Walter Hamler wrote:
Yes, I agree about Maya.
I think she had so many things against her back then. She was a young
woman, Asian, and relatively unknown in the field. There were probably
others.
I remember one of the strongest objections was the fact that it was
essentially underground.
On 14.01.2008, at 22:06 , Adam Maas wrote:
The only ones of any real use in predicting camera
performance are the 'ISO 6400 crops'. If they're legit it looks like
the K20D will rival the A700 in high ISO performance, but not the
D300.
It is not known if high ISO noise reduction in K20D was
Sorry, I mix them up: Union, Southern, Western...
:-)
BTW, here is yet another interesting precedences - Court Ruling in a
similar and even more relevant to PDML case:
http://www.bmcforums.com/showthread.php?t=42796
Pictures of buildings do not violate trademark - Rock Roll Hall of
Fame
Seems like another example of technology because it's possible rather than
because it's needed
I was amused by this part of the press release: Burlingame, CA, January 14,
2008..(PMA) Convention, held this week from January 31-February 2,
2008...
this week???
Cheers
Brian
On Jan 15, 2008 3:55 PM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Photoshop fun:
http://foto-forum.foren-city.de/topic,2236,-pentax-k20d.html
Frame rate adjustable from 8 fps to 60 fps. 24MB JPEG size and a
re-focus button. But the crowning jewel has to be the National
Very nicely composed - the alignment of the headstones really lead the eye into
the image.
The branches on the right are a bit distracting but I suspect avoiding them
would have been difficult.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
It seems to me that the responses so far haven't helped you decide which works
best.
As a dedicated 'fence sitter', I'm not going to help either :-)
I prefer the composition of the 'minor crop' but the texture in the bark is
better appreciated in the 'big crop'.
I'd be happy with either.
Thanks for the comment Bruce.
I was actually trying for tree shots for the fall contest, but maybe
the headstones in the shot take that away.??
Maybe i could crop and use this in another catagory, as i do like the
line up of the stones.
Dave
On Jan 14, 2008 6:15 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL
Ditto
Dave
On Jan 14, 2008 9:08 PM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like Mark, I like the first image better and think is would be great
as a larger format work.
Unlike Mark, I think color is the way to go. I love the greens in
with the monochrome gray/browns.
Good stuff.
Regards,
On Jan 15, 2008 11:15 AM, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We were staying not very close to the beach. When the sky looked to be
clearing, we decided to try and catch the sunset. We missed the sun but the
clouds remaining light were impressive. I wish I'd have brought my tripod
from the
I see what you mean.
Its snowed again, and its not far from my house, i'll do a re shoot.
Dave
On Jan 14, 2008 8:44 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this. The only nit I can pick is the way the
tree trunk lines up with the edge of the second
headstone; and I don't care for the
Thanks Brian.
Its hard, but i'll go back today and re do this one. Maybe i can get
in a bit closer or something
Dave
On Jan 15, 2008 6:41 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nicely composed - the alignment of the headstones really lead the eye
into the image.
The branches on
Both are excellent shots Cory. Just proves that 50-200 does a great job.
The second shot is a real heart string tugger.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
I think the story helps the shot Cotty.
Coffee must be expensive in the UK.
Dave
On Jan 14, 2008 7:20 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was in Oxford (UK) recently waiting outside a shop, when this girl
came up and asked me for a pound for a cup of tea. I dug into my pocket
and found some
From: Sandy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/01/14 Mon PM 11:01:06 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Ford claims ownership of images
A Mustang owners club wants to do a calendar using photos of members' cars.
Ford's lawyers object.
Another from the cemetery shoot yesterday.
Same thing, i'm trying for trees in winter shots, but maybe the stones
detract from that.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6840957
K10D, 16-45, LR conversion, CS1 clone dust and minor crop
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
Excellent again
'
Dave
On Jan 14, 2008 7:53 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another somewhat less spectacular shot. I love the calm and
contemplative mood.
The location is an old rural cooperative alongside the Canal de Calais
in Pont d'Ardres, Northern France.
Kitten filter sounds disturbing, afterwards aren't they kind of mushy?
