Anyone here ever consider the images from these lenses to be harsh? (A description
given by someone on rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
On 9 Jun 2004 at 14:32, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Anyone here ever consider the images from these lenses to be harsh? (A
description given by someone on rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
Only accurate, if the shooter was used to the output of crap zooms then I guess
that could be their perception
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl
Subject: 31/77 Harsh?
Anyone here ever consider the images from these lenses to be
harsh? (A description given by someone on
rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
They are both certainly amoung the sharper, contrastier lenses I ave
owned.
I don't
Wide opened, the 77 beats my 85/1.8D, and overall the 77 has more '3D'
look than the Nikon. So the 77 is harsh for portrait, but superb in
general.
Andy Chang took me to a Pentax store in Taipei (thanks Andy!!!) and I
got a 50/1.4 FA. After some testing, I must say this is one sharp lens
(just
You are very welcome Winston!
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 31/77 Harsh?
Wide opened, the 77 beats my 85/1.8D, and overall the 77 has
more '3D' look than the Nikon. So
Perhaps I should clarify. By soft I did not mean less sharp, but the
milky appearance. I don't know the proper way/word to describe it though.
:-(
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Wide opened, the 77 beats my 85/1.8D, and overall the 77 has more '3D'
look than the Nikon. So the
Some of my Nikons are too contrasty, so I know what you meant :)
Sometimes that's how Nikon got that 'very sharp' look, but when I
scanned the film, the resolution is somewhat disappointing - but does
not apply to all of them, though.
I used Nikon for 6 yrs before the first Pentax, and I found
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan
Subject: RE: 31/77 Harsh?
Perhaps I should clarify. By soft I did not mean less sharp, but
the
milky appearance. I don't know the proper way/word to describe it
though.
:-(
I think the 77 has very strong micro contrast, for lack of a better
term
On 9 Jun 2004 at 20:53, William Robb wrote:
I think the 77 has very strong micro contrast, for lack of a better
term. It seems to see very fine differences in tone, which is what
minor skin blemishes are.
Interestingly, on the istD, the 77 is just fine as a portait lens. I
suspect that the
9 matches
Mail list logo
