Maybe...
Alex
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:
Yes!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2015, at 5:48 AM, Knarf knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
No
On 5 July, 2015 8:27:18 AM EDT, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
I know i'll regret this, but
I read that as Check today's date, fools. :)
Alex
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Check today's date, folks.
Paul via phone
On Apr 1, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
Well, I've decided if you can't beat em, join em.
Mirror overrun - quite rare, but typical for the K-3. Make sure you
have the latest firmware (v1.11) installed; it's supposed to help.
Alex
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:
This AMI was trying to wait out a perched young eagle. Don't believe I've
ever
I only knew him from his messages on PDML and your stories - yet I'm
saddened to hear that he's gone.
Rest in peace, Bill Owens.
Alex (long time lurker)
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill died earlier today, with family around him.
As Mark
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Bipin Gupta bip...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Sir, last month I bought the largest sized rocket blower for that
mighty blast of air - Giottos AA 1900. I made sure this was the
original and not a cheap Chinese copy. I intended to use it for
blasting the sensor,
I'm usually just lurking around - did that for more than a decade -
but in this case I can't stay quiet. Best wishes to Doug!
Alex
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Today's the day our beloved listmeister is scheduled for surgery. He'd
talked to me
Talking about price, I didn't see mentioned 645Z's: around $8500.
Alex
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
51 megapixel 43.8 x 32.8 sensor. ISO to 204,800, and it?s a bit smaller
than a Nikon D4. Why
Hello, Paul,
I was browsing the DPReview Pentax SLR Talk Forum, when I found this post:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/52877156 (author: Mark Dimalanta)
It has snapshots from Ricoh's boot, and while it's in the background
guess which image can be seen in the first pic, top-left corner wink
That's great, congratulations! Yes, I recall the pic - an excellent
one, there's no doubt about it.
I can't attend the CES, unfortunately; it's on the wrong continent
wink (I would have loved to see your image printed properly); I hope
this means they will make a habit from having a nice gallery
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:24 PM, CollinB coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/hd-pentax-limited-primes-review.html
All SMC to HD.
And they have earned a red stripe for differentiation.
And better coatings (not that SMC was bad, but there is a difference),
and rounded
considerably over the years since it was first introduced.
Ricoh is doing a lot of good things with the Pentax Brand but moving the
nomenclature from SMC to HD isn't one of them. SMC means something, HD is
generic and doesn't.
On 12/4/2013 8:45 AM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:51 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2013-12-04 10:37 Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote
However, AFAIK HD is not a new version of SMC, but a different kind of
coating (just like, but not really on the same level as Aero Bright
Coating). I agree the name
, - yes, HD is ubiquitous these days, and that's what
they are targeting.
SMC is widely known to a limited circle of people. HD is a better
buzz word for the broader customer base.
Wed Dec 4 12:37:11 EST 2013
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
However, AFAIK HD is not a new version of SMC
, it should be harder /
more resilient to being scratched.
I tried to dig through their patents, but I can't accurately say which
one is for the HD coating.
Alex
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:48 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2013-12-04 11:15 Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote
On Wed, Dec 4
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-3-review/introduction.html
I can't really understand why anyone would read a review from a
fanboy site like Pantex Forums.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/10/2013 5:34 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I can understand your feelings, that video content would be viewed as
superficial and suspicious if it were aired in Australia.
Why may I ask? You have a guy, we'll give him
Tomorrow it should be back.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
AND now the page is a 404 error.
: )
Alex
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Jan van Wijk pen...@dfsee.com wrote:
Hi all,
Based on new leaked images (see dpreview) from:
http://digicame-info.com/2013/10/k-3-5.html
It seems the new K3 has major improvements in the video area:
- Dedicated still/movie switch on the back
-
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Sep 29, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
alexandru.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
Regardless of the speed of the AF, all FT SLR lenses have autofocused with
all Olympus mFT cameras from day one of the Pen E-P1
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Sep 26, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
alexandru.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me rephrase that: would a newly designed telecentric lens have
issues, with offset microlenses? (it's the other way around
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
alexandru.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
The M mount has a short registration, but the lenses designed for the M
mount were not originally designed for a digital sensor
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I've been thinking about upcoming cameras from a Pentax-centric point
of view. We keep asking for a Pentax full frame camera, and the
latest rumors seem to have being mirrorless. There are a lot of
technical advantages in
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
This should be qualified. Leica, just like Nikon and Pentax, deemed that it
was more important to maintain compatibility with their existing lens lines
than to redesign the lens mount on the M and F mount bodies,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:02 AM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
alexandru.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
...However, neither M nor F mounts are ideal for 24x36mm
Yes, Canon's 600EX-RT is weather sealed; same for the 580EX-II.
