e:
I was going to take a few night photos in a location where I didn't want to
risk the K-5II or even the K20D, so I put a set new of Litniam disposables
into the old *ist-Ds. Well the damned camera won't turn on. Tested the
batteries and all were with specification for the camera to t
t a set new of Litniam disposables
> into the old *ist-Ds. Well the damned camera won't turn on. Tested the
> batteries and all were with specification for the camera to turn on.
> Cleaned the battery contacts, (using a rubber eraser), still no joy.
> Dragged out the external pow
I was going to take a few night photos in a location where I didn't want
to risk the K-5II or even the K20D, so I put a set new of Litniam
disposables into the old *ist-Ds. Well the damned camera won't turn
on. Tested the batteries and all were with specification for the camera
Ok so it seems that almost no one has any thoughts about this and
unfortunately everything suggested I've tried. I guess I'll have to
keep my Ds with out batteries, and remember to take them out when I'm
done. Thanks to everyone who replied.
On 9/8/2011 2:47 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Yes I kn
On 9/8/2011 3:43 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-09-08 2:47 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Yes I know the Ds is hopelessly outdated, but I've been using it as
my backup/carry anywhere camera, and until recently it was serving
admirably. Now however it's acquired a new annoying behavior, to
wit, after
That's the problem, it was turned off. I put the batteries in just
before Irene hit and picked up the camera today. batteries were flat
lined. This is the third time something similar happened.
On 9/8/2011 3:28 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
My ist*Ds was always decent in terms of battery
On 11-09-08 2:47 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Yes I know the Ds is hopelessly outdated, but I've been using it as my
backup/carry anywhere camera, and until recently it was serving
admirably. Now however it's acquired a new annoying behavior, to wit,
after loading a new set of lithium batteries it
My ist*Ds was always decent in terms of battery life.
One spare set of lithiums is all I ever carried.
How about when you turn the camera off?
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Yes I know the Ds is hopelessly outdated, but I've been using it as my
Yes I know the Ds is hopelessly outdated, but I've been using it as my
backup/carry anywhere camera, and until recently it was serving
admirably. Now however it's acquired a new annoying behavior, to wit,
after loading a new set of lithium batteries it will totally drain them,
in less than a w
On Feb 18, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I have an *istDS with a bad "sensor unit" according to CRIS, who
> wanted $380 to replace the "unit". It wil show images but if you try
> to take a shot it's just black. (I opted instead to get a refurbished
> E-PL1 for $340
> Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 08:12:02
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: FS Friday- Bad *ist DS
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> I have
You got me on that. I actually paused to think about it for a second.
-Original Message-
From: David J Brooks
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 08:12:02
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: FS Friday- Bad *ist DS
On Fri, Feb
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I have an *istDS with a bad "sensor unit" according to CRIS, who
> wanted $380 to replace the "unit". It will show images but if you try
> to take a shot it's just black.
Use it for night photography
Dave
>
> --
> Steve
Hey Guys,
I have an *istDS with a bad "sensor unit" according to CRIS, who
wanted $380 to replace the "unit". It wil show images but if you try
to take a shot it's just black. (I opted instead to get a refurbished
E-PL1 for $340). It is useless to me but it would be a source of
parts. Pay for
Again, my response below only acknowledges some of the responses to this
question, all of which were helpful.
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:21 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>> On 7/2/2010 9:55 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that when using lenses designed for the 35mm frame
>> the fie
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Just clarifying a point. Some replies have mentioned a 'green button'.
> The DS doesn't have a green button as such but the AE-L button on the
> back of the camera performs similar functions.
> Another point in case it hasn't been mentioned.
Again, my response below only acknowledges some of the responses to this
question, all of which were helpful.
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:21 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>> On 7/2/2010 9:55 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that when using lenses designed for the 35mm frame
>> the fie
75mm on
> > 35mm, a 30-35mm lens is now normal. Pentax's little 18-55 is a pretty
> > good little lens for the money.
