That's the one that I'm most upset about. I was
watching the Grammys. UGH!!!
--- adphoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2913439849&category=4688
> buger bugger bugger
> i was at work
>
__
Do you
Tom:
What would you sell your extra LowePro Mini Trekker
for?
Thanks,
Steve
--- tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a spare one of these if anyone wants it.
>
> --
> Thomas Van Veen Photography
> www.thomasvanveen.com
> www.bigdayphoto.com
> 301-758-3085
>
> > -Original Message
Peter:
Thanks for your response. That's very good to
know-I'm LOL! Sorry for your experience. Good thing
it (the Soligor) was given to me for free. I think I
will send it straight to the garbage can. I don't
even want to take a chance on it, especially if it
might stick to the body.
--- P
Herb,
It would be used for exactly the same thing, hiking.
What would your suggestion be?
Thanks,
Steve
--- Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Message text written by
> INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >I'm in the market for a backpack style photo bag
> that
> can hold say 2 bodies, and about
I'm in the market for a backpack style photo bag that
can hold say 2 bodies, and about 5-6 lenses. I have
not done any research, so I thought I would ask the
group. I'm sure some of you have had more experience
with these than me.
Thanks in advance!
_
Paul:
After seeing your post, I called the owner just now.
Apparently after I left the store, the guy behind the
counter pulled out some kind of special light. When
he looked inside the lens, he said it is full of mold.
He said it is basically a paper weight. So,
tomorrow, I am getting the len
Hi all,
Today I was in my local candy store, er, camera shop,
looking at their used K mount offerings, when a lady
comes in and wants to sell the above referenced lens.
She was going to get advice on pricing, but I had to
leave. I did not even know Pentax made this focal
length in the K mount.
Fred:
Are you referring to:
PENTAX - ZOOM LENSES
35-70 F4 SMC A (58) / 2 TOUCH ???
Because on Boz's site it does not mention a macro
capability. It says that the min. focussing distance
is .25 M, which I would assume is not macro?
Maybe I have the wrong lens? If so, would you mind
providing mo
I'm considering purchasing the Spotmatic SP II w/ the
55mm 1.8 lens. However, I would like to acquire the
50mm 1.4 lens, as I have heard it is one of the best
ever. Will it work with this body?
Will all of the SM/M42 lenses (including off brands)
also work with this body?
Thanks so much all!
ris at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > It is too good to be true-- I checked the guy's
> feedback and the very
> > first negative feedback I came across was a
> disgruntled buyer who negged
> > him for "not honoring the deal."
> > I suspect anyon
If I remember the focal length correctly, my vote
would be for the 25-50 zoom. I've only seen one in
the last year on ebay. Almost bought it, but had no
idea if it was a good one or not. Seems like it sold
fairly reasonably-maybe $50?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
Has anyone used Microsoft's Photo Editor? If so, I
have a few questions.
1. Is there a way to convert a color image to B&W?
2. Is there a way to "Mark up" the picture? For
instance, I want to write the date on the picture
itself, or maybe a caption, that will actually print
out on the photo?
ls in just under 4 hours, same day
> it appeared (?!)
> for less than $80 total cost?
>
> Something mighty strange here...
>
> keith whaley
>
> * * *
>
> Steve Pearson wrote:
> >
> > What about this one:
> >
> >
>
http://cgi.
Does anyone own the Y2K LX version? What does one of
those bad boys sell for?
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Peter Alling"
> Subject: Re: LX Questions
>
>
> > Forced?
>
> Well, some came along willingly..
>
> William Robb
>
___
Hi all. I'm in the market for an LX. Currently have
a Super Program & an MX. Thinking about selling both
to acquire the LX, and I have a few questions for
current LX owners.
Have I read something about the LX having some kind of
on board circutry, or computer, that helps with
exposure? Is ther
I still do not know the 35mm equivalents. I also do
not know the "peculiarities" of the 6x7 lenses. What
is your favorite 6x7 portrait lens (for the Pentax 67
of course)?