Alex
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Tanya, I carry some clear plastic bags to pop over flashes if there's
danger of wetting. You could also spray waterproofing on the softbox
shell
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:37 AM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
If RiceWhine keeps resetting his clock eventually he'll be right about
something.
I doubt it, if there is even an one day gap the new product
announcements will sneak in between.
Just FTR, he's now claiming Pentax
I don't care much about what rumors say (by the way, the 5 DSLRs in
a month is obviously fake). Photorumors are still clinging to the
Pentaxforum's 1st April K-3 joke, they will post garbage without a
second thought.
From the few interviews with Pentax officials I'd say the FF is most
likely
Good luck, and speedy recovery!
Alex
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:51 AM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
In for x-rays today. Ankle reduction worked as hoped. Bone healing where it
should be.
Old splint (partial cast) off. New full cast on. Still not a walking cast but
is Pentax doesn't exist as a company. It's purely
IP at this point. Hoya bought the Pentax IP, then sold it to Ricoh.
There is no Pentax, it's a brand name owned by Ricoh.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
alexandru.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Mark
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
On 3/4/2013 12:31 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Won't be the first time a company NAME lives on after the company is dead
buried.
As in the case of Pentax?
Mark
FTR, there is a company called Pentax Ricoh Imaging, and
The natural order of things:
Step 1. Buy it
Step 2. Find the reasons why you needed that.
I think such discussions are premature ;)
Alex
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:42 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I think the thing that has been lost is all the discussion is the simplest
reason
Funny :)
By the way, apparently Pentax Japan confirmed the FF, in a
not-yet-released Pentaxforums interview. Since last year they started
talking about FF (as in: we're developing it, marketing must think
about a profitable solution).
I hope a certain event involving a hat would be properly
Happy Birthday!
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
sorry guys, haven't been up to keeping up much for a bit
so I'll be a spoiled brat and point out that today is my 76th birthday -
been busy with ebay and other stuff for a few weeks.
--
Best regards,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:05 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/12/2012 3:34 AM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but since diffraction is actually
affecting what's projected on the sensor, in other words its effect
being the same regardless
Hello,
Comments interlined below.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
They're really only competing in the APS-C arena and that's about it.
The 645D is just about out of everyone's price range including mine.
Was it ever relevant?
The 645D is definitely relevant,
Hello, again,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu alexandru.sa...@gmail.com
Hello,
Comments interlined below.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
They're really only competing in the APS-C arena
If you're happy with the K20D, I don't see why you should change it.
K-5's (sensor) limits are definitely much higher, but if you use the
K20D where it gives good results...
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:38 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
It's still not
Collin,
I agree, those context switches weren't easy on them, and roller
coaster corporate ride is a good way to describe what it happened (the
founder family lost control when Pentax become publicly owned, which
allowed Sparx to push Pentax into Hoya's arms, and finally Hoya sold
them to Ricoh -
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Nah, if I upgrade it has to be another system, Pentax are just falling
further and further behind the competition with each incarnation. It's
a pity really. Save for the hassle and cost of going through the big
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
It's difficult for me to conclude anything except that Pentax
just does not have the capacity to produce anything more advanced.
All the buyer gets is a few tweaks.
Baby steps are not adequate in today's
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM, SV Hovland pdml...@heime.org wrote:
There are already reports from K-30 users that this model is better than K-5.
And K-5 II is using a similar AF system as K-30 so I expect it to be more of
an upgrade than Adam at Pentaxforums seems to know.
