Re: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-17 Thread Lon Williamson
I have Picture Window Pro, and have run it a few times. I think had I stumbled onto it before photoshop, I'd be using it happily. But I'm so USED to layers, and PWP ain't got 'em. And right now I don't want to learn another editing program well. Norman Koren (spelling on last name?) has a web s

Re: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-14 Thread E.R.N. Reed
Mark Stringer wrote: ACDSee Pro - Any comments for Pentax DSLR usage? I have ACDSee 7, hard drive failed and have used my limit on licenses. I'm sure they would give me another but I haven't tried. I'm still looking for the "all in one" like Adobe Lightroom "enhanced" with more Photoshop f

Re: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-14 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Photoshop Elements v3 and up handles [EMAIL PROTECTED] for *some* operations, not as many as Photoshop CS or CS2. Godfrey On Mar 14, 2006, at 3:07 PM, David Weiss wrote: Shel, Is the color depth 8 or 16 bit for Elements? Do you know the color depth of the others mentioned in this thread?

Re: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-14 Thread Shel Belinkoff
The new Elements surly processes 16-bits. It would have to if it can handle RAW files, no? >From the PWP site: Picture Window Pro is an extremely powerful image editor that has every feature serious photographers require. Among them, Full support for ICC color management. Full support for 4

Re: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-14 Thread David Weiss
Shel, Is the color depth 8 or 16 bit for Elements? Do you know the color depth of the others mentioned in this thread? Dave Previous Post: The only reason I mentioned Elements is that it offers RAW processing, is inexpensive (which seemed to be a "feature" you wanted), and has some features

Re: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-14 Thread Shel Belinkoff
The only reason I mentioned Elements is that it offers RAW processing, is inexpensive (which seemed to be a "feature" you wanted), and has some features that are well ahead of PS 7.0, and led even later releases of PS. Since a DL and tryout is free, what's to lose except DL time ... In a differen

Re: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-14 Thread Mark Stringer
006 11:54 AM Subject: Re: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it? Mark Stringer wrote: ACDSee Pro - Any comments for Pentax DSLR usage? I have ACDSee 7, hard drive failed and have used my limit on licenses. I'm sure they would give me another but I haven't tried. I'm still looking for the &qu

Re: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-14 Thread Adam Maas
Mark Stringer wrote: ACDSee Pro - Any comments for Pentax DSLR usage? I have ACDSee 7, hard drive failed and have used my limit on licenses. I'm sure they would give me another but I haven't tried. I'm still looking for the "all in one" like Adobe Lightroom "enhanced" with more Photoshop fe

RE: ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-14 Thread Shel Belinkoff
What about the new version of Adobe Photoshop Elements? Shel > [Original Message] > From: Mark Stringer > ACDSee Pro - Any comments for Pentax DSLR usage? > > I have ACDSee 7, hard drive failed and have used my limit on licenses. I'm > sure they would give me another but I haven't tried.

ACDSee Pro - anyone using it?

2006-03-14 Thread Mark Stringer
ACDSee Pro - Any comments for Pentax DSLR usage? I have ACDSee 7, hard drive failed and have used my limit on licenses. I'm sure they would give me another but I haven't tried. I'm still looking for the "all in one" like Adobe Lightroom "enhanced" with more Photoshop features. CS freaks me