that it's much
more difficult to get an image accepted now than was the case in the
beginning.
Not disagreeing with Paul that there may be a genre sensitive policy in
place, but it's clear that landscapes bounce back as declined freely
and with
G'day All,
Same scene as Wall of Weeds (different position) but with an extra
element (~105kb)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2160/2105969996_138f6e5141_o.jpg
K10D, DA*16-50 f2.8, f13 @ 15 seconds, flash in hand, fired manually.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
My last set of submissions had a 25% success rate.
2x landscapes (both declined)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_sml.jpg
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9690.jpg
1x Action/sport/people (declined)
Dave, What is the 'ghost' down in the lower right?
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Same scene as Wall of Weeds (different position) but with an extra
element (~105kb)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2160/2105969996_138f6e5141_o.jpg
K10D, DA*16-50 f2.8, f13 @
Sorry, Cotty, but I am not one of those guy. Nice photos though.
Cheers!
Boris
Cotty wrote:
There's one or two dreamers on the list who will enjoy these...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/07/
business_aston_martin0s_new_design_centre/html/1.stm
http://tinyurl.com/2948mx
It's the same pixie that's on the left :-)
Clue: Pixie, 15 second exposure, 2 bursts of lowish powered flash fired manually
Cheers,
Dave
On Dec 16, 2007 12:46 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, What is the 'ghost' down in the lower right?
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL
Really, I'd rather drop it off at a charity shop than go thru the
ebay hassles.
Just looking to unload it on someone who would use it.
Not looking for the earth here. Sorry to be a bother
and all.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Baiter?
Derby Chang wrote:
David Savage wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 6:10 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not surprised. What's that strange beam of light emanating from
his trousers?
I see your schwartz is as big as mine. Let's see how well you handle it
Well, I would certainly use it. Right now i have my P30t ... and my P30t :/
Really, I'd rather drop it off at a charity shop than go thru the
ebay hassles.
Just looking to unload it on someone who would use it.
Not looking for the earth here. Sorry to be a bother
and all.
--
PDML
On Dec 16, 2007 12:01 AM, chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really, I'd rather drop it off at a charity shop than go thru the
ebay hassles.
Just looking to unload it on someone who would use it.
If you want to give it away, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on another
list I subscribe to. He's a high school
I'd use it, but I'm not close enough for a simple drop-off. Try your
local schools or www.freecycle.org
Cheers,
Paul
chuck wrote:
Really, I'd rather drop it off at a charity shop than go thru the
ebay hassles.
Just looking to unload it on someone who would use it.
Not looking for the
I like this very much. I might bring up the shadow detail just a wee
bit with shadow/highlights or an RGB curve. Of course you wouldn't
want to brighten it overall. Good work.
Paul
On Dec 15, 2007, at 10:32 AM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Same scene as Wall of Weeds (different position)
Didn't notice those at first glance. But I'd try to clone them out.
Paul
On Dec 15, 2007, at 11:00 AM, David Savage wrote:
It's the same pixie that's on the left :-)
Clue: Pixie, 15 second exposure, 2 bursts of lowish powered flash
fired manually
Cheers,
Dave
On Dec 16, 2007 12:46
On 15/12/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Didn't notice those at first glance. But I'd try to clone them out.
I thought it was part of his copyright tag ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Clone tool!
Jack :)
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the same pixie that's on the left :-)
Clue: Pixie, 15 second exposure, 2 bursts of lowish powered flash
fired manually
Cheers,
Dave
On Dec 16, 2007 12:46 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, What is
On 16/12/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
G'day All,
Same scene as Wall of Weeds (different position) but with an extra
element (~105kb)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2160/2105969996_138f6e5141_o.jpg
K10D, DA*16-50 f2.8, f13 @ 15 seconds, flash in hand, fired manually.
A better
Boris, I really think some reviews (rare ones) are truely useful,
complete and objective as one can be.
However DpReview (notthe onl site of course but it is very good
example) typically proves the guys running it are either incompetent
(which I beleive) are a lot more interested in the revenues
Roman, did you notice that DFA645 lens just now?
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mmm isn't it possible to set pre-fire ON with the USER mode from the K10D ?