Thanks in advance.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable
Does anybody know of a good reference web site that
might list the differences between these two? Does
Boz's site?
Thanks again all!
--- Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The K1000 SE I looked at had a film speed setting
> that went up to ISO
> 3200. Not sure if this was a rolling chang
What is the difference between these two camera
bodies? Seems like the SE (or Special Edition) body
goes for less than the original?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Seems like everyone on the list already owns the
classic. Any chance someone has an extra one they
might want to part with?
Thanks in advance
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
I think you forgot some of the other costs associated
with digital in your example. What about the cost of
the printer itself? The paper & ink supplies? And
most important, the time involved to "do it yourself"?
--- Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > It still doesn't account [ ... ]
I walked away from my computer to take a d**p, and
this happens:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3001312384&category=15240
Hopefully, someone here took advantage
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Si
Thanks everyone for your help. I understand now how
to use the adapter. Now for the important question-is
it worth it? IOW, is it worth it to do this for one
lens (IE the Super Tak. 50mm, 1.4), or should I just
find an M 50mm, 1.4? Comments on image quality
differences?
Is it still easy to f
ECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:22:30 -0800 (PST), Steve
> Pearson wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is this a permanent device?
>
> Nope. It fits into the throat of the K mount and
> provides a screw
> mount. It's easiest
Hi all,
I have seen on ebay that there is some kind of adapter
that will allow me to mount screw mount lenses onto my
K mount bodies (Super Program & MX). Is this a
permanent device? How hard is it to put on-can I do
it myself? Is it easier to install on the Super
Program or the MX, or is it th
Hey Collin (or others):
What camera is that lens used with? I don't recognize
it?
Sorry for the ignorance...
--- Collin Brendemuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've given enough of them lately, it was time I got
> one.
> Don't know how long I can hold onto it these days,
> but it'll be good t
I'm still confused about 6x7 prices on ebay. Maybe
prices are falling? Was this a good deal:?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=29977&item=1950471936&rd=1
I was all set to bid & forgot to watch the clock.
Doh. I'm getting very frustrated! Oh well...
l NOT provide details to
> any person asking how
> to fit these to vehicles or how to connect these to
> car light units etc. "
>
> Hmmm, I'd had never considered using it for that. I
> would have thought you'd
> need a high GN for it to be useful.
>
> Si
Thanks,
I think I'm perfectly capable of solving such issues.
Just thought it might be fun to discuss. I thought
that's what this list was for. Oh well...
I'll try not to "bother" everyone so much in the
future.
Happy New Year!
--- John Whicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Johnston w
Alright then, that settles it! I'm definately keeping
both, atleast for awhile. Just wanted to make sure.
Thanks everyone for your thoughts!
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Keep them both. They are not that close and they are
> exceptional lenses.
> Vic
>
___
Hi again all,
I just acquired the SMC-M 28mm F/3.5 lens. I will
also soon be acquiring the SMC-M 35mm, F/3.5 lens. Do
you think it is worth keeping both focal lengths? Are
there actually times where you can say you had to have
the 28mm?
Are there any advantages of one over the other, that
wou
Are these good zooms, in terms of image quality? Is
the 28-50 a rare lens? What would be a "good deal" on
each?
Thanks again for your help!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Thanks Peter,
That's ok. I passed on it anyways, as I did not know
much about it. It ended up selling for around $92.
Did it really have an F1.5? If so, there can't be
many of those around, are there?
--- Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't see this until now, this lens is a T-
Any chance you have a phone number or a web site
address for them?
--- Altaf Shaikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Pearson wrote:
>
> >Anyone have a suggestion for where to have a CLA on
> an
> >MX? My local shops want around $185. Just
> wondering
> &
Anyone have a suggestion for where to have a CLA on an
MX? My local shops want around $185. Just wondering
if there is someone else that you have used, and can
recommend. Maybe that's a good price, but I thought I
would ask the group.
Thanks.
__
I realize this is probably a shot in the dark, but you
never know until you try.
