Shipping a lens to Siberia, no thats cool. :)
Chad
Paul said:
I shipped my Tamron 200-500/6.3 to Siberia. US Air Mail shipping was
$40. It arrived in good condition three weeks later.
Mark,
Glad the lens made it. I'm sure you will enjoy it. BTW, were you not
taught not to gloat? :)
Chad
On 6/29/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's MINE, ALL MINE!!
Sorry. Forgot to add:
Bwahahahahahaha!
There. I feel
claims, even when insured, was a joke
from what I understand. Some just gave up trying to get their money.
It seems USPS, or any carrier for that matter, blames the carriers of
other countries and vice versa.
Chad
,
Chad
.
Thanks for looking,
Chad Richardson
with an insecticide. ;-)
That should do it.
Chad
Damn Rob, I can't have any fun. :) The Pelican cases are waterproof,
and insecticide is mostly water..shoot, I guess I'll take your
advice.
Chad
On 6/8/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been storing my lenses and bodies in Pelican/UK cases for many years and
they have done
occur by storing a lens in a Pelican case which has
foam? Has anyone heard of foam causing damage, ie possible fumes, to a
lens?
Chad Richardson
Thanks Paul P.J.
This is modern foam, ie not from the 70's :). This is the foam that is
supplied with the case from Pelican. I figure as long as the foam does
not out gas, and I keep enough silica in the case I should be alright
for use as storage. Sure would save time. :)
Chad
On 6/7/05
The CO2 blowers I use are moisture and residue free. They have been
filtered. I wonder if the pressure might cause damage?
Chad
find very little on this subject here or elsewhere on
forums. I wonder why? Have I just been lucky all this time?
Chad
I'm also currently using an inexpensive anti-static sensor cleaning
brush on my
*ist D sensor. It works OK but I have had some stubborn specs on the sensor
that needed
Thanks John. Hope you are getting some use out of that lens. :)
Chad
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:16:32 -, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having recently bought a lens from Chad, I can vouch for the quality of
his gear, and his patience in dealing with my rather complicated payment
to ship within the U.S.
Payment to be made via a instant cash Paypal transfer(I do not accept
credit cards) or by money order/cashiers check.
Send a Email if interested.
Thanks,
Chad Richardson
as how Shels's auction for a A 100/2.8 is so popular, re $$$,
my choices are the Pentax D-FA, FA, and the Tamron SP 90/2.8. I'm
still looking into the Tamron.
Any input on the D-FA will be most useful.
Thanks,
Chad
that some non-Pentax lens are good as well. Never
really considered that until now.
AF is not a requirement. It will be used mostly for macro. Next on the
list after this purchase is a regular telephoto. :) Longer than 100mm
of course.
Chad
on a digital and film bodies if it
makes a difference.
Thanks,
Chad
Windows. I work on
both platforms.
Thanks,
Chad
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:22:24 -0800 (PST), Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel,
I worked for Apple for over a decade and put a lot of time into
various aspects of the OS and Development Tools efforts for
, or
money order/cashiers check.
If interested please send Email.
Thanks,
Chad
for this reason. I bought this lens new when it
first came out. It is now useless due to no fault of my own.
Chad
Toralf Lund wrote:
Regarding my other post about zoom lenses, how about the FA28-70 AL? I
mean, what experiences do you lot have with it? How does it compare to
that other lens
.
Asking $85 plus your choice of shipping.
Thanks,
Chad
Peter,
I have a 28-70/4 that I cannot use anymore. Maybe you can use it for
parts? Just an idea. Fungus started growing on one of the back
elements. Everything else is fine on it. Don't ask me how this
happened. I have no idea.
Chad
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:25:07 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL
. It was just an idea. :) After reading the comments here,
I'm going to pickup a few more primes and keep the Pentax digital
zoom. That zoom comes in handy sometimes.
Thanks,
Chad
Thanks for info. I'll look up the lens in the archive.
Chad
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:56:03 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Monday, January 10, 2005, 1:40:41 AM, Geheim wrote:
G The comments so far do not surprise me much. It was just an idea I had
G :) I'm hoping someone that has
), are there any
other seals that should be replaced? Any tips, advice, or warnings I
should be aware of?
Thanks for any help that you can provide.
-Chad Kealey
for the back cover and the mirror cushion, are
there any other seals I should replace while I'm at it? I'd prefer to
keep disassembly to a minimum.
-Chad
25 matches
Mail list logo