David Savage wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 3:55 PM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Photoshop fun:
http://foto-forum.foren-city.de/topic,2236,-pentax-k20d.html
Frame rate adjustable from 8 fps
Yes, well...
Good thing I wasn't bad mouthing anyone. That would be really embarrassing :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On Jan 15, 2008 3:43 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 12:23 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised my spam filter didn't catch this...
Or my
Depends whether you keep the bits or the juice.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/01/15 Tue PM 02:13:20 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Hilarious K20D photo
Kitten filter sounds disturbing, afterwards aren't they kind of mushy?
David Savage
Well it depents.
If used in conjunction with the fine (art) filter, yes.
If used with the course (grain) filter the results are more chunky.
Cheers,
Dave
On Jan 15, 2008 11:13 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kitten filter sounds disturbing, afterwards aren't they kind of mushy?
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Sorry, I mix them up: Union, Southern, Western...
:-)
BTW, here is yet another interesting precedences - Court Ruling in a
similar and even more relevant to PDML case:
http://www.bmcforums.com/showthread.php?t=42796
Pictures of buildings do not violate trademark - Rock
P. J. Alling wrote:
Kitten filter sounds disturbing, afterwards aren't they kind of mushy?
It's an email filter -- keeps kittens from posting to the list (all
they do is send links to cat photos...)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jan 15, 2008 9:49 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Kitten filter sounds disturbing, afterwards aren't they kind of mushy?
It's an email filter -- keeps kittens from posting to the list (all
they do is send links to cat photos...)
Meow, meow, pur-pur bat a
Me too!!! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like this one a hell of a lot. Good stuff.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Derby: by Lumix LX2, do you mean the point shoot camera? I Goggled the
name that's what I got. Nice food shots. You dine elegantly to say the
least. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent:
David: I agree with Brian below, and I prefer this one to the PESO Tree
Stone II, if you're trying to feature trees. But PESO Tree Stone II is
nice too. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent:
Ralf: I like it! Really like the BW. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Mailingliste pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 6:53 PM
Subject: PESO: More panoramic b/w
Another somewhat less spectacular shot. I love the
On Jan 16, 2008 12:01 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 9:49 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Kitten filter sounds disturbing, afterwards aren't they kind of mushy?
It's an email filter -- keeps kittens from posting to the list (all
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/01/15 Tue PM 03:01:32 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Hilarious K20D photo
On Jan 15, 2008 9:49 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Kitten filter sounds disturbing, afterwards
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=26313600
April or around it seems...
Good news IMO.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML
The poster said it is indeed a preproduction model/firmware.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Very minor crop:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5610a.htm
Big crop:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5610b.htm
-
This is a very hard scene to capture. To my eye, images like this
usually look too busy with all those branches. I've tried this with
Monterey Cypresses several times.
In a message dated 1/14/2008 3:57:35 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like your feedback on which version of this you like better.
First one has a very minor crop and the second was me taking a fresh
look at the scene later and make a fairly large crop. Or you may
On Jan 15, 2008 10:27 AM, Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David: I agree with Brian below, and I prefer this one to the PESO Tree
Stone II, if you're trying to feature trees. But PESO Tree Stone II is
nice too. Cheers, Christine
Thanks
I'm am heading out shortly to try and re
To late. Already ordered a 28-75
Dave
On Jan 15, 2008 11:21 AM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=26313600
April or around it seems...
Good news IMO.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo:
Cotty wrote:
I was in Oxford (UK) recently waiting outside a shop, when this girl
came up and asked me for a pound for a cup of tea. I dug into my pocket
and found some change. I said she could have the money if I could take
her picture. She thought for a moment and said, Okay. But I won't
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:57:06AM -0500, Christian wrote:
XXlarge. Light blue with dark font.
Large. Black with red font. It's Pentax after all right?
And some kind of PDML reference (URL? Logo?), of course.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
On 14/01/08, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
The question being, though *My glasses are clean but my mind isn't. is
currently the leading quote, wouldn't **You can never have too many
lenses. be more appropriate, (and more a likely candidate for a t-shirt
that most
Well, if you are trying for trees, then they need to be the subject.
