On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 08:19:28PM -0500, John Sessoms wrote:
> Many of the older Canon/Nikon shooters in the nature photography group I'm
> involved with have switched to Four Thirds (micro four thirds?) mirrorless
> systems.
>
> A 150-400 lens in that system apparently has an 35mm equivalent of
Both very lovely
ann
On 3/12/2022 4:47 AM, David Mann wrote:
I've been going through some more 6x7 scans...
Milford Sound at Dusk:
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1056/#peso
A River in Fiordland:
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1163/#peso
(The equipment specified for this one is a guess)
FWIW, when a used Pentax FA-600/4 showed up at KEH, it only cost me
slightly more than I paid for my Jeep, and thanks to the Covid stimulus
checks I was able to pay it off in 2 years (instead of 3 like I expected).
On 3/11/2022 11:41 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The Sony RX10 IV is listed as
Many of the older Canon/Nikon shooters in the nature photography group
I'm involved with have switched to Four Thirds (micro four thirds?)
mirrorless systems.
A 150-400 lens in that system apparently has an 35mm equivalent of
300-800mm ... and costs slightly less than Canon/Nikon big glass.
I’m only 30 seconds in to the video and he describes Tony Northrup's video on
ISO like a turd in an elevator, it’s wrong on so many levels. If it continues
like this, it’ll be gold!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwRsWomRzVQ
It sounds like Tony Northrup is today’s Kennyboy.
--
Larry Colen
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 5:25 PM ann sanfedele wrote:
> Lovely shot , Mark -- it looks like an etching or fine serograph..
>
> THe original post didn't come into my mailbox .. btw -
>
Tree to big to fit in.:-)
Dave
>
> ann
>
> On 3/11/2022 2:22 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
> > Am 11.03.22 um
Eish!
Alan C
On 12-Mar-22 03:14 PM, Subash Jeyan wrote:
i am moving in the opposite direction (perhaps because i am
rather youngish at 59?). i've just sold my k3ii + sigma 150-500
(combined, 2.7kg) and got myself a nikon d500 + nikkor 200-500/5.6 (3.2
kg). i hope i survive. in case i don't, i
i am moving in the opposite direction (perhaps because i am
rather youngish at 59?). i've just sold my k3ii + sigma 150-500
(combined, 2.7kg) and got myself a nikon d500 + nikkor 200-500/5.6 (3.2
kg). i hope i survive. in case i don't, i do have the k5iis and the HD
55-300 as a backup :)
~subash
Henk, I agree (also 78) but in my case a K5 & HD 55-300. BTW, great
images. The K5 doesn't do that well.
Alan C
On 12-Mar-22 01:45 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:
(resent, cropped to < 10 kb)
My rather lightweight walk-around gear now (I'm 78 y) is just the K-70 with
the 55-300 PLM and that is OK for
Increase: Having to cut the grass more often & a weed population
explosion! Generally the bush is getting denser. Mopane trees, in scrub
form, are slowly taking over grasslands in Kruger - good for the prey,
difficult for the predators & game-viewers. Occasional wildfires are a
natural form of
(resent, cropped to < 10 kb)
My rather lightweight walk-around gear now (I'm 78 y) is just the K-70 with
the 55-300 PLM and that is OK for most of the animals I see.
No need to crawl in on the ground for flowers or mushrooms and I can focus
on anything from a meter distance..
Though I'm not a keen
I've been going through some more 6x7 scans...
Milford Sound at Dusk:
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1056/#peso
A River in Fiordland:
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1163/#peso
(The equipment specified for this one is a guess)
Cheers,
Dave
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To
12 matches
Mail list logo