>
> Actually, that was on the "Prayer Service at St. Michaels" thread, but
> since my decision to go with a *ist DS I've been communicating w
--
From: "Eric Weir"
Subject: Re: *ist DS
Do I understand correctly that when using lenses designed for the 35mm
frame the field of view through the viewfinder, and not just in the
recorded image, will be 1.5 times what it would be
Actually, that was on the "Prayer Service at St. Michaels" thread, but since my
decision to go with a *ist DS I've been communicating with the list through that thread,
I changed the subject heading.
Do I understand correctly that when using lenses designed for the 35mm frame
t
0-35mm lens is now normal. Pentax's little 18-55 is a pretty
>> good little lens for the money.
>
> Actually, that was on the "Prayer Service at St. Michaels" thread, but since
> my decision to go with a *ist DS I've been communicating with the list
> throug
; good little lens for the money.
Actually, that was on the "Prayer Service at St. Michaels" thread, but since my
decision to go with a *ist DS I've been communicating with the list through
that thread, I changed the subject heading.
Do I understand correctly that when using lenses
Yes my own stupidity. I put a new set of set of disposable lithium
batteries into the *ist-Ds, didn't turn the camera off and placed it in
such a way that the shutter button stayed half depressed for, oh I don't
know, for at least the amount of time to drain the batteries... Da
Thanks Bob! Just downloaded!
lf
Bob Sullivan escreveu:
Luiz,
If you can find a manual for the *ist DS2, that is written with the
2.0 software in mind.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Luiz Felipe wrote:
Well, after a long battle my DS arrived home. Alive and kicking, quickly
Mail List
Subject: Re: *ist DS arrived home
Luiz,
If you can find a manual for the *ist DS2, that is written with the
2.0 software in mind.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Luiz Felipe wrote:
> Well, after a long battle my DS arrived home. Alive and kicking, quickly
> demolish
Luiz,
If you can find a manual for the *ist DS2, that is written with the
2.0 software in mind.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Luiz Felipe wrote:
> Well, after a long battle my DS arrived home. Alive and kicking, quickly
> demolished a set of ancient NiMH from Rayovac or somethi
Well, after a long battle my DS arrived home. Alive and kicking, quickly
demolished a set of ancient NiMH from Rayovac or something like that...
currently working on a set of Philips NiMH 2300 mAH, and accepting
gladly kingston 2GB SD cards. But that's after the firmware upgrade to 2.02.
Works
From: Cotty
On 13/7/09, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The IstDS may be one of those where you have to use the stand-alone DNG
>converter to get it into CS.
Camera Raw 2.4 did the trick John.
Good.
Adobe's site used to have what cameras were supported by what version of
ACR, a
On 13/7/09, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The IstDS may be one of those where you have to use the stand-alone DNG
>converter to get it into CS.
Camera Raw 2.4 did the trick John.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnap
l.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
John Sessoms
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:26 PM
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax *ist Ds RAW file - which CAMERA RAW for original,
CS?
The IstDS may be one of those where you have to use the stand-alone DNG
converter to get it into CS.
--
The IstDS may be one of those where you have to use the stand-alone DNG
converter to get it into CS.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
d J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Have you found a copy. I have what i think is the correct version
>>here, but not 100% sure. Its a file from 2006 so it may be if you need
>>it.
>
> Thanks Dave, I downloaded 2.4 from the Adobe website and it handles the
> PE
photog he is assigned to has a 1D mark III.
Stef is not impressed with the *ist Ds speed - but I did tell him that
he would be on steam power with it instead of the Dilithium-Crystal-
powered warp drive of the 1D cameras!
He's making do though - we had a heads-together session last night about
Cotty
Have you found a copy. I have what i think is the correct version
here, but not 100% sure. Its a file from 2006 so it may be if you need
it.
Dave
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 8/7/09, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>2,4 also fully supports DNG so it can be us
On 8/7/09, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>2,4 also fully supports DNG so it can be used in concert with Adobe
>DNG converter to process RAW files from any camera supported by any
>version of ACR.
Thanks Adam.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||
a RAW for
> Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds ?
>
> Appreciate it.
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
> ||=| http://www.cottysnaps.com
> _
>
>
>
> --
> PD
ACR 2.4 works with istDS and photoshop CS.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Home Page - www.jchriso.com
Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list -
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml
m,
can anyone point me in the direction of which version of Camera RAW for
Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds ?