On Dec 14, 2007 11:13 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also sometimes have to shift *quickly* from tripod shooting
(with pre-fire) to hand-held
With all the rumors around next Pentax DSLR I returned to study lense
roadmap. While all of them already available or yet to come in 2008,
there was one DFA 645 55mm f2.8 with note: tentative name - available
with 645D system launch. We'd already seen the birth of a kool 10D one.
Perhaps next
I also sometimes have to shift *quickly* from tripod shooting
(with pre-fire) to hand-held (without) and vice-versa.
You need a button that materialises another K10D.
Or a K10D that works like my ist-D does.
Which would be more practical when hiking and trying to carry minimum
photo gear.
Well, he was having a hard time ... !
G
On Dec 15, 2007, at 1:10 AM, Bob W wrote:
I'm not surprised. What's that strange beam of light emanating from
his trousers?
This guy was having a hard time crossing the street
during rush hour.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6739648size=lg
I liked the DB3, personally. :-)
G
On Dec 15, 2007, at 1:02 AM, Cotty wrote:
There's one or two dreamers on the list who will enjoy these...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/07/
business_aston_martin0s_new_design_centre/html/1.stm
http://tinyurl.com/2948mx
--
PDML
Dramatic landscapes or major wildlife (600/4 territory) seem to dominate
these
days.
Last time I looked there were around 20 images posted taken with a 600. I
had a majority of them.
I've recently submitted a few more taken with the 600, all were rejected.
I'm beginning to think that somehow
Well, he was having a hard time ... !
Shall we keep firmly on topic?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
A slightly less conventional look at the old juncos:
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?image_id=478s=pentaxdiscusstb=sb
Ist DS + k200/2.5 + tripod + sigma dg500 super + cold fingers.
Cheers,
Francis
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 15/12/07, Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
A slightly less conventional look at the old juncos:
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?image_id=478s=pentaxdiscusstb=sb
Ist DS + k200/2.5 + tripod + sigma dg500 super + cold fingers.
very avante guarde , I like it
--
Cheers,
Cotty
It's certainly an unconventional bird photo and I couldn't quite decide whether
I liked it or not.
On balance, I do.
It has an interesting blend of elements and it's the sort of image that
attracts attention for quite a while so that's certainly a positive.
Just a small point - I think the
On Dec 16, 2007 6:23 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/12/07, Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
A slightly less conventional look at the old juncos:
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?image_id=478s=pentaxdiscusstb=sb
Ist DS + k200/2.5 + tripod + sigma dg500 super + cold
On Dec 16, 2007 4:31 AM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roman, did you notice that DFA645 lens just now?
LOL
Cheers,
Dave :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
G'day Dave
Nice idea but I don't think it's quite come off. The running girl needs to be
more visible. Ask her to come back and then use not quite so lowish powered
flash :-)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
I can understand your feelings, you come top what claims to be a Pentax camera
list and find no one interested in Pentax cameras. It is now the pentax
DIGITAL
mailing list, a strange place to brag about your rather ordinary snaps that
could just as well have been taken with a cel-phone. Film
That is kinda what I thought about it.
Weird.
But sorta cool.
Yes they are juncos (feet).
Thanks for the suggestion about the border, we are always on the lookout
for improvements to the web layout. We've pored a huge amount of time in
to that site trying to get it sell photos, but so
Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we?
Cheers,
Dave
On Dec 16, 2007 6:56 AM, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can understand your feelings, you come top what claims to be a Pentax camera
list and find no one interested in Pentax cameras. It is now the pentax
DIGITAL
mailing
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear
Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we?
Geeze, what brought that on?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
It is unconventional, but still needs to show the bird, I think. I
would think of this as an 'almost - if only I had the camera vertical'
and could have framed the bird.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, December 15, 2007, 1:16:07 PM, you wrote:
F A slightly less conventional look at the old
You may be right. You have submitted some great stuff and I would
expect your level of submissions to be fairly consistent. If they are
rejecting as you surmise, it would be good of them to let us know so
that we don't waste time and bandwidth. I have always felt that the
final judges should be
On 16/12/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we?
Trust me. You do *not* want to be saying that to Graywolf.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
It's hard to make out whether something is lifting off or crash
landing... !