This one, like the previous one, is about the headstone. Not that
this is a bad shot, just that the trees are more of a framing element
rather than the subject.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, January 15, 2008, 5:21:46 AM,
In a message dated 1/14/2008 4:59:12 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another somewhat less spectacular shot. I love the calm and
contemplative mood.
The location is an old rural cooperative alongside the Canal de Calais
in Pont d'Ardres, Northern France.
Christian wrote:
Cotty wrote:
I would not buy a T shirt saying 'My glasses are clean but my mind isn't'.
Ditto
I just bought one of these:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/surlybikes/2051150920/ My wife finds it
slightly less humorous than I do. I would most definitely buy a shirt
that
yes, it seems to be about evenly divided. I'm guessing that some see
this photo as a forest type shot and others see it as a texture shot.
Your perception of the type of photo would lean you toward one crop or
the other.
I guess I'll have to decide for myself and disappoint half of you :) .
- Original Message -
From: Christian
Subject: Re: PESO - Beggar
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/portraits/images/pic33.html
Epson R-D1 + Voigtlander 28mm Ultron 1.9
ISO 800, 1/40th sec about f5.6
I think I could have done better, maybe not.
YAWN. :-) I find nothing
What law is it that I need to check? If you own the
rights to a company logo you have a legal claim on how
it is displayed and by whom. This doesn't apply to
newspapers and television images, however.
Reproducing logos without permission (like those in
photographs) is rarely allowed by the
Christian wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 14/01/08, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
The question being, though *My glasses are clean but my mind isn't. is
currently the leading quote, wouldn't **You can never have too many
lenses. be more appropriate, (and more a likely candidate for a
David, I'm sure the 28-75 will be a very fine lens too.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jan 15, 2008 12:53 PM, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 14/01/08, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
The question being, though *My glasses are clean but my mind isn't. is
currently the leading quote, wouldn't **You can never have too
On Jan 15, 2008 12:14 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you are trying for trees, then they need to be the subject.
This one, like the previous one, is about the headstone. Not that
this is a bad shot, just that the trees are more of a framing element
rather than the subject.
I would buy a T Shirt that says You can have too many lenses.
Distraction is destructive.
If I wore logo'ed T Shirts, that is. I don't.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
From all I hear, I think so.
My reply was just a, crap already ordered a lens, reply.:-)
Dave
On Jan 15, 2008 12:51 PM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David, I'm sure the 28-75 will be a very fine lens too.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo:
On 14/01/08, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:
Or was that an intentional typo to reflect the list more
accurately?
Unintentional, but Dave B's shirt would be that one ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 14/01/08, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'd prefer it *without* the spelling error ...
Ack sory ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Jan 15, 2008 1:19 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/08, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:
Or was that an intentional typo to reflect the list more
accurately?
Unintentional, but Dave B's shirt would be that one ;-)
Again, all alone in the world.
Some days i wonder why i
Looks like some changes to my online photo finisher here in the GTA.
Dear Future Photo Member,
The world of digital photography is changing rapidly, and as a result,
so is our approach to the photo finishing business.
As a result of these changes, Future Shop has closed its ten in-store
Future
On Jan 15, 2008 12:11 PM, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And some kind of PDML reference (URL? Logo?), of course.
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#5155769608380158002
This is the logo for the hats i made in 2006 for GFM
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 14/01/08, cbwaters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyway... We went to a state park where they had lots of interesting birds.
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/gallery/4169363#243523049-A-LB
Wow - that's one helluva bird.
We were staying not very close to the beach. When the sky looked to be
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: 2007 Quotations List On Line
On 14/01/08, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'd prefer it *without* the spelling error ...
Ack sory ;-)
Probably my fault.
GB
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 14/01/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
EB
Come back WW, all is forgiven.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Just Another Dog Photo
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/91712503
Ivan aged 8 months
K10D, 77ltd
Wendy
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Brendan MacRae wrote:
What law is it that I need to check? If you own the
rights to a company logo you have a legal claim on how
it is displayed and by whom. This doesn't apply to
newspapers and television images, however.
ah, but nonetheless, I've been told my a back-stage guy in the industry
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: For those that use Future Photo, changes a coming
Looks like some changes to my online photo finisher here in the GTA.