Appreciate it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai
Turned out to be 2.4 - anything beyond 3.0 won't work with CS, but has
to be CS2.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/li
On 8/7/09, paul stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I believe 2.7 is the last version of ACR Adobe released for PSCS. I
>know it supported the *istD, not sure about the DS.
Thanks Paul, will try.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.c
I believe 2.7 is the last version of ACR Adobe released for PSCS. I
know it supported the *istD, not sure about the DS.
Paul
On Jul 8, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Cotty wrote:
Hi team,
can anyone point me in the direction of which version of Camera RAW
for
Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds
On 8/7/09, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Hi team,
>
>can anyone point me in the direction of which version of Camera RAW for
>Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds ?
>
>Appreciate it.
OOPS- version 2.x and got it on my Mac :-)
sorry.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Hi team,
can anyone point me in the direction of which version of Camera RAW for
Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds ?
Appreciate it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax
The DS2 has a 2.5" LCD and slightly faster SD write speeds as well as
a few extra options in the firmware. The DS has a 2.0" LCD. The
firmware changes were given to the DS as well in v2.0 of the DS
firmware. So they're essentially identical. The Samsung GX-1S is a DS2
with slightly different firmwa
DS2 Has bigger LCD and is much much harder to find.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Nick Wright
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 9:35 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: ist ds and ds2?
What ar
What are the differences between those two models? Thanks.
--
~Nick David Wright
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the direct
Well, as the title says I'm looking for some items, and would rather
deal with list members in the US, since I'll be speeding trough Florida
in april (no, not from april 1st). Here it comes:
1) *ist DS or DS2 camera in fair/ good/ excellent condition, mirror/
finder/ sensor in perfe
ll work better.
If the amount of energy in those things would be equal to the amount of
energy used discussing their use... :-)
LF
William Robb escreveu:
- Original Message - From: "Brian Walters"
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
I'm with you, Charles.
I'v
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Walters"
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
I'm with you, Charles.
I've tried numerous brands and the Eneloops have proven to be far
superior to any of them in practice.
If others have had different experience, fine. Use
Derby Chang escreveu:
Hi Luiz,
I popped a 16GB SDHC A-Data card into my *ist-DS I leave at work
(powered happily by Eneloops, BTW). Other than the frame counter
showing 999, it all works fine.
D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.n
oun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 8:47 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: *ist DS storage question
I've had some experience with NiMH and a good battery charger
with
my -DS although no Eneloops (yet). I've had two differ
ergy.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
JC OConnell
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 8:45 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: *ist DS storage question
yup, far superior if you
t lose much going with
the DS/ DS2. Comments?
Thanks in advance.
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
http://techmit.com.br/luizfelipe/
Hi Luiz,
I popped a 16GB SDHC A-Data card into my *ist-DS I leave at work
(powered happily by Eneloops, BTW). Other than the frame counter showing
99
fish!
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Brian Walters
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:24 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
I'm with you, Char
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:24:15PM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
>
> Ignore JCO, get the Eneloops and be happy.
Now *there's* a T-shirt slogan if ever I saw one ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
I'm with you, Charles.
I've tried numerous brands and the Eneloops have proven to be far
superior to any of them in practice.
If others have had different experience, fine. Use what works best for
you.
Having said that, I'm impressed with the non-rechargeable Energisers
that came with the K20
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Robinson"
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
On Jan 6, 2009, at 21:48, JC OConnell wrote:
I dont make blind assertions, and I assert you
are a fool.
OK. I'll take that label.
"Blind Assertions"? SCREW YOU.
I
l-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Charles Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 10:56 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
On Jan 6, 2009, at 21:48, JC OConnell wrote:
>
> I dont make blind assertions, and I assert you
> are a fool.
On Jan 6, 2009, at 21:48, JC OConnell wrote:
I dont make blind assertions, and I assert you
are a fool.
OK. I'll take that label.
"Blind Assertions"? SCREW YOU.
