Nice one, Frank - what did the ice droplets sound like when they hit the
ground?
On 4/10/2015 11:27 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Looking through some old pics - this was taken winter before last, one
of the coldest days with a camera I've ever had. The K10D acquitted
itself quite well in -45C win
I came across this video review, which along the way demonstrated
an interesting rig for attaching a microphone to the photo camera:
https://youtu.be/HtAFvqI1kj0?t=7m25s
I don't do video much, but when I do, I seldom use the external
microphone with my K-5iis camera, primarily because of diffic
Nicely captured - is that a political statement?
On 4/11/2015 7:30 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Another slice of The City:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18002559&size=md
Optio S
Comments invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
---
This email is free f
Thanks very much, Paul. It does make sense, and is very helpful.
I'm starting to think that since I don't need to transfer files elsewhere
immediately, I really just need more real estate for viewing images - shooting
interiors is killing me, so many details! - that maybe all I need is the HDMI
Beautifully photographed!
Cheers,
frank
On 9 April, 2015 8:27:29 PM EDT, Mark C wrote:
>A few more spring wildflowers -
>
>http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/more-spring-ephemeral-wildflowers
>
>Comments welcome.
>
>Mark
>
>---
>This email is free from viruses and malware because
First the vitamin F, the delicious feijoa. People either love or hate this
fruit and it's now the time of year when they are everywhere. We have a small
tree at the front of our property but it's overshadowed by another tree and
never really fruited much. I always thought the lack of light wa
Lovely. Colours, composition, spring. Lovely.
Cheers,
frank
On 9 April, 2015 6:57:21 PM EDT, Rick Womer wrote:
>Another from my way to work last week:
>
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17998005
>
>(K-5, DA 40/2.8 Ltd.)
>
>Comments?
>
>Rick
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail
Thanks, Dan!
I would have preferred a bit more sharpness but I was shivering.
Actually the wind was what made it hard to hold the camera steady, especially
with ice underfoot.
Thanks again.
Cheers,
frank
On 11 April, 2015 7:24:34 AM EDT, "Daniel J. Matyola"
wrote:
>B!
>
>You caught
Love the light!
Very well captured.
Cheers,
frank
On 11 April, 2015 7:30:39 AM EDT, "Daniel J. Matyola"
wrote:
>Another slice of The City:
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18002559&size=md
>Optio S
>Comments invited.
>
>Dan Matyola
>http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
-
Thanks, Jack.
I'm not sure I "get" the ad, but it is just weird enough.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Well caught, Dan!
>
> Jack
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 11, 2015, at 4:30 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrot
Christine -
I have a couple of the Eye-Fi Pro series cards. I use the Pro rather
than the Mobi in the event I want to transfer RAW files from the card to
either my iPad or computer. Transferring RAW files however would be a
last resort as it's a slo-o-o-o-w process.
OTOH, I have my camera
james wrote:
>On 12/04/2015 6:34 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
>> I would think focus stacking would greatly reduce the necessity of a tilt
>> shift lens for most photographers.
>>
>Are you sure?? I was told the shift lens fixed perspective, not focus.
Correct. Focus stacking would reduce the need for t
Are you sure?? I was told the shift lens fixed perspective, not focus.
James
On 12/04/2015 6:34 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
I would think focus stacking would greatly reduce the necessity of a tilt shift
lens for most photographers.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.ne
I would think focus stacking would greatly reduce the necessity of a tilt shift
lens for most photographers.
-Original Message-
>From: Stanley Halpin
>Sent: Apr 11, 2015 10:39 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: Rare lens at KEH (speaking of depth of field)
>
>Sorry - I sho
On 4/11/2015 10:08 AM, Stanley Halpin wrote:
I received an ad from KEH yesterday; in short it said “come look at
all our Pentax stuff!” So I did.
As I browsed through I saw this:
https://www.keh.com/242007/pentax-28mm-f-3-5-smc-shift-k-mount-manual-focus-lens-built-in
I have heard of the k-mo
P.J. Alling wrote:
> DigitalRev did one of they're, as usual, "Wise Ass" reviews of the K-S2
> and didn't pan it, exactly, more like damned it with faint praise.