--- Steve Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone have an extra they can sell me? Looks like
> this might be a good lens? If so, please contact
>
Any thoughts on this film? I found a roll in my bag
and might use it for some non-flash work. Will it
produce decent 8x10 enlargements?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Hi all,
I'm curios. I own the SMC-A 135mm, f2.8 lens. How do
these two compare? Which one is more sought-after?
--- Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 04:21 PM,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Had a great day of photography today shooting the
> after
Mike:
Does Photek (or anyone else for that matter) still
sell such a thing? I would be interested in a
portable system, if it came with everything, including
the stand, & it's not too espensive.
--- Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I've had great results with my baby using a black
>
Thanks Christian!
I might try that. I assume you shot it with black &
white film? Might as well also ask you which film you
used?
Thanks again.
--- Christian Skofteland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've had great results with my baby using a black
> tablecloth as a
> background. We dress her
he
> first few days,then
> around 6-7 months.
> I dont travel much now,but baby is 19 now and we
> never see
> her.Friends and all eh
> Maybe thats why she does not like her picture
> taken,not enough flash
> exposure as a child:)
>
> Dave
>
>
> Begin O
> example (just put your thumb
> over that loud coffee cup ):
>
>
<http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/derek/042902/22a.jpg>
>
> The PUG is loaded with other examples, too.
>
> t
>
> On 1/3/03 11:30 AM, Steve Pearson wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking of going w
So, I'm still confused. Which is the best-the K, M,
or A 50mm 1.4???
--- Andre Langevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >It appears that Pentax makes both a 50 F1.4 SMC
> (52mm filter) and a
> >50 F1.4 SMC-M (49mm filter). Which one is better
> optically, bui
What does a Pentax A 100/2.8 Macro go for these days?
--- Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, strictly speaking it's not a lens by itself,
> but Vivitar's
> > Macro Focusing 2x TC is a handy piece of
> equipment. It's a great
> > combination of quality, price and utility and can
> be found
I'm interested in looking at sample photos of flowers,
close ups (i.e. w/ macro lens), shot in B&W. Anyone
have any personal favorites, or a web site to refer me
to?
Thanks all!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up no
Well,
I could not hold back making the first purchase of the
new year. So, I went w/ the 50mm 1.4 K version, or so
I think:
http://www.keh.com/shop/SHOWPRODUCT.CFM?CRID=4302990&SKID=PK0699900172906&SID=newused&BID=PK&CID=06&SOID=N&ISPRICE=76.0
Thanks again for all the input. Looking forward t
I could only have one, I'd keep the K.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> William in Utah.
>
> 1/1/2003 11:46:17 AM, "Steve Pearson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >It appears that Pentax makes both a 50 F1.4 SMC
> (52mm
> >filter) and a 50 F1.4
so
> much cleaner than
> all my other 50 f/1.4s, I put it on my newly
> acquired MX, where it
> will stay for a while... good combo, IMHO.
>
> keith whaley
>
> Mark Roberts wrote:
> >
> > Steve Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >I
Fred,
tell me more about the SMC, K, 55 f1.8 lens-do you
have this exact lens? If so, how do you like it?
Does a price of $39 sound about right for this lens
(in good condition)?
Thanks,
Steve
--- Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Isn't the 55 f1.8 lens that you like a screw
> mount? If it
I would like to know, from all of you whom I know have
taken a lot more pictures than I have, what is your
favorite manual focus, K mount, macro lens for flower
close ups?
Thanks again!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign
Actually, I have an MX as well, that needs a 50mm
lens. So, my Super Program has the A 1.7 & I thought
I might try to find an M 1.4 for the MX. Anyone have
one for sale? Then, I could always swap the two back
& forth.
--- gfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yOn Tue, 31 Dec 20
Hey Bob,
Isn't the 55 f1.8 lens that you like a screw mount?
If it is available in the K mount, I would consider
looking for one of these as well.
--- Bob Rapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Fred,
> There are some among us that prefer the 55 f1.8.
