Re: PPG question about declined submissions

What Brian said...and you might want to change something like the category. Bong On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Brian Walters wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011, at 05:10 PM, David Parsons wrote: >> When you submit to the PPG and a picture is declined, can you resubmit >> it, or wil

Re: PPG question about declined submissions

Awesome. On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Brian Walters wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011, at 05:10 PM, David Parsons wrote: >> When you submit to the PPG and a picture is declined, can you resubmit >> it, or will they penalize you if you do? > > > Resubmit away.  I'

Re: PPG question about declined submissions

d a picture is declined, can you resubmit >> it, or will they penalize you if you do? > > > Resubmit away.  I've had  several approved that were previously > declined. > > > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++ > Brian Walters

Re: PPG question about declined submissions

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011, at 05:10 PM, David Parsons wrote: > When you submit to the PPG and a picture is declined, can you resubmit > it, or will they penalize you if you do? Resubmit away. I've had several approved that were previously declined. Ch

PPG question about declined submissions

When you submit to the PPG and a picture is declined, can you resubmit it, or will they penalize you if you do? -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http

Re: Accepted and Declined

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:16:50 +1000, "Peter McIntosh" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I like the whole album, but I'm a sucker for a good train photo, .. > > > > Yeah, me too. Pity the Pentax Gallery didn't think

Re: Accepted and Declined

Yes - but the 1/3 acceptance rate is badly skewed by the early acceptance rate. It's more like 1/12 now and dropping fast :-(> Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney, Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:53:12

RE: Accepted and Declined

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:16:50 +1000, "Peter McIntosh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I like the whole album, but I'm a sucker for a good train photo, .. Yeah, me too. Pity the Pentax Gallery didn't think the same way :-(> Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters

RE: Accepted and Declined

List Subject: Re: Accepted and Declined You did a a great job on the scan. 10Points Dave On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Dave > > The steam engine shots were actually taken many years ago and scanned > from 6 x 4 prints. I

Re: Accepted and Declined

of work IMO. > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f > > - Original Message - > From: "Brian Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: GESO: Accepted and Declined > > > > Hi all > > > > Just for fun I thought I'd put togethe

Re: Accepted and Declined

quot; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > You just want us to look at a lot of pictures. > > > > :-) > > > > You have a great gallery there Brian. Specially like the steam engine > > shots > > > > Dave > > > > > &g

Re: Accepted and Declined

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Brian: and that was fun to look at. Lots to like in the declined. That > steam engine is very nice. I especially like the wall art & lifeguard > shots. Overall, you have a nice eye for color and interesting subjects. > And the acc

Re: Accepted and Declined

Thanks Peter That one was taken late in the afternoon. The combination of low sun and sandstone walls always produces great colour. I'll have to go back and take some more shots of that church. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney, Australia http://mem

Re: Accepted and Declined

nal Message - > > From: "Brian Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: GESO: Accepted and Declined > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > Just for fun I thought I'd put together a gallery of images that have >

Re: Accepted and Declined

Brian My favourite reject is the church http://supera.myjalbum.net/Pentax_Photo_Gallery_Submissions/Declined_Images/slides/IMGP2987pg.html Not too fussy for me anyway and fantastic lighting Thanks Peter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml

Re: Accepted and Declined

- Original Message - From: "Brian Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Just for fun I thought I'd put together a gallery of images that have > been accepted and declined in the Pentax Photo Gallery. If anyone's > interested Brian: and that was fun to loo

Re: Accepted and Declined

You just want us to look at a lot of pictures. :-) You have a great gallery there Brian. Specially like the steam engine shots Dave > - Original Message - > From: "Brian Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: GESO: Accepted and Declined > > >

Re: Accepted and Declined

Hi Ken Thanks for that observation. I hadn't noticed that but I think you're right. I'll definitely consider that in selecting future submissions. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney, Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ On Tue, 8 Ap

Re: GESO: Accepted and Declined

Thanks Ann There's certainly no planning in what I submit, so overload on certain topics is probably unavoidable. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney, Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:35:31 -0400, "ann sanfe

Re: Accepted and Declined

The accepted images are a really nice body of work IMO. Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "Brian Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: GESO: Accepted and Declined > Hi all > > Just for fun I thought I'd put together a

Re: GESO: Accepted and Declined

f images that have >been accepted and declined in the Pentax Photo Gallery. If anyone's >interested it's here: > >http://supera.myjalbum.net/Pentax_Photo_Gallery_Submissions/Declined_Images/index.html > >The Gallery uses JAlbum and the Chameleon template (this is the same

GESO: Accepted and Declined

Hi all Just for fun I thought I'd put together a gallery of images that have been accepted and declined in the Pentax Photo Gallery. If anyone's interested it's here: http://supera.myjalbum.net/Pentax_Photo_Gallery_Submissions/Declined_Images/index.html The Gallery uses

Pentax Gallery: was declined now accepted...

