Extra cookies for that man.
S
David Mann wrote:
On Mar 9, 2004, at 10:01, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Can anyone provide approximate dimensions for the various
6x7 Pentax models, also, approx weight with 90mm and 65mm
lenses (or similar close focal lengths)?
I have an Excel spreadsheet somewhere
On 8/3/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Can anyone provide approximate dimensions for the various
6x7 Pentax models, also, approx weight with 90mm and 65mm
lenses (or similar close focal lengths)?
Shel,
362 X 184 X 812 feet
weight with 65mm : 1250 metric tons
weight with 90mm : (scales
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Pentax 67 questions?
Can anyone provide approximate dimensions for the various
6x7 Pentax models, also, approx weight with 90mm and 65mm
lenses (or similar close focal lengths)?
If all you need is approximate, then the Pentax web
On Mar 9, 2004, at 10:01, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Can anyone provide approximate dimensions for the various
6x7 Pentax models, also, approx weight with 90mm and 65mm
lenses (or similar close focal lengths)?
I have an Excel spreadsheet somewhere with this kind of info. I was
gathering information
Wow! That's perfect. Just what i was looking for. Thanks
so much!
shel ;-)))
David Mann wrote:
On Mar 9, 2004, at 10:01, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Can anyone provide approximate dimensions for the various
6x7 Pentax models, also, approx weight with 90mm and 65mm
lenses (or similar
Hello,
i'm a little late on this,
but you can find some info about 6X7 projectors at:
http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/bronslideproj.html
and
http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/proj_667.htm
I bought an used Liesegang Diafant 6x7 on ebay two weeks
ago (370 Euro) and i'm very satisfied with it,
To all of you committed 67 users:
- Is there any 'affordable'system for projecting 67 slides? I remember several years
ago that someone on this list (at that time) had picked up an old maybe large-format
projector that they then modified to take mounted 67 slides. I recall them saying that
To my knowledge, the only 6X7 projector is from Mamiya.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: P Temmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Is there any 'affordable'system for projecting 67 slides? I remember
several years ago that someone on this list (at that time) had picked up an
- Original Message -
From: Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To my knowledge, the only 6X7 projector is from Mamiya.
There is a manual one made by a company called Albin, but I don't know
anything about it except that you have to swap the slides manually. I think
it's in the cheaper range
I like all of the films that I've used in 35mm. However, since grain
isn't a problem, I use a lot more Portra 400 VC in the 6x7. I also use a
lot of Delta 3200. Again, grain is not a huge concern. Other favorites
include Plux-X, T-Max 400, and Ektachrome 100 -- in both VS and S
stocks. I never
Aaron,
Good info. I'll have to run down to the camera store and see how
things look. I have an Lowepro Omni-something or other - looks more
like a briefcase than a traditional bag, but it is too low to fit the
67 with Prism in it. I think they have a pretty extensive Lowepro
line there so
.
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 1:48 AM
Subject: 67 Questions
Hey all you 67 users,
Do you have any tips or guides to go by when handholding this thing?
Is the 1/focal length rule still good
On Sunday, February 10, 2002, at 01:48 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hey all you 67 users,
Do you have any tips or guides to go by when handholding this thing?
Is the 1/focal length rule still good to follow?
Hey, Bruce...does this mean you GOT one? :)
I hold my 67 the same way I hold my 35mm
I've been using Fuji NPH 400 and been well pleased. Grain's not visible in an 8x10,
even with a loupe, and the speed is useful for handheld shooting and/or low light.
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Aaron,
Of course I got one. In a previous post I mentioned the new P67II, AE
II Finder, 90 2.8 and hotshoe grip. Boy am I excited! Thanks for the
tips on the film.
Are there any differences between 120 220 other than # of frames.
Such as wear tear, light leakage, etc. I thought I would
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re[2]: 67 Questions
Are there any differences between 120 220 other than # of
frames.
Such as wear tear, light leakage, etc. I thought I would
stick with
120 unless I have a definate need for more frames on the roll.
No.
William
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Do you have any tips or guides to go by when handholding this thing?
