Company from HELL!
Updated: August 15, 2003
- Original Message -
From: Pat White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: Colour fidelity low-light AF of *ist-D
D. Glenn Arthur wrote:
First, Google for anomalous reflectance. I've
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:22:01 +0200, Dr E D F Williams wrote:
More than a year ago (two?) we had a discussion about this very thing -
colour perception. Do we all see the same colours? Two people look at a
coloured object; both agree that it's yellow-green. But do they actually
perceive
It's an interesting thought, but what I perceive to be blue might actually
what you perceive to be green. Imagine people around you who go thru life
seeing 'blue' vegetables (though it seems perfectly normal to them *because*
that's what they always known the label 'green' to refer to). And how
Hi,
Thursday, November 6, 2003, 2:24:49 PM, you wrote:
It's an interesting thought, but what I perceive to be blue might actually
what you perceive to be green. Imagine people around you who go thru life
seeing 'blue' vegetables (though it seems perfectly normal to them *because*
that's what
!
Updated: August 15, 2003
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: Colour fidelity low-light AF of *ist-D
Hi,
Thursday, November 6, 2003, 2:24:49 PM, you wrote:
It's an interesting
This brings up a question I have always wanted to ask -- related to
the fact that my own two eyes see colors slightly differently! It's
easiest to see in skin tones, but if I close one eye and then the
other, it's obvious to me that my right eye sees a slightly warmer
or redder rendition than
Hell, my left eye sees colors differently (more blue) than my right eye, how
could anyone think that two different people would see them the same?
--
Dr E D F Williams wrote:
I think its more likely that different eye/brain sets might see the same
colour very slightly shifted, one way or the
I've never noticed any color difference between my eyes, and in a simple test
now, also don't.
One has a lot of floaters, though. If that helps.
Hehehe.
Marnie aka Doe
No perceptible color changes, but a faint (thin) cataract on the left
cornea acts much like one of my old Takumars... Slightly yellow.
Normally, it's not noticeable. Not with both eyes open.
With just the left eye open, I can't _see_ the color bias, but my vision
is much less sharp. Hardly
chris posted:
On the subject of weird eyes, a friend of mine can tell which eye she is
looking out of. I'm not sure if they're spaced further apart than normal,
or if she just has trouble focusing them properly, but she says that she
sees things from two slightly different perspectives...
It's an interesting thought, but what I perceive to be blue might actually
what you perceive to be green. Imagine people around you who go thru life
seeing 'blue' vegetables (though it seems perfectly normal to them *because*
that's what they always known the label 'green' to refer to). And how
On 6/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Hell, my left eye sees colors differently (more blue) than my right eye, how
could anyone think that two different people would see them the same?
Hey Tom, if you went to one of those retro 3-D movies of the Blob or
whatever, you wouldn't need the
On 6/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I've never noticed any color difference between my eyes, and in a simple
test
now, also don't.
One has a lot of floaters, though. If that helps.
ROTFL. Marnie, you kill me.
Sorry folks.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
I remember noticing this maybe 15 years ago. I just thought that I was
getting old, or that one eye was irritated. Apparently everyone has a
dominant eye, mine is my left eye, and it appears cooler than my right
eye, which does seem to have a noticeable warmer tint to it.
rg
graywolf wrote:
It's an interesting thought, but what I perceive to be blue might
actually [be] what you perceive to be green. (...) And how would one
actually prove any of this?
Ryan
I don't think it's empirically testable. If two people attach the same
label to the same experience then that is all we can
Hi,
Thursday, November 6, 2003, 9:42:35 PM, you wrote:
I don't think it's empirically testable. If two people attach the same
label to the same experience then that is all we can know, or need to
know. (...)
Bob
Among some amazonian groups, there is a single word for both green or
blue, But
]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Colour fidelity low-light AF of *ist-D
It might be a function of depth perception, like 3D glasses. My right eye
seems
to be color dominant. If I look at something and cover my left eye the
color
does not change. If I cover my right eye
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chris posted:
On the subject of weird eyes, a friend of mine can tell which eye she is
looking out of. I'm not sure if they're spaced further apart than normal,
or if she just has trouble focusing them properly, but she says that she
sees
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Andre Langevin wrote:
Among some amazonian groups, there is a single word for both green or
blue, But if you show people both green and blue colors and ask if these
are different, they will say they are. They just don't find it usefull
for their purposes to distinguish
D. Glenn Arthur wrote:
First, Google for anomalous reflectance. I've read about
the effect on film before, and apparently there are certain
fabric/dye combinations that are a real PITA for catalog
photography because of it. (Or maybe you don't have to, since
you already have a handle on the
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 3 Nov 2003 at 22:35, John Francis wrote:
Oops. Make that IR and near-IR, not UV.
There is increased sensitivity into the UV, too, but that causes
things to look more blue, not more red. Proof-read more carefully!
If the *ist D is like most
John Francis wrote:
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12345678
(I used to use that trick a lot.)
One one costume, though, I noticed an extreme colour shift. It
was made of blue velvet material (about the colour of Sexy Kitty
for those who watched the
I've seen this sort of thing once before - slide shots of some
flowers in New Zealand exhibited a very similar alteration.
The cause is that film (and, I assume, the CCD sensor) is more
senstive to the low-UV than the human eye. Objects with a high
component of UV in their appearance can
On 3 Nov 2003 at 22:35, John Francis wrote:
Oops. Make that IR and near-IR, not UV.
There is increased sensitivity into the UV, too, but that causes
things to look more blue, not more red. Proof-read more carefully!
If the *ist D is like most other cameras it will have a hot mirror (IR
24 matches
Mail list logo
