Hey Bill, when are you going to get a K10D? Are you waiting until all
the bugs are worked out?
:)
Stan
On Nov 26, 2006, at 11:54 AM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob Shell"
> Subject: Re: AW: AW: Pentax 1.8 85mm
>
>
>>
>
On Nov 26, 2006, at 9:26 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
>> This is only a guess, since
>> I DON'T GET MY K10 FOR ALMOST A WEEK,
>> so I can't test this at the moment
>
> I'm not sure when mine will ship ... Adorama is still saying
> "Processing" and their K10D page still says expected to ship beginning
On 26/11/06, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using the Canon IS system all the time shortens battery life. Thus
> the switch, so you can turn it off when you don't need it. I would
> imagine in-body systems will also shorten battery life, but probably
> not as much.
In the case of the Pe
William Robb wrote:
> I suspect that with SR on, when doing a pan, the sensor will pin itself
> against one of the horizontal stops and continue to give vertical SR.
I'm hoping it works out something like that.
> This is only a guess, since
> I DON'T GET MY K10 FOR ALMOST A WEEK,
> so I can't t
Hey, suck it up. It's not in my budget for several months.
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob Shell"
> Subject: Re: AW: AW: Pentax 1.8 85mm
>
>
>
>> On Nov 26, 2006, at 11:27 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>>
>>
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell"
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Pentax 1.8 85mm
>
> On Nov 26, 2006, at 11:27 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
>> Can you turn the Pentax SR on and off on each axis
>> separately or is it xy both on / xy both off.?
>> I
On Nov 26, 2006, at 11:27 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Can you turn the Pentax SR on and off on each axis
> separately or is it xy both on / xy both off.?
> It would be better if you could choose only the axes
> you wanted SR on...
It's all or nothing, as I understand.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Disc
, November 26, 2006 10:09 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Pentax 1.8 85mm
John Whittingham wrote:
> The manual states to switch SR off when using the camera tripod
> mounted, I'll
> be switching it off when panning moving subjects like World Superbike
racers
> e
John Whittingham wrote:
> I think I'll have a look in the manual later.
When all else fails, read the destructions.
:-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The only issue I've run across is that you will have trouble using SR on
a tripod if bracketing for HDR rendering (Registration will be
distinctly off).
-Adam
Markus Maurer wrote:
> This may be a stupid question but does SR/IS have any negative side effects?
> greetings
> Markus
>
> -Ursp
nyone got any clues?
I think I'll have a look in the manual later.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:09:03 -0500
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Pentax 1.8 85mm
> John Whittingham wrote
John Whittingham wrote:
> The manual states to switch SR off when using the camera tripod mounted, I'll
> be switching it off when panning moving subjects like World Superbike racers
> etc.
I'm going to try it both ways when panning, just in case it will help in
the vertical without hurting in
I think I'd much prefer the view with SR. I don't see it as a disadvantage.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bob Shell
> IS in the lens makes some people dizzy when using certain lenses.
>
> SR in the body has the disadvantage that you can't see the effect
> through the viewfinder and jus
On Nov 26, 2006, at 12:24 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
> thanks for your quick and precise answer :-)
> I would have guessed that the auto focusing time could be slightly
> affected/longer with sr on, there must be a reason for the off
> switch. Since
> I still use film, it's all only speculation f
IS in the lens makes some people dizzy when using certain lenses.
SR in the body has the disadvantage that you can't see the effect
through the viewfinder and just have to trust that it is working.
Bob
On Nov 25, 2006, at 10:43 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
> This may be a stupid question but does
orld Superbike racers
etc.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: "Markus Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 06:24:25 +0100
Subject: AW: AW: Pentax 1.8 85mm
> Hi Ken
> thanks for your quick and precise a
liche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von
K.Takeshita
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. November 2006 05:17
An: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Betreff: Re: AW: Pentax 1.8 85mm
On 11/25/06 10:43 PM, "Markus Maurer", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be a stu
Only with film cameras ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Markus Maurer
> This may be a stupid question but does SR/IS have any negative side
effects?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 11/25/06 10:43 PM, "Markus Maurer", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be a stupid question but does SR/IS have any negative side effects?
If properly implemented, there should be no appreciable side effects on
either system (SR or IS).
In theory, whenever any lens group is added, such as i
This may be a stupid question but does SR/IS have any negative side effects?
greetings
Markus
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von
K.Takeshita
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. November 2006 01:11
An: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Betreff: Re: Pentax 1.8 8
Hi Jens
I have the SMC Takumar M42 1.8 85mm lens and it is one of the best primes I
own in that range and the metal construction is just wonderful to handle. I
don't know about the/a K version.
I use the M100mm Pentax prime often because I seldom carry the Spotmatic F
but usually the ME Super or a
21 matches
Mail list logo