My K-5 is in
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
Some others on the PDML might recall Richard Day, whom I met in early 2005 on
the DPReview Pentax SLR forum. Several of us visited with Richard and his
wife Pat on a PDML get together in Oxford during the Spring of
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
If somebody is interested, there seems to be a very good deal
for a cost-effective reasonable quality IPS 24 monitor from Dell
U2412M:
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/deals-discount-electronics-coupons-logicbuy,17078.html
clarification can be useful to people
interested.
Igor
Wed Aug 22 07:50:11 EDT 2012
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Igor Roshchin str at komkon.org
wrote:
If somebody is interested, there seems to be a very good deal
for a cost-effective reasonable quality
Who said anything about Pentax? It must be the new Nikon D600 :p
Alex
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
I give up. There will be a full frame Pentax in September? If not, I'll be
disappointed by the ... hype?
Sent from my iPad
Jeffery L. Smith
New
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:53 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never had a card fail that way, I've had the case crack and the write
protect tab fall out, (why the heck do we have a feature that first appeared
on floppy disks, and wasn't such a good idea then still on a
Hello,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick comparison of the K-5 specs with the K-30 seems to show only
minor(?) differences.
K-30 lacks HDMI out? (not mentioned, anyway)
K-30 lacks 3.5 stereo microphone (built-in monaural only)?
Unfortunately,
Pentax just announced the K-30. Coincidence? ;)
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
K-5 ordered.
Rick
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
is not a K-5 replacement, in several respects.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu alexandru.sa...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: I have weakened
Pentax
The best camera must be the 41MP Nokia - most MP per buck ;)
Alex
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
The 645D is a 40MP camera. The D800/E is a 36MP camera. Cost per MP
calculation:
645D is $250/MP
800E is $92/MP
(K-5 is $62.50/MP if priced at $1000)
In
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to get someone a nice, comfortable neck strap as a gift. (I
use a wrist strap) Recommendations?
I have the Pentax neoprene strap - IMO it's much better than the standard one.
A leather strap should be even
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
It seems that AF of my K10D is slowly deteriorating. It started with my
new FA 43/1.9 Ltd that would not focus sometimes. That is, the lens
would be in focus, but electronics would not confirm - lost shot.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Peter Fairweather
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samsung feature very strongly with a 2 page advertisement centre
spread on the GX20. On the front page you can read about their plans
to produce their own lenses rather than rely on Tokina. With help
from their
On Feb 7, 2008 6:04 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The DA 40mm is said to be the same optical formula as the M 40mm which
is soft in the corners on 35mm. It is however eminently pocketable.
There were few Pentax 35mm cameras that could set the aperture from the
body so I still say
On Feb 7, 2008 1:08 PM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know if the 70mm Limited will cover (with good results)
the 35mm frame, and for that I need your help.
I've saw some time ago a test but I can't find it again :( I remember
Hello,
I'd like to know if the 70mm Limited will cover (with good results)
the 35mm frame, and for that I need your help.
I've saw some time ago a test but I can't find it again :( I remember
the 70mm was OK re. vignetting, however I don't know if the corners
are sharp (from what I've saw the DA
On Jan 23, 2008 7:42 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where's all the speculation?
Speculation? We already know everything about the new camera, and the
lenses grin
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Nov 15, 2007 3:24 PM, .timbercode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wish it would this easy in Hungary. Here we rarely have the Hama version
... and that's all. Buying a Pentax version of PK-M42 adapters ...
sounds like a dream :D
.t
Buy from Romania, it's just across the border :)
--
Best
On 11/1/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Fairweather wrote:
I've even looked at the manual without success. I'm sure this wasn't a
problem on my DS. Any hints?
Darn, I'd swear I remembered a setting like this in the Custom Functions
(or Pentax Functions or whatever they're
On 11/2/07, Peter Fairweather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John
Thanks to advice received here I've cracked the numbering problem.
I do wonder whether formatting the card each time is better than deleting
all.
Perhaps someone can enlighten os?
Peter
I would format it, at least from time
On 10/21/07, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to Ken Takeshita:
Seems there's a strong rumour in Japan that Pentax would go with
Cypress 14Mpix FF sensor.
It seems someone is going to use that sensor and since Pentax is the
only brand not affiliated with any sensor brand for
On 10/19/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with dreaming of FF?
rg2
Dreaming? It was only a dream?