Dear Future Photo Member,
The world of digital photography is changing rapidly, and as a result,
so is our
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: PESO: JADP
Just Another Dog Photo
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/91712503
Ivan aged 8 months
K10D, 77ltd
He's sure growing up pretty.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 1/15/08, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian wrote:
Cotty wrote:
I would not buy a T shirt saying 'My glasses are clean but my mind isn't'.
Ditto
I just bought one of these:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/surlybikes/2051150920/ My wife finds it
slightly less humorous
On 15/01/08, wendy beard, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just Another Dog Photo
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/91712503
Ivan aged 8 months
K10D, 77ltd
Wendy, I love your dog pics, they're terrific.
But I keep thinking of this cartoon every time I see one ;-)
It isn't advertising, it can be photographed in public. Sorry, the only
reason to remove the logo is to avoid a frivolous law suit, if the loser
had to pay in the US Ford would never have brought it. This is entirely
covered under fair use. Ford should be happy for the free advertising.
--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
What law is it that I need to check? If you own the
rights to a company logo you have a legal claim on
how
it is displayed and by whom. This doesn't apply to
newspapers and television images, however.
ah, but
Quick! Somebody go roll-over an Explorer,
Just make sure it has Firestone tires on...
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ford claims ownership of images
Quick! Somebody go roll-over an Explorer, and
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae
Subject: Re: Ford claims ownership of images
--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
What law is it that I need to check? If you own the
rights to a company logo you have a legal claim on
how
it is displayed
Your usual excellent work, although I would like to see some texture in the sky.
-Adam
On 1/14/08, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another somewhat less spectacular shot. I love the calm and
contemplative mood.
The location is an old rural cooperative alongside the Canal de
- Original Message -
From: Ken Waller
Subject: Re: Ford claims ownership of images
Quick! Somebody go roll-over an Explorer,
Just make sure it has Firestone tires on...
I read in Popular Mechanics and I believe Car and Driver that the tire issue
turned out to be primarily a Ford
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is where the calender people are running afoul
of things. If the brand
or nameplates are recognizable, they probably are in
violation of copyright
law, if the vehicle is recognizable as a particular
make/model, they may be
in violation as
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't advertising, it can be photographed in
public. Sorry, the only
reason to remove the logo is to avoid a frivolous
law suit, if the loser
had to pay in the US Ford would never have brought
it. This is entirely
covered under fair use.
So you can have the wrong one mounted on the camera...
David J Brooks wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 1:19 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/08, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:
Or was that an intentional typo to reflect the list more
accurately?
Unintentional,
When it's not on a hat it looks like the your lens is cracked...
David J Brooks wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 12:11 PM, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And some kind of PDML reference (URL? Logo?), of course.
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#5155769608380158002
Hi Christine,
Yep, the Panasonic version, rather than the pricey Leica one. The sensor
is pretty noisy above ISO200-400, but I didn't want to pull out big
black K10D. Wanted to be discreet, you know.
Other than the sensor, I'm pretty happy with the LX2, especially in RAW
mode. All the main
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ken Waller
Subject: Re: Ford claims ownership of images
Quick! Somebody go roll-over an Explorer,
Just make sure it has Firestone tires on...
I read in Popular Mechanics and I believe Car and Driver that the tire issue
turned
His teeth are puppy white.
wendy beard wrote:
Just Another Dog Photo
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/91712503
Ivan aged 8 months
K10D, 77ltd
Wendy
--
I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati.
A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated.
When it is
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:57:06AM -0500, Christian wrote:
XXlarge. Light blue with dark font.
Large. Black with red font. It's Pentax after all right?
And some kind of PDML reference (URL? Logo?), of course.
What I have in mind is a small logo on the front:
You can never get enough advertising. However that was just an aside.
Ford would lose this in court, their claim is frivolous. Ford is in no
way harmed, no one is going to confuse the car club with Ford Motor
Company. If loser paid Ford would never have brought the action.
(Right now it
Well done, as usual. I like your dog portraits.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, January 15, 2008, 10:51:46 AM, you wrote:
wb Just Another Dog Photo
wb http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/91712503
wb Ivan aged 8 months
wb K10D, 77ltd
wb Wendy
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
my lawyers will be in touch.