> It's the first actual commercial review I've seen of it, and the new
> 18-55mm Kit lens so people might want to take a look. No link b
DigitalRev did one of they're, as usual, "Wise Ass" reviews of the K-S2
and didn't pan it, exactly, more like damned it with faint praise. It's
the first actual commercial review I've seen of it, and the new 18-55mm
Kit lens so people might want to take a look. No link but it's on YouTube.
--
Sorry - I should have checked current availability before posting the link.
They were asking $528.
On Apr 11, 2015, at 10:33 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> Apparently someone bought it already, what price were they asking.
>
> I believe that the company making the new K mount tilt/shift lens is Samy
Hi Eric -
Three thoughts come to mind - first that DOF is the range of "apparent"
or "acceptable" sharpness, but parts of the subject that are not right
at the focal plane will still be slightly out of focus. Not an issue in
many genres of photography but in macro, where the detail is crucial,
Apparently someone bought it already, what price were they asking.
I believe that the company making the new K mount tilt/shift lens is
Samyang, and theirs is a tilt/shift not just shift. additionally the
Samyang is 24mm so it's AOV is actually wide angle on APS-C, as opposed
to true normal fo
Hi Darren -
The best I can come up with for shipping is $12.75 for a medium USPS
flat rat box. So how about $18? Since it is a flat rate box I could fit
some other things into the bag as well - the Fujica camera would fit
nicely or the A 80-200
Mark
On 4/11/2015 12:18 AM, Darren Ad
I don't know from your post the focal length but, at f22 refraction
becomes an issue with almost any "small" format camera, (in the digital
age almost everything not using film is a small format for these
purposes), rule of thumb is it starts taking a toll at about f8~f11. on
35mm format.
It'
I received an ad from KEH yesterday; in short it said “come look at all our
Pentax stuff!” So I did.
As I browsed through I saw this:
https://www.keh.com/242007/pentax-28mm-f-3-5-smc-shift-k-mount-manual-focus-lens-built-in
I have heard of the k-mount 28mm shift lens; this is the first I have e
You didn’t say what focal length.
Assuming you were using 200mm at 20’, f/11 the depth of field would be 4”.
50mm at 20’, f/11 would be 5’9”
The one app I am using to calculate these numbers doesn’t want to use an
aperture smaller than f/11.
The other app says 2’11” for 200mm, f/22 at 20’ but I a
Eric,
Focusing at infinity with that long focal length lens would not produce
good results, especially at the longer end of the zoon.
I suspect that you may have mixed focusing at infinity with focusing at
the hyperfocal distance. The definition of the latter is when you focus to
it, everythi
Not very well without an aperture ring, but you can trust the limit of
acceptable focus to be achieved.
Jack
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2015, at 6:16 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> My wording problem. What I meant was focus at 1/3 of the dista
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> My wording problem. What I meant was focus at 1/3 of the distance into the
> scene, not at infinity.
Can you judge the depth of field with that aperture at that distance?
--
My wording problem. What I meant was focus at 1/3 of the distance into the
scene, not at infinity.
Jack
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2015, at 5:37 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> Infinity focus perhaps should have
>> Been only about 1/3 of the w
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> Infinity focus perhaps should have
> Been only about 1/3 of the way
> into the scene.(?)
Thanks, Jack. I’m not certain, but I imagine I was halfway in.
--
Infinity focus perhaps should have
Been only about 1/3 of the way
into the scene.(?)
Jack
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 5:23 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> Mark’s post about stack focusing brought to mind a problem I encountered the
> other day. I was shooting wildflowers at Arabia Mount
Mark’s post about stack focusing brought to mind a problem I encountered the
other day. I was shooting wildflowers at Arabia Mountain, just outside Atlanta.
(One of several stone outcrops, with unique ecosystems, that occur here in
Georgia.) I was using my DA 50-200 with the camera on a tripod
Well caught, Dan!
Jack
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 4:30 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Another slice of The City:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18002559&size=md
> Optio S
> Comments invited.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> --
Another slice of The City:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18002559&size=md
Optio S
Comments invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, p
B!
You caught the wave at a moment that displays it power and chaos.
Fine image, Frank.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:27 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> Looking through some old pics - this was taken winter before last, one
> of the co
34 matches
Mail list logo
