Re: D - Not Pentax but an interesting digital save...

2004-02-02 Thread Robert Gonzalez
The results look great. I cant help but feel that this picture has a 50's look to it. I wonder what it would look like if you modernized it a bit, perhaps by bringing back the rose in color? rg Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: Ok, so you all know that I'm not shooting digital with Pentax, but

D - Not Pentax but an interesting digital save...

2004-01-30 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
Ok, so you all know that I'm not shooting digital with Pentax, but this is particularly relevant to all digital users. Just wanted to show you something that I have just worked on from the wedding I did on Monday. This was a GROSSLY underexposed image. Definitely one for the reject pile, but

RE: D - Not Pentax but an interesting digital save...

2004-01-30 Thread Jeff Jonsson
Works for me. Jeff. -Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 2:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: D - Not Pentax but an interesting digital save... Ok, so you all know that I'm not shooting digital with Pentax

Re: D - Not Pentax but an interesting digital save...

2004-01-30 Thread Bill Owens
Subject: D - Not Pentax but an interesting digital save... Ok, so you all know that I'm not shooting digital with Pentax, but this is particularly relevant to all digital users. Just wanted to show you something that I have just worked on from the wedding I did on Monday