> The tests were
> conducted with colour n
gt; (guess). Possible light leak past mirror during
> exposure?
>
> Regards,
> Bob
>
> "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be
> happy!"
>- Benjamin Franklin
>
> From: &
oes.
> Regards and enjoy the square waste!!! ;-)
>
> Albano
>
>
> --- Steve Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > As the originator of this thread, all of you will
> be
> > happy to know that I did purchase the Yashica Mat
> LM
> > to begin
As the originator of this thread, all of you will be
happy to know that I did purchase the Yashica Mat LM
to begin my journey into MF. I have really enjoyed
everyone's comments about the 6x6 format (and others).
Although it is not a Pentax (hopefully it will be
someday soon), I would appreciate a
Hi all, another quick question for all you MX owners.
I just picked one up, and find that the light meter is
reading -1 stop, as compared to my trusty Super
Program, with the same lens on both bodies. Is this
normal? Or, is the meter off and I should just know
to adjust for every shot? Should I
rmat
> camera. Mind you, if you want ~real~ cheap, you
> could go Holga .
>
> Anyway, just a thought, before you take the plunge
> and join the
> Brotherhood...
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
> Steve Pearson wrote:
>
> > I'm still on the hunt for a Mediu
I'm still on the hunt for a Medium Format setup. I
would like to hear suggestions from the group. Which
format is best-645, 67? What about 6x6 (I don't think
Pentax makes one, but they're probably the least
expensive to start with). But, in terms of Pentax,
which format do you prefer and why?
Good advice Mishka,
Now, how about a scanner for the negatives? Any
suggestions out there for a good scanner in the $500
range, that produces good results for prints up to
8x10, from negatives?
Thanks again
--- Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is quite normal to have prints completely sc
Nope, I passed also, waiting for more input. I knew
it would be gone by morning.
Thanks for not buying it out from under me. It's nice
to know the pact is strong!
Sorry you did not get it...
--- Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at
I just got back 1 roll of Kodak Portra 160NC prints, &
1 roll of Fuji Astia pro. slides. Both rolls had
numerous portraits/candids of my family. Both were
shot with the same camera & lens. The slides seem to
be much more consistent with the flash. Some of the
prints show a little more "white ou
Dan-
Did you get it?
--- Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 12:30 AM, Steve
> Pearson wrote:
> >
> > Is it a good deal? Once you see it, promise you
> won't
> > buy it out from me :)
> >
> >
&g
No, I did not. I decided to let it go until I heard
more responses from the group. My own fault. I was
looking at up until about 11PM west coast & I knew it
would be sold by morning, east coast time. I checked
it at 7:30AM & it looks like it sold at 6:30AM, PST.
Oh well, hopefully another one
iations of bodies & lenses well
enough, but I sure appreciate your help.
--- Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Steve Pearson wrote:
>
> > OK, I'm giving serious thought to this:
> [snip]
> > Is it a good deal? Once you see
OK, I'm giving serious thought to this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3353&item=1946358582&rd=1
Is it a good deal? Once you see it, promise you won't
buy it out from me :)
Thanks for any input...
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo!
Hello all. I have fallen in love w/ Kodak 160NC! I
just hate to pay $9.00 per roll. I'm sure there are
numerous on line places to order film. I would like
to hear your input about your past experiences
ordering online. I have heard about some sites
selling imported film & not "US" film. This
nt,
> a counter-clockwise twist cocks the timer and
> exposes the little pin that
> starts the timer buzzing. But twist that lever
> clockwise and the lens will
> stop down.
>
> Steve Pearson wrote:
> >
> > I have read that the MX has a depth of field
> preview.
I have read that the MX has a depth of field preview.
I just purchased an MX & can not find it. How does it
work? Can anyone help me?
Thanks!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
I've heard that they don't last very long?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> B&H sells Zinc-air versions of the Px625 by wein for
> a little more than 4
> bucks a pop.
>
> - Brendan
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
> To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow t
Hey all. I realize this might be slightly off topic.
