On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:26:21PM -0600, Bill wrote:
>
> On the subject of beastliness, here is a quick and dirty shot of the D FA*
> 85/1.4 grouped with the M85/2, FA77/1.8 and A*85/1.4.
Back in the days before auto-focus I often wondered about the M85/2.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail
There you go. 23 would be suitable.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:41 PM John wrote:
>
> I don't think the 21mm LTD is exactly a "Prime" under the scheme Gonz was
> proposing.
>
> Maybe if they made a 23mm LTD.
>
> On 8/24/2021 18:54:21, Bill wrote:
> > On 8/24/2021 4:48 PM, Gonz wrote:
> >> OK wow,
We had several cherry tomato plants growing in pots, and doubted that they
would survive not being watered while we were on vacation.
So we picked everything, took it with us to New Hampshire, and waited to see
what would ripen.
One evening I took this photo:
Excellent pic of the comet! I took a similar one, but with way more
background noise since I wasn't in anywhere near a dark sky as you got
there. Did you use a tracking mount or similar? I noticed it was
10s, so perhaps at 85 mm no significant star trails would be visible
in that short exposure.
I know some here still shoot film. I would if I had a better way to get
processed. I just don't have the means right now, particularly for medium (120)
or large (4x5) format.
I saw this on PetaPixel yesterday:
I don't think the 21mm LTD is exactly a "Prime" under the scheme Gonz was
proposing.
Maybe if they made a 23mm LTD.
On 8/24/2021 18:54:21, Bill wrote:
On 8/24/2021 4:48 PM, Gonz wrote:
OK wow, that's way too big for an 85!! No kidding about the beast
part. If you don't want that junky
On 8/24/2021 4:48 PM, Gonz wrote:
OK wow, that's way too big for an 85!! No kidding about the beast
part. If you don't want that junky looking 85 * though, let me know.
;)
Looks like I'll stick with my old FA, lol.
The 77 came today, it's so light and lovely. I'm in love. Sharp as a
5 body
OK wow, that's way too big for an 85!! No kidding about the beast
part. If you don't want that junky looking 85 * though, let me know.
;)
Looks like I'll stick with my old FA, lol.
The 77 came today, it's so light and lovely. I'm in love. Sharp as a
5 body blade man.
Now they need a 17
On 8/24/2021 7:36 AM, Gonz wrote:
Thanks for the info Bill, I'm looking forward to using the 77. On the
85 side, I have an older FA85 1.4 that I got for a bargain price in
the bad old days of ebay. Its a heavy lens, but I heard the new one
is really a beast. Mine is so razor sharp I just
'morning all,
The theme for September is "Mailboxes".
Submit here: http://pug.komkon.org/submit/
Submission Guidelines here: http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
Thanks for the info Bill, I'm looking forward to using the 77. On the
85 side, I have an older FA85 1.4 that I got for a bargain price in
the bad old days of ebay. Its a heavy lens, but I heard the new one
is really a beast. Mine is so razor sharp I just can't imagine a
sharper lens to be
On 8/23/2021 6:00 PM, Bob Pdml wrote:
There are only 8 photos on the Instagram post, so you may have seen them all.
They are by a certain Jessie Tarbox* Beals. Well worth a look elsewhere,
particularly as she photographed the national parks, which I know interest you,
at night.
B
*whose
> On 23 August 2021 at 21:51 Bob Pdml wrote:
>
>
> Just in case there’s anyone here whom the cap fits.
>
> From Instagram:
>
> https://www.instagram.com/p/CS7Bcsan6Fp/?utm_medium=share_sheet
> --
Won't (apparently) let me do other than accept all cookies, so it's a big
goodbye from me.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