If you're just reading charts and not using them (and people said
"what should I use?" not "what do the graphs say?") then you
t] On Behalf Of
Charles Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 10:24 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
On Jan 6, 2009, at 17:50, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Brian Walters wrote:
>> Re rechargeable batteries. It's been said before here but worth
>
I get by just fine with Energizer 2100 mah thank you. But then again,
what do I know.
Bill
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2009, at 17:50, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> Brian Walters wrote:
>>>
>>> Re rechargeable batteries. It's been said before here but worth
nnell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Charles Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 10:24 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
On Jan 6, 2009, at 17:50, Bruce Walker wrote:
&g
On Jan 6, 2009, at 17:50, Bruce Walker wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
Re rechargeable batteries. It's been said before here but worth
repeating that Sanyo Eneloops are far superior to most other
rechargeables.
Uh, oh. Fire in the hole!
Ignore JCO, get the Eneloops and be happy.
If you don'
iginal Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
JC OConnell
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 8:45 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: *ist DS storage question
yup, far superior if you value charging but not using your batteries for
mont
l.net] On Behalf Of
Bruce Walker
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:50 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
Brian Walters wrote:
> Re rechargeable batteries. It's been said before here but worth
> repeating that Sanyo Eneloops are far superi
Brian Walters wrote:
Re rechargeable batteries. It's been said before here but worth
repeating that Sanyo Eneloops are far superior to most other
rechargeables.
Uh, oh. Fire in the hole!
:-)
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I think you'll find the DS a pleasant camera to use. Were it not for
the lack of shake reduction, I may have delayed upgrading.
Re rechargeable batteries. It's been said before here but worth
repeating that Sanyo Eneloops are far superior to most other
rechargeables. They just go on and on.
Again, thanks for facts and ideas. I don't believe in large baskets as ideal
media to carry eggs, but then there are moments when the extra space is useful.
I seem to need changing film at the worst moments, sometimes, and using 2 or
4gb SDHC cards would allow me to change the cards at ease, not
The DS is quite at home using SHDC cards. I don't use them because 180+
pictures on a card are more than enough eggs in one basket for me.
-Original Message-
>From: Luiz Felipe
>Sent: Jan 5, 2009 10:54 PM
>To: pdml@pdml.net
>Subject: *ist DS storage question
>
>
Of Luiz
Felipe
Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2009 14:54
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: *ist DS storage question
I spent a few days with very limited internet access, and was unable to keep
up with the photos posted - I'm going to look them over the next days, but
usually they come just great -
Luiz,
Can't say about SDHC cards ov over 2Gig in the DS or DS2.
I will say that I enjoyed the extra pixels after moving from a DS to a K10D.
That and the shake reduction are worth it.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Luiz Felipe wrote:
> I spent a few days with very limited intern
I spent a few days with very limited internet access, and was unable to keep up
with the photos posted - I'm going to look them over the next days, but usually
they come just great - so I bet I won't be disappointed... the comments alone
are very interesting. :-)
I'm considering my digital opti
The good news is the speed of the card won't really matter with the
*ist-D. The bad news is the speed of the card won't really matter...
Steve Larson wrote:
> i am happy, silvio's took the ist ds back, and gave me the ist d instead,
> straight across. I'm taking it t
The ist d is of better build quality. I think you'll like it. I had
two of them and never had a problem with either one through many
thousands of photos.
Paul
On May 16, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Steve Larson wrote:
> i am happy, silvio's took the ist ds back, and gave me the ist
i am happy, silvio's took the ist ds back, and gave me the ist d instead,
straight across. I'm taking it to
Dean's on monday for a thorough go-through. thanks everyone for all your
help, i love
this place :) dean is going to sell me a 4 gig cf card for $50 :)
steve
ROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
>
>
>> If it's an *ist DS2 you should go for it.