G
On Dec 15, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Francis wrote:
A slightly less conventional look at the old juncos:
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?
image_id=478s=pentaxdiscusstb=sb
Ist DS + k200/2.5 + tripod + sigma
Hi all
Not at all sure about this one. I keep going back to it and half the time I
like it and the other half I don't.
What say ye? Keep or dump?
http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/79901/Spokes_and_Shadows.html
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western
Looks like the subject has potential, but your capture has some issues -
+the shadows are at odds with the subject the light is a bit harsh.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: PESO: Spokes and Shadows
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 02:26:12PM -0800, Bruce Dayton wrote:
You may be right. You have submitted some great stuff and I would
expect your level of submissions to be fairly consistent. If they are
rejecting as you surmise, it would be good of them to let us know so
that we don't waste time
I liked the only one I ever drove - a DB4 Vantage Superlegerra
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 11:48:30AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I liked the DB3, personally. :-)
G
On Dec 15, 2007, at 1:02 AM, Cotty wrote:
There's one or two dreamers on the list who will enjoy these...
On Dec 15, 2007, at 2:36 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Not at all sure about this one. I keep going back to it and half
the time I like it and the other half I don't.
What say ye? Keep or dump?
http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/79901/Spokes_and_Shadows.html
The blown highlights keep
A bit of silliness from Tom. But that's okay. In fact, many of us have
Spotmatics. I have three and quite a few lenses as well. I just don't need
another. And no, most of us don't shoot much film. And yes, many of the pics we
take could have been taken with a cell phone. But so too many of the
So, what day it was before today... yesterday? No, it was testerday.
Three hours walking in Tallinn Old City area. Unfortunately, it was
quite unpleasant weather.
http://home.uninet.ee/~margus02/peso/testerday.jpg
Do you recognize the cameras? :)
(photographed with Pentax Optio 43WR)
BR, Margus
Tom
I'm not sure if this is a tounge in cheek response or your serious.
Yes most of us here are shooting digital, and yes i made what should
have been taken as a humorous response, but to say no one is
interested in film cameras is absurd.
Everyone here has or still has old film cameras
I like what you are attempting, but i have to agree with Ken and Godfrey here.
Highlites are distracting.
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 6:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007, at 2:36 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Not at all sure about this one. I keep going back to it and
My uncle had a DBS-V8 (model prior to being renamed Vantage) which
was a kick to drive: fast, reasonably precise, but heavy. Very nicely
finished, by comparison to the Lamborghini Espada he had prior to it.
I always liked the advertisement for the DBS-V8: just a picture of
the car with
Better detail in the rocks/weeds, not dark, not over bearing.
The flare lower right shoild be no problem fo ryou to get rid of.
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 10:32 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Same scene as Wall of Weeds (different position) but with an extra
element (~105kb)
Great motion shot. Would like to see it larger.
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 4:16 PM, Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A slightly less conventional look at the old juncos:
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?image_id=478s=pentaxdiscusstb=sb
Ist DS + k200/2.5 + tripod + sigma dg500 super + cold
nice shot, i'd like it better with less head room
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 6:28 PM, Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what day it was before today... yesterday? No, it was testerday.
Three hours walking in Tallinn Old City area. Unfortunately, it was
quite unpleasant weather.
On Dec 16, 2007 7:16 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/12/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we?
Trust me. You do *not* want to be saying that to Graywolf.
Too late.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
hmm. E-3, D300, K10D ? testing for whom?
G
On Dec 15, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Margus Männik wrote:
So, what day it was before today... yesterday? No, it was testerday.
Three hours walking in Tallinn Old City area. Unfortunately, it was
quite unpleasant weather.
Ken, your 600mm shots have always amazed me with composure and
clarity. I never know whose photo i'm voting on, is there something
that says who's photo it is.??
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 3:17 PM, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dramatic landscapes or major wildlife (600/4 territory) seem to
I'm having a hard time following this thread
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 3:52 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, he was having a hard time ... !
Shall we keep firmly on topic?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On Dec 15, 2007 2:25 PM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boris, I really think some reviews (rare ones) are truely useful,
complete and objective as one can be.
However DpReview (notthe onl site of course but it is very good
example) typically proves the guys running it are either
My glamour Puss calendar is done - and my 'Son of Sign Language
calendar is done, too
I've gotten my own copies of each of them and they really are printed
nicely.