However, I have recently acquired some older
rangefinder cameras that use the mercury 625
batteries. Does anyone know of a source to purchase
these? Is it legal to ship them to me in the US?
Any chance a list member might have some for sa
That's way cool! Talk about perfect timing!
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://rense.com/general8/boom.htm
> --
> Shel Belinkoff
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
> To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
asked, I guess I have to tell
> you that it's an
> 85/1.8. Might be gone by now.
> Paul
>
> Steve Pearson wrote:
> >
> > Paul:
> >
> > Thanks for the info. I'm not sure I understand
> which
> > lens was available on Ebay with a good BI
quite as
> good. Some exceptions to this rule can be found
> among the Vivitar Series
> 1 lenses. But I'd focus my attention on hunting some
> of these down. One
> of those I mentioned was seen on ebay this afternoon
> with a good buy it
> now price.
> Paul
>
> Ste
s.
> My favorite SMC lens I use on my ES cameras is the
> 35mm f2. I also like the
> 24mm. For a tele lens I like the 300mm f4. Before
> eBay, a lens that took
> me awhile to locate is the 15mm SMC Takumar.
> Occasionally it appears on
> eBay.
> Jim A.
>
> > Fro
Hello all-I just picked up a Spotmatic "F" & know
nothing about the screw lenses for this camera as I
currently own a Super Program. I would very much
appreciate your responses-what lenses are the best,
rarest, etc.?
How good are the "Off-brand" lenses. A quick look on
Ebay has Jupiter 9 (Rus
Well, I don't know much about the Canon line up of
cameras, but somebody told me the other day that they
make a camera that can shoot both digital & 35mm film.
If that's true (maybe that's true for all DSLR's?),
than that's what I want from Pentax! I would probably
sell everything to get my hand
Thanks everyone for your quick responses-I have placed
my order!
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Steve Pearson
> Subject: Adorama?
>
>
> > Has anyone purchased from this internet site? I'm
> > conside
Has anyone purchased from this internet site? I'm
considering ordering some Fuji Reala film and just
wanted to make sure they are reliable and trustworthy?
B&H is currently out of stock.
Thanks for any input!
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
-
This
I have a Super Program & think this would be the best
flash for my camera. I currently have the 200T, but
would like something with a lilttle more power &
bounce capability.
Anyone out there have one for sale? Or, is there
another flash I should consider? I think I should be
looking only at Pe
I just paid $4.79 for a roll of 24 exp. at my local
store. It seems that Adorama & B&H sell 35mm Reala in
a 36 exposure roll for $2.39 each. I know I will pay
more for shipping, but if I buy 10 rolls I will save
some money.
Just curious-does anyone know of a better price on the
internet?
TIA,
Yes, I'm excited about "playing" with this camera. My
first roll was 200 & I did not know about the camera
only reading 100 & 400 speeds. I can find the 400
speed here in my town. Does anyone have access to the
100 speed film, anywhere in the world (I wonder)?
Guess I'm limited to 400.
Also
Just picked up one of these beauties, waiting for
first roll of film to come back. Some questions for
the group-
1. Is this camera really capable of good-great
results? I've heard lots of talk, can't wait to test
it out. I have the 24 & the 50 lenses. What lenses
are your favorite? If some
Just picked up one of these beauties, waiting for
first roll of film to come back. Some questions for
the group-
1. Is this camera really capable of good-great
results? I've heard lots of talk, can't wait to test
it out. I have the 24 & the 50 lenses. What lenses
are your favorite? If some
Dave:
I have the Lumiquest Pocket Bounce myself, mounted on
the 283. The 285 has the moving head for TELE, NORM,
or WIDE setting. Does that mess up the Pocket Bounce?
Does it fall off? Where did you mount the velcro,
for best performance?
Thanks-can't wait to try it!