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On 9/19/07, Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a discussion some time ago about a Metz flash for the K10D and other
DSLRs from Pentax, the 58AF 1P. Technikdirect has it now for 300 euro,
shipping in 1 to 2 days.
On 6/19/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting, you sure your drive will handle DVD-RAM? What software are you
using to burn it? Nero and Roxio do have an option to erase the disk. If you
are using Windows built-in stuff, who knows.
I may be wrong, but AFAIK a DVD-RAM can be used
On 6/12/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Reese wrote:
this Pentax marketing deal seems a bit odd:
http://www.mad.co.uk/Main/News/Articlex/9bb65e3aea564c28a376d78b3479b46b/Pentax-reels-in-NFA-deal.html
does anyone besides me think this is a little fishy?
Tom Reese
On 5/25/07, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't imagine Sparx has any intention to retain its shares. When an
equity firm pushes for a merger, it usually indicates that they plan to
cash out their shares.
Paul
-
I hope so. One thing doesn't add up, though: Why would Sparx
On 5/16/07, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went the same route, from DS to K10D.
I liked the DS, but it made me feel like a man at the end of a good camera.
I'm not looking back. Kept both. And are still using the DS a bit. Different
cameras for different needs and use.
Have you had
On 5/16/07, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OH GOD, Canon has a EOS 10D and Pentax has a K10D?
That is BAD. Whoever came second shouldnt have named
theirs nearly the same a competitor's camera model.
Im surprised a damn law suit didnt come out of that one...
jco
100% agree. Instead
On 4/25/07, Steve Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
(Side note: I love the fact that Pentax put an IR remote sensor both
front and back. It makes working in the field with a tripod and the
mirror-up prefire a joy. One less bloody wire and device dangling
from the camera and likely to
On 4/15/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang.
Last month i took my PC into the local shop to add more Ram (was 256,
now 728 DRAM) and to upgrade my 4 USB 1.1 connections to USB 2
connections. After rebooting to check the Ram, he looked at my system,
and said because i have XP
On 4/14/07, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 14, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Thibouille wrote:
Very common. Same goes for hard drives.
Manufacturer sell devices with capacity calculated as if (only
marketting purpose of course) 1GB was 1000 MB, 1MB = 1000KB and 1 KB =
1000 Bytes which of
I would avoid blue Sandisk cards. Actually even Ultra II are not that
fast (but they are decent).
For now I'm using Twinmos, a 2GB and a 4GB one, both 150X. Yes, the
4GB is a SD and not a SDHC card - finding a SDHC reader is a pain in
the (beep). Some 4GB+ SDHC will come with a reader, btw.
The
And another...
Alex Sarbu
On 2/24/07, Bill Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And another...
Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 1/2/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got one in my camera bag.
Dave (helpful aren't I? :-)
On 1/2/07, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I'm not the only one.. but if anybody knows where to find one,
I'd be very grateful.
My location is brussels, Belgium but I
On 1/1/07, Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Happy 2007 from a strangely cloudy Naples!
Ciao,
Gianfranco
Happy New Year!
From the newest European Union member :) (Romania)
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 12/22/06, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But as far as I have seen reported on this list very few buy a Samsung DSLR?
Would they if the price difference to the Pentax twin would be maybe 20%
or more or do they simple want the Pentax logo for any (sentimental) reason
despite the cost
On 12/22/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JOKE. But yeah, I like my gear and I don't mind being called a nutter
for giving inanimate objects names and such. It's all a bit of fun :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
I think I'll call the K10D Woody Woodpecker. Just engage the DR system
and you'll know why
Hello,
For the few of you who didn't know this yet:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk10d/
Highly recommended (just)
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 12/15/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
10 stops ... That's in line with what my testing indicated ... :-)
G
Did you used special techniques to recover more DR from the raws? (I
assume you were not using jpeg).
And what do you think about the other issues with this camera? You
On 12/16/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
10 stops ... That's in line with what my testing indicated ... :-)
Did you used special techniques to recover more DR from the raws? (I
assume you were not using jpeg
Hello, Attila.
What do you think about the camera?
It was one of the 10 K10D's which reached Romania?