>> -- Original message --
>> From: "St
hiya adam, thank you sir. i feel i am loaded with both barrels to barter
now.
steve
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
> The D
;Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 6:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
>
>
>
>> On the other hand, if the more expensive camera is an *ist DL you
>> might want to pass. That camera is newer but it doesn't have a prism
>> viewfind
The first couple of times I downloaded pictures from my *ist-D I used
the card reader built into an HP Photosmart 7250 supposedly USB 2.0
compatible, which it is, but it downloads at USP 1.0 speeds. I figured
anything had to be faster so I used the USB cable that came with the
camera until I c
Mail List"
>
>
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 6:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
>
>
> > On the other hand, if the more expensive camera is an *ist DL you
> > might want to pass. That camera is newer but it doesn't have a prism
> > viewfin
bject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
> On the other hand, if the more expensive camera is an *ist DL you
> might want to pass. That camera is newer but it doesn't have a prism
> viewfinder. An *ist D might also be more expensive than a DS, but the
> write speed -- the speed at whi
; To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
>
>
>> If it's an *ist DS2 you should go for it.
>> -- Original message --
>> From: "Steve Larson" &
writes that down.
steve
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
> If it's an *ist DS2 you should go for it.
> -- Original message --
If it's an *ist DS2 you should go for it.
-- Original message --
From: "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> maybe, but it was a model with more features
>
> >
> > Maybe now you know why the one you bought was a hundred dollars less
> >
> > William Robb
>
>
maybe, but it was a model with more features
>
> Maybe now you know why the one you bought was a hundred dollars less
>
> William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Larson"
Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
> hi bill, i will. i'm going to actually try and swing a deal, there was
> another used ist down
> at the camera shop where i bought it, it was another $100 more expensive.
> Ma
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Larson"
> Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
>
>
>> no sir, don't have one. bu
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Larson"
Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
> no sir, don't have one. but from the sounds of it, i need one
>
Get the camera fixed anyway. If the USB port is buggered, something else
related might fail
ofter the warranty
no sir, don't have one. but from the sounds of it, i need one
thanks paul, dave
steve
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
> Do you have a card
Do you have a card reader? You don't really need (or want) to use the camera to
download. I've never done that in five years of shooting digital.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well, seems like the camera shorted or something
I never used it either, thats why you have it.
LOL
Steve, i have 6 dlsr's and have never plugged them in to a computer.
Sandisk usb 2 card reader(six kinds i think) and works great.
Dave
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:06 PM, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:08 P
Thank Knarf!
if all else fails i will get a card reader, and thanks for the kind words :)
steve
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Taking back the
frank theriault writes:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> (sorry for no caps and quick typing, i'm recovering from rotator cuff
>> surgery and am typing with my right hand
>> only, and i'm left handed, lol)
>
> I've never had surgery, but I did brea
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (sorry for no caps and quick typing, i'm recovering from rotator cuff
> surgery and am typing with my right hand
> only, and i'm left handed, lol)
I've never had surgery, but I did break my left collarbone in two
places, a
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cool, thanks charles !!
>
> steve
> (sorry for no caps and quick typing, i'm recovering from rotator cuff
> surgery and am typing with my right hand
> only, and i'm left handed, lol)
I'm with the other two. I didn't get a
cuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
> On May 15, 2008, at 14:47, Steve Larson wrote:
>
>> Well, seems like the camera shorted or something, the second I plug
>> the
>> cable in to DL the pics, I get a message
>&g
On May 15, 2008, at 14:47, Steve Larson wrote:
> Well, seems like the camera shorted or something, the second I plug
> the
> cable in to DL the pics, I get a message
> on the computer saying that the USB port is overloaded, I tried it on
> another machine too, same thing :(((
>
Here comes m
2008 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Taking back the ist ds
> If you got it cheap enough, I'd just ignore the USB port entirely and
> use a card reader instead. The only time I ever used the USB port of
> a Pentax DSLR was to see if the Pentax Remote Assistant worked with
> the K10D. It wor
If you got it cheap enough, I'd just ignore the USB port entirely and
use a card reader instead. The only time I ever used the USB port of
a Pentax DSLR was to see if the Pentax Remote Assistant worked with
the K10D. It worked, that was the last time I plugged it in.
Card readers are much be
Well, seems like the camera shorted or something, the second I plug the
cable in to DL the pics, I get a message
on the computer saying that the USB port is overloaded, I tried it on
another machine too, same thing :(((
Steve
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/
1 - 100 of 1687 matches
Mail list logo