--- David Brooks <[EMAI
Ann:
Thanks for the info. Just curious-did the 28mm
diffuser come with the flash when you bought it? Or
is that an accessory item you purchased later? The
reason that I ask is that I can see where there is a
slot to put it, but mine does not have the diffuser
itself. Is that something that I
, take a look here:
>
>
>
http://primco.org/photo/galleries/vivitar_285_manual/
>
> You ought to be able to figure it out with this.
>
> Len
> ---
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Steve Pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax
I'm going on a trip soon & might want to buy a good
zoom (I know that might be an oxymoron for some
people). However, for the sake of travelling
light...Does anyone have a favorite SMC-A lens that
takes great pictures and is a good focal length for
all-around picture taking?
Thanks for any sug
Hey all. Picked up a Mamiya/Sekor 1000TL w/ 55mm 1.8
lens, case, & strap. Everything works on it,
including meter, self timer, etc. Just needs a little
clean up. The lens is a Memiya/Sekor brand. Just
wondering first of all if I got a good deal. Paid
$47. I did not see any listed on KEH's s
Might be able to buy this today: Pentax SP1000 for
$50-Is this a good deal? Is it a "Good" spotmatic?
Thanks for any input...
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spotmatic F, because it allows open aperture
> metering with the SMC Tak lenses.
> Paul
I have so many questions about the Spots, but so
little time. Why are they so liked by everyone? Did
someone say that Mamiya & Nikon lenses will work with
this camera? Is that why they are so popular-even
more lenses to find on the used market?
It appears that they are well built also, as so
Wow, is that ever depressing. Reminds me of the ME
special edition w/ the 40mm pancake for $50 that I
recently passed up. Went back the next day to get it
and of course it was gone by then.
:(((
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: S
Just out of curiousity, what was the buy it now price?
I missed it also :(
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't believe I missed this one. I was watching
> ebay for new items
> today. And how about the rest of you brothers? Was
> everyone sleeping.
> Yes, it's a 67 package, a
--- David Chang-Sang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Used K1000 ($120 US)
> Used Pentax Digital Spot Meter ($175 US)
>
> That's what I currently use for spot metering... and
> metal body :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
Do you have a recommendation for a Pentax Digital spot
meter-which model wer
Why not just buy a Pentax Spotmeter to use with your
> favorite bodies?
>
>
> Bruce Dayton
OK, OK, maybe that's an alternative. Still means
extra equipment to carry around. Why didn't they ever
make one? Just curious..
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Hi all-Sorry for the simiar post again.
I can't believe it-Pentax never made a metal body that
has spot metering? I think it really bites that I
have to spend $800 on an MZ-S?
Any other suggestions out there?
Thanks for the help...still searching...
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with Turbo
Did you get it off Ebay, private party, or local
camera store?
Thanks for the info.-that was the camera that I bid on
today! Now that I know what you paid for yours, I'm
glad I didn't win it.
Thanks again!
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
-
This message is
Thanks for all the help with the Ricoh info. I bid on
one on Ebay & lost it. Oh well-probably a good sign.
Still, I can't believe that there is not one older
Pentax brand body style that has spot metering???
Come on, please, some one tell me there is one. Or
else, I might be forced to get the
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Steve Pearson wrote:
> > Sorry, one more question for ZX 5N owners. I
> would
> > prefer to buy this camera without the date back,
> but
> > it seems that every dealer in the US sells it with
> the
> > date back?
Sorry, one more question for ZX 5N owners. I would
prefer to buy this camera without the date back, but
it seems that every dealer in the US sells it with the
date back? Has anyone found a place to buy one
without the date back?
Thanks for your help!
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
I am giving serious thought to this camera. I guess,
based on the responses to my post, there are no older
metal-style bodies that have spot metering? I was
hoping to maybe save a few $'s.
thanks again.
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I think I would recommend the ZX
...
--- "Paul F. Stregevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Steve Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it me, or is the Ricoh XR-M a copy of the SF1n?
>
> It's you, Steve. If you've ever peered through an
> XR-M, you'd know what I
> mean.
101 - 200 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