I was able to play with one, just a little. Except for a small
ergonomic glitch (I think the body is too thick for my hand, but it's
nothing too serious) I liked it very much. And the SR seems
On 11/26/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You guys are killing me.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In few days the K10D should reach Romania. I'll go to see it (and to
clean/repair my *istDS, it's wheel
On 11/2/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a nice translation of the interview
Thanks!
I've posted links to the pdml archive (with your translation) on
Romanian forums, I hope you don't mind. A lot of people are interested
in this camera.
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
--
PDML
On 10/20/06, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorta like aperture simulators. ;-D
John Celio
What is an aperture simulator? Does my *istDS have one? ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 10/15/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fact is that the sensor likely has a full well capacity of about
35k electrons, yes the output signal from the CCD is analogue but the
noise on top of the wanted signal offers far less real data than a 22
bit system can resolve.
On 10/12/06, Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simple question:
How many K10D sales (total worldwide) do you
think Pentax will lose by not including the
Aperture Simulator feature?
0.
I don't think Pentax will be able to meet the demand, at only 13000 units/month.
--
Best regards,
On 9/19/06, Takeshita K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe Pentax might be the first one to adopt a superior EVF for
K1D ;-). Then again, they are still too conservative in adopting too
radical a feature as a pioneer, unlike their past.
Ken
There is no such thing as a 'superior' EVF ;)
--
On 9/19/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/9/06, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu, discombobulated, unleashed:
There is no such thing as a 'superior' EVF ;)
You'd be surprised. The CRT viewfinders on TV cameras are pretty good.
Cheers,
Cotty
When you talk about a pretty good CRT my 19
On 8/25/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the first time since I've been using Pentax on a regular basis,
there is a light at the end of the tunnel.
That's the train grin
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8/23/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/08/06, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What attitude? If you want to complain about something, I'd recommend
the stop-down coupler which is currently missing from the digital
SLRs, btw.
Actually I think
On 8/22/06, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for speed, I've tried the 350D only with the kit lens, and it didn't
strike me as being faster than what I'm used to from older film
Pentaxes. As people are reporting a somewhat significant speedup on the
K100D compared to older digital
On 8/22/06, jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not the money. It's the attitude Pentax has displayed.
Joe
What attitude? If you want to complain about something, I'd recommend
the stop-down coupler which is currently missing from the digital
SLRs, btw.
Actually I think that supporting a
On 7/16/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The clutch I played with was on the new 40mm limited pancake. It also
appears on the new primes. Someone who's played with the new zooms
will have to tell you whether or not it appears on those as well. The
clutch works on any body,
On 7/11/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny, or perhaps encouraging.
Funny? What are you talking about? Now I'll have to buy that thing! I
don't need it, of course - my DS is a wonderful camera (even if the AF
could be faster); but...
Well, time to do some shopping training with
On 6/18/06, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any ideas on current prices for this? I just searched Ebay with
no luck on current auctions.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Grr...
On 5/5/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My ancient (one of the first x2 rewriters in the country!!!) CDRW drive seems
to be expiring. Just in time for me to fill my HDD with PEF files.
I'm looking at a Philips PBDV1660G/00 DVD+-RW.
Anyone got any nasty experiences, humerous
On 5/5/06, John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... a week ago, I was in a computer store, wanting to buy a LG
4167B. Instead, I choosed a Plextor - big mistake. That Plextor - the
PX750A - is actually a very expensive Teac.
Nothing wrong with Teac they made some of the best CD
On 4/12/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to recall that if a certain converter is used on an autofocus body
with a manual lens, the lens acts like it's an autofocus optic. Is this
correct?
Shel
Yes: http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/teleconverters/F1.7X.html
--
Best regards,
Alex
On 3/19/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the Pentax D lenses that precise in their image circle coverage?
In passing (somewhere) I've read of a claimed 1.3 crop factor.
You seem certain. Do you remember where you read it?
Jack
We know they're not that precise - but I wouldn't bet
On 3/20/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex,
Can I show you an APS-H version? Explain.
I think it would be a mistake for Pentax not to price the up-coming
10MP at a level just under the D200. At the moment I don't recall the
30D pricing.
IMHO, being late to that pricing segment of
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
