: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
I only recntly discovered presoak, now for some reason
my neg are cleaner.
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
Subject: OT: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
Seeing as how I belong to both PDML and the HUG, I
I too recently started presoaking, but I really began to believe in it when
I processed some APX 100 and after the presoak the water came out blue. I
developed the negatives in D-76 and they were beautiful.
Evan
Brendan wrote:
I only recntly discovered presoak, now for some reason
my neg
Thanks Mr. Robb.I just threw out a filter, Do'h.Back to
the Britag
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:31:12 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
- Original Message -
From: David
does the trick.
tv
-Original Message-
From: David Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
Thanks Mr. Robb.I just threw out a filter, Do'h.Back to
the Britag
Dave
Good to know Tom.The water up here in Dave and Brendan country is VERY
hard.Fouled up a 40 gallon gas water heater in 14 months.Furnace humidifier last just
one season.
As i am probably only going to procces 2-3 rolls per month uuntil
summer horse season,i was planning on using the bring
- Original Message -
From: tom
Subject: RE: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
How do you know that stuff isn't supposed to be present when
developing?
The blue dye that washes out is the anti halation layer, and perhaps some
sensitizing dyes. Once the film is exposed, it has done
Seeing as how I belong to both PDML and the HUG, I was wondering if anyone
had comments on this.
I personally try to pre-soak everything but apparently (at least from the
HUG) it looks as though pre-soaking is not done by some.. and vehemently
opposed by others.
What does everyone else think?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Seeing as how I belong to both PDML and the HUG, I was
wondering if anyone
had comments on this.
I personally try to pre-soak everything but apparently (at
least from the
HUG) it looks as though pre-soaking is
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally try to pre-soak everything but apparently (at least from the
HUG) it looks as though pre-soaking is not done by some.. and vehemently
opposed by others.
When I was in highschool photo, we were taught to presoak..I still do. For
about a
, but once I started using
de-ionised water instead, the recommended development times suddenly
began to make sense... :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:10 PM
Subject: OT: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
10 matches
Mail list logo