Here's an interesting development with the Pentax Gallery. I posted a friends' portrait and soon after it was declined. After a while, looking through some of the different categories, I decided to resubmit *her* photo under a different category. Originally submitted it under "

Re: Declined...

Hmmm. Should be way over 24 hours already ... give or take half a day depending on time zones... Bong On 3/11/07, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pretty quicly ... 24hours max AFAIR. > > 2007/3/11, Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 3/5/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Declined...

Pretty quicly ... 24hours max AFAIR. 2007/3/11, Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 3/5/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dave, if you haven't gotten a code yet, check your junk email folder. > > If it's not there, send them another request. > > > > Doug Brewer > > http://www.d

Re: Declined...

On 3/5/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dave, if you haven't gotten a code yet, check your junk email folder. > If it's not there, send them another request. > > Doug Brewer > http://www.drivingtheflies.com > How long before they respond with the code? I just remembered I requested f

Re: Declined...

Good Luck uploading. Jack --- David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It took 24 hours to get mine > > Dave > > On 3/8/07, Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How long does it take to get the code? > > > > On Monday 05 March 2007 19:17, David J Brooks wrote: > > > Got my code to d

Re: Declined...

It took 24 hours to get mine Dave On 3/8/07, Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How long does it take to get the code? > > On Monday 05 March 2007 19:17, David J Brooks wrote: > > Got my code to day. > > > > I have 4-5 from GFM, that i'll submit. > > > > We'll see. > > > > Dave > > > > O

Re: Declined...

How long does it take to get the code? On Monday 05 March 2007 19:17, David J Brooks wrote: > Got my code to day. > > I have 4-5 from GFM, that i'll submit. > > We'll see. > > Dave > > On 3/4/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Doug,

Re: Declined...

al can definitely overcome some of those deficiencies. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Declined... > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Roberts" > Subject: Re: Declined... > >

Re: Declined...

In a message dated 3/7/2007 4:47:54 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul Stenquist wrote: >Based on observation, I'd say "Ready for Review" means they haven't >looked at it yet. "On hold" means they looked at it and they're not >sure they want it, but they're going to

Re: Declined...

Paul Stenquist wrote: >Based on observation, I'd say "Ready for Review" means they haven't >looked at it yet. "On hold" means they looked at it and they're not >sure they want it, but they're going to hold off on declining it until >they see if they get better material. Based on observation I'

Declined...

Mark Roberts wrote: "And though one of my rejected photos was taken with the Pentax (Tamron) 28-200, the other two were shot with the SMC-F 100/2.8 Macro." Is that lens listed in the pull down menu? Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdm

Re: Declined...

On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Doug Brewer wrote: > >> Walter Hamler wrote: >>> Well, at least they are doing something with the gallery. I had > submitted 11 >>> photos that were all tenatively accepted. This AM they show 6 in the >>> Galle

Re: Declined...

Doug Brewer wrote: >Walter Hamler wrote: >> Well, at least they are doing something with the gallery. I had submitted 11 >> photos that were all tenatively accepted. This AM they show 6 in the >> Gallery, 1 in the Collection, 3 on hold, and 1 Declined. >> The declin

Re: Declined...

He can, and he'd tell you himself it he wasn't busy polishing his own ego. Tom C wrote: >>> Define 'technical flaws'. :-) >>> >> http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?include=all&user_id=992048 >> >> HAR!!! >> >> William Robb >> >> > > > Good one. That fellow is in serious need of so

Re: Declined...

; - Original Message - > From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Declined... > > > >>>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Date: 2007/03/05 Mon PM 01:47:29 GMT >>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List &

Re: Declined...

> > > > Define 'technical flaws'. :-) > >http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?include=all&user_id=992048 > >HAR!!! > >William Robb > Good one. That fellow is in serious need of some guidance! Maybe Ken Roockwell could help him. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http:

Re: Declined...

- Original Message - From: "Tom C" Subject: Re: Declined... >> > > Define 'technical flaws'. :-) http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?include=all&user_id=992048 HAR!!! William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Declined...

> >Sometimes massive oversimplifications hit the nail on the head. >I carp quite often that this picture or that is worthy of a Wisner. By >this, >I mean that the picture is deserving of the increase in technical quality >that more detail will provide. > >What I don't believe is that tired old saw

Re: Declined...

- Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" Subject: Re: Declined... > Kenneth Waller wrote: > >>>As you say, digital images work best when they are lacking in detail > and >>>graphical in nature. >> >>Sort of style vs substance? &

Re: Declined...

Kenneth Waller wrote: >>As you say, digital images work best when they are lacking in detail and >>graphical in nature. > >Sort of style vs substance? By the way, I don't believe the statement that "igital images work best when they are lacking in detail and graphical in nature." That's a mas

Re: Declined...