Is the 1/focal length rule still good to follow?
The only lens I've got is the 45mm. I try to keep to 1/250th but have
used it at 1/125 without problems. I might try 1/60 at some stage just to
see how
On Sunday, December 23, 2001, at 04:52 PM, David A. Mann wrote:
I haven't used the 6x7 with a bag, but when I do I think I'll put it
in sideways
instead of vertically, provided my bag is deep enough. That way the MLU
switch can't be accidentally activated.\
I did that in the bag I had
On Sunday, December 23, 2001, at 03:14 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
1. What battery(s) does it take and how long
do they last ( without using metered prism )?
I use my 67 heavily and have change my batteries twice since spring 1998
(when I bought the camera). The first time was within the
Well, at least be selective about your next PUG submission. :)
Collin
On a related note, I sat on my 77mm... snip
tv
- -
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Yes, I have questions about my new camera already.
When using MLU is there a way to release the mirror back down without
actually taking a picture?
What is the little inset black button located on the front of the camera below
the shutter release (is it the answer to the last question)?
David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When using MLU is there a way to release the mirror back down
without
actually taking a picture?
Hi David,
I'm pretty sure it is not possible. You have to take the
picture.
Be careful, the MLU of th 67 is an electrical device, it's not
good to leave the
Aaron Reynolds writes:
Does the 45mm not offer half-stop positions? Eek! The 105mm does.
Anyone know about the 55mm?
The 45mm does. I should have been more clear about my desire for half-stop
shutter speeds: they allow you to set the exact aperture you want (for whatever
DOF effect
A scroll of mail from Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 30 Aug
2001 21:43:26 -0400
Read it? y
hmmm. Isn't 90mm more of a normal lens on a 6x7? It is about equivalent to a 45mm in
the 35mm world, innit?
The 6x7 comes with a 105/f2.4 as standard and that seems to be about a
50mm equiv. It's
A scroll of mail from David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat,
1 Sep 2001 15:28:10 +1200
Read it? y
Not a steal, they know what gear is worth :) If it's still there tomorrow I'll ask
them what its worth without the lens. I know its a little pointless having a body
with no lenses but at least
dave o'brien wrote:
The 6x7 comes with a 105/f2.4 as standard and that seems to be about a
50mm equiv. It's also just about the fastest MF lens available.
The 90mm has a slightly closer minimum focus distance, from what I
recall when I was deciding which to buy with my 67. Our Pentax rep
I think it was intended for weddings and things like that.
--graywolf
David A. Mann wrote:
Doug Brewer writes:
hmmm. Isn't 90mm more of a normal lens on a 6x7? It is about equivalent to a
45mm in the 35mm world, innit?
Yes. It's a focal length I'm really fond of (my RB67 came with
Well I'm now the proud owner of one second-hand Pentax digital spot meter.
Quite a nice little piece of equipment :)
The shop I got it from had a very nice Pentax 67 (latest model before the 67II)
recently arrive on the shelf. If it were a little (actually a lot) cheaper I would
have
David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I'm intending to buy a 67 at some stage (I've decided
that I don't need
the extra features of the 67II): how do you activate the
mirror lockup? I don't
know how to cock the shutter without film in the camera so I
couldn't try the
mystery
- snip -
One thing I found strange: the newer body had a 90mm f/2.8 leaf shutter lens
on it. Seems strange to put only 5 aperture blades into what's essentially an
outdoor portrait lens.
- snip -
How much do they want for the lens only? and is it in
decent condition? I just picked up
From: David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The shop I got it from had a very nice Pentax 67 (latest model before the
67II)
recently arrive on the shelf. If it were a little (actually a lot)
cheaper I would
have bought it as its in really good condition. They had an older, more
used
body
Doug Brewer writes:
hmmm. Isn't 90mm more of a normal lens on a 6x7? It is about equivalent to a
45mm in the 35mm world, innit?
Yes. It's a focal length I'm really fond of (my RB67 came with a 90mm f/3.8).
I assumed the Pentax to be an outdoors portrait lens because they put a leaf
32 matches
Mail list logo