Mark Roberts wrote:
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:57:06AM -0500, Christian wrote:
XXlarge. Light blue with dark font.
Large. Black with red font. It's Pentax after all right?
And some kind of PDML reference (URL? Logo?), of course.
What
It's subtle, but there is texture there.
Excellent work, Ralf.
Adam Maas wrote:
Your usual excellent work, although I would like to see some texture in the
sky.
-Adam
On 1/14/08, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another somewhat less spectacular shot. I love the calm and
...the tire issue turned out to be primarily a Ford problem, in that the
Explorer suspension
was inherently unstable...
Not so. The Explorer suspension was not unique to the vehicle.
...so they chose a small tire and listed dangerously low inflation
pressures in the manual to drop the center
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nice to angle the whole thing a tad more to the left.
The Noblex is a rangefinder camera (if that is what one calls a
viewfinder made of two lenses in a rectangular box where you look
straight through) and precise framing is total guesswork. I already had
to fake a few
No, in the Tiffany case it was the stock company not
wanting to face possible litigation, just like Cafe
Press. Trademarks are strictly off limits unless you
get permission or can prove public domain.
-Brendan
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can never get enough advertising.
Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your usual excellent work, although I would like to see some texture
in the sky.
There *is* texture in the sky. Not much but it's clearly visible, on my
screen. Besides, on the few days when there was more texture in this
sky, I would have been blown into
On 1/15/08, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your usual excellent work, although I would like to see some texture
in the sky.
There *is* texture in the sky. Not much but it's clearly visible, on my
screen. Besides, on the few days when there
Excellent, Ken. Please take the stand:-).
I find it very entertaining that so many people, who know so little about
automobiles, are always ready to trash the US auto industry. It's been a
popular indoor sport since Ralph and company kicked it off in the late sixties
with another misinformation
Francis wrote:
Good morning my good people,
These diving ducks feed in extremely tight flocks, all diving at the
same time, and then all surfacing together. I've taken lots of photos of
them over the years but this is the first one that seemed worthwhile.
http://tinyurl.com/ys5zwf
I suppose we'll hear soon.
I use them for some of my prints, and i think they do a decent job,
plus they deliver.
Dave
On Jan 15, 2008 2:07 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: For those that use Future Photo, changes a coming
On Jan 15, 2008 3:09 PM, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my lawyers will be in touch.
Their busy at Ford right now, take a number.:-)
Dave
Mark Roberts wrote:
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:57:06AM -0500, Christian wrote:
XXlarge. Light blue with dark font.
That is correct. They are strictly off limits. You cannot use someone
else's trade mark, and in the case of a stock photo containing jewelry
there is more than a little chance that a Jewelry Store purchasing it
for advertising, and not being a Tiffany distributor. might run afoul of
that.
On Jan 15, 2008 2:47 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
His teeth are puppy white.
Wait till he starts hanging out with the Labs, smoking, drinking,
barking, tail wagging.
Dave
wendy beard wrote:
Just Another Dog Photo
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/91712503
Ivan aged
Thats great.
Dave
On Jan 15, 2008 1:51 PM, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just Another Dog Photo
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/91712503
Ivan aged 8 months
K10D, 77ltd
Wendy
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jan 15, 2008 2:55 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:57:06AM -0500, Christian wrote:
XXlarge. Light blue with dark font.
Large. Black with red font. It's Pentax after all right?
And some kind of PDML reference (URL? Logo?),
How's the sky on the other contributors' monitors? Anyone else using a
calibrated display? Mine is callibrated with a Colorvision Spyder.
Excellent, delicate texturing is visible on both my laptop and
desktop monitors. Both are calibrated with the Eye One Display 2 unit
and its accompanying
Ralf: Even on my crappy monitor at work, I'm getting lovely, delicate
texturing (I'm quoting Godfrey below). Frankly, I wouldn't worry about a
thing with this photo. It's lovely as is, in my view. Big cheers, Christine
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My calibration settings are 130
Luminance, 1.8 gamma, 5500K white point.
Aha. Same here.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:53:22PM -0500, David J Brooks wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 2:55 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:57:06AM -0500, Christian wrote:
XXlarge. Light blue with dark font.
Large. Black with red font. It's
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