On 3/7/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Walter Hamler wrote: > > Well, at least they are doing something with the gallery. I had submitted 11 > > photos that were all tenatively accepted. This AM they show 6 in the > > Gallery, 1 in the Collection, 3 on ho

Re: Declined...

>As you say, digital images work best when they are lacking in detail and >graphical in nature. Sort of style vs substance? Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Declined... > >> >> From: Mar

Re: Declined...

Pentax is putting together a gallery of images by Pentax users. I don't have the URL handy, you can search the archives but I bet someone will post it for you any minute now. Shel Belinkoff wrote: > What's this "Pentax Gallery?" > > Shel > > > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five y

Re: Declined...

What's this "Pentax Gallery?" Shel -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Declined...

Walter Hamler wrote: > Well, at least they are doing something with the gallery. I had submitted 11 > photos that were all tenatively accepted. This AM they show 6 in the > Gallery, 1 in the Collection, 3 on hold, and 1 Declined. > The declined shot was shot with a 135 SMC-M lens

Declined...

Well, at least they are doing something with the gallery. I had submitted 11 photos that were all tenatively accepted. This AM they show 6 in the Gallery, 1 in the Collection, 3 on hold, and 1 Declined. The declined shot was shot with a 135 SMC-M lens but they did not have a 135 in the

Re: Declined...

In a message dated 3/5/2007 8:14:56 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I have come to feel more and more, personally about my own >pics, that if it doesn't work as a good thumbnail then it doesn't work >a lot better larger. Or maybe I am just

Re: Declined...

Got my code to day. I have 4-5 from GFM, that i'll submit. We'll see. Dave On 3/4/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Doug, what are the image size specs? Does any specific information > > need > > to accompany the images? To what

Re: Declined...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I have come to feel more and more, personally about my own >pics, that if it doesn't work as a good thumbnail then it doesn't work >a lot better larger. Or maybe I am just leaning more toward strong >graphic elements. Probably just a matter of what you're shooting

Re: Declined...

> > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/03/05 Mon PM 03:02:38 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Declined... > > mike wilson wrote: > > >"Funding led" means 'rearranging' your principles to attract the

Re: Declined...

> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 2007/03/05 Mon PM 03:06:41 GMT > To: pdml@pdml.net > Subject: Re: Declined... > > In a message dated 3/5/2007 7:03:45 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > But there are some images which have a strong graph

Re: Declined...

In a message dated 3/5/2007 7:03:45 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But there are some images which have a strong graphical design elements and which also contain a lot of detail. In other words, they stand up well as thumbnails and in larger display formats. When displ

Re: Declined...

mike wilson wrote: >"Funding led" means 'rearranging' your principles to attract the highest amount of funding. As you say, digital images work best when they are lacking in detail and graphical in nature. If your previous images were more inclined to hold a lot of detail and subtle nuance,

Re: Declined...

> > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/03/05 Mon PM 01:47:29 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Declined... > > mike wilson wrote: > > >> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> Paul St

Re: Declined...

mike wilson wrote: >> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> >46! I have to get busy. >> >> I think I've submitted about 22 so far. I'm trying to be selective, >> though; I'm only going with images that I think are very strong >> graphically, so they stand ou

Re: Declined...

Clear! Thanks. Jack --- Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Doug, what are the image size specs? Does any specific information > > > need > > to accompany the images? To what email address are they sent? > > Thanks! > > > > Jack >

Re: Declined...

Guess I could have figured that out. Thanks! Jack --- David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, drop the second t from the link: > > > > Cheers, > > Dave > > On 3/5/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David, I get; "this website cann

Re: Declined...

That's about where I'm at, twenty-something. On Mar 4, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> 46! I have to get busy. > > I think I've submitted about 22 so far. I'm trying to be selective, > though; I'm only going with images that I think are very strong > graphically

Re: Declined...

> > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/03/05 Mon AM 03:38:21 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Declined... > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > >46! I have to get busy. > > I think I've submitted about 22 so far. I'

Re: Declined...

Sorry, drop the second t from the link: Cheers, Dave On 3/5/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David, I get; "this website cannot be found" when I click on the second > html".(?) > Thanks for help. > > Jack > --- David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Declined...

On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:34 PM, David Savage wrote: > It's not on the Pentax website. > > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home > > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artistt > > Cheers, > > Dave The second link has one too many t's at the end. Doug Brewer http://www.drivingtheflies.com -- PDM

Re: Declined...

On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > Doug, what are the image size specs? Does any specific information > need > to accompany the images? To what email address are they sent? > Thanks! > > Jack The images are not sent to an email address. You ask for an invitation, using the addr

Re: Declined...

David, I get; "this website cannot be found" when I click on the second html".(?) Thanks for help. Jack --- David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not on the Pentax website. > > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home > > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artistt > > Cheers, > > Dave >

Re: Declined...

Doug, I can't make any sense of this site?? Jack --- Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Paul