I had nothing
but grief over my inexpensive version of the second one that I put on
lulu STILL have heard
nothing from them
On 15/12/07, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I liked the only one I ever drove - a DB4 Vantage Superlegerra
John, I now officially need your autograph!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Courageously, I risk bawdy commentary again with
another set of PESOs.
The Seattle Public Library building is a remarkable
and (to me) beautiful piece of architecture. It has
so many angles and facets, and is in such a crowded
part of the city, that it is difficult to photograph.
First, the
On Dec 15, 2007 7:36 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a hard time following this thread
Can you enlarge on that?
Nope, its cold out. :-)
Dave
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I'm having a hard time following this thread
Can you enlarge on that?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Dec 15, 2007 7:46 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Courageously, I risk bawdy commentary again with
another set of PESOs.
The Seattle Public Library building is a remarkable
and (to me) beautiful piece of architecture. It has
so many angles and facets, and is in such a crowded
Sitting in the basement, storm a raging out side, wood stove pumping
out some heat and watching Rez Blues on TV.
For those that can get the program, its fantastic. Some fine First
Nations blues musicians.
See ya tomorrow.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
Peter,
I'm not sure about this one. I like the foreground,
the curving shoreline, and the lower part of the
sky... wintry, with a air of forboding. And then
there is the upper part of the sky, which looks sunny
and happy. Cropping the top quarter or so and
darkening the sky a bit might be an
David J Brooks wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 7:46 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, the facade, taken with the DA 10-17:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6739642size=lg
Next, detail of one of the overhanging glass walls:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6739644size=lg
As one gentleman of taste and discernment to
another...
I liked the color original, and the first BW
conversion a lot. This is even better.
Rick
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6735604
Cropped the left hand partial stone out.
My
Chuck,
No intent to offend you.
A lot of us love the old screwmount gear.
The lenses remind me more of the new premium, metal Limited lens line.
Many folks here would be happy to have them,
but nobody wants to take advantage of you.
We shoot with Pentax digital because the film is so cheap... ;-)
Sounds good. We're having a winter storm as well in Michigan. I'm watching
football with the sound off and listening to Willy Nelson. Love his cover of
Stardust.
Paul
-- Original message
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sitting in the basement, storm a
Can't comment on the rendering. I'm using my daughter's PC laptop. But in terms
of subject matter and composition, I llike the first and third very much.
Paricularly that first shot of the facade. Great application of the rish. Good
work.
Paul
-- Original message
Thanks, Ken
The reason I keep going back to it is because it seems to be a subject that
should make a good image. Unfortunately, I'd been shooting snapshot jpgs just
prior to taking this shot and forgot to switch back to raw which limits the
processing a bit.
Cheers
Brian
Thanks Godfrey.
Actually the blown highlights are a result of post processing. The histogram
of the original image looks OK regarding highlights but the image had a strong
red cast that I tried to correct. Apparently I went too far..
I'll have another go at it and try to get the
Cotty wrote:
On 16/12/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we?
Trust me. You do *not* want to be saying that to Graywolf.
His bed doesn't have a right side ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yes, but the 'flare' on lower right is the point of the image title - unless
Dave S is being more obscure than usual..
:-)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting David J Brooks [EMAIL
On Dec 15, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Courageously, I risk bawdy commentary again with
another set of PESOs.
The Seattle Public Library building is a remarkable
and (to me) beautiful piece of architecture. It has
so many angles and facets, and is in such a crowded
part of the
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:35:19AM +, Cotty wrote:
On 15/12/07, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I liked the only one I ever drove - a DB4 Vantage Superlegerra
John, I now officially need your autograph!
I didn't say I *owned* it. It belonged to a friend who had all
sorts of
That's not exactly true, when the bottom fell out of the film camera
market I picked up most of the screw mount gear I wanted. I have a
classic 35mm kit in screw mount, an SMCT 35mm f3.5, an SMCT 50 f1.4,
and a SMCT 135 f2.5 with a Komura Telemor II 2x converter for extra
reach.with two
Crop it square ... Like it!
Godfrey
On Dec 15, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6739642size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
I'd say this thread has become positively turgid.
David J Brooks wrote:
I'm having a hard time following this thread
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 3:52 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, he was having a hard time ... !
Shall we keep firmly on topic?
--
Cheers,
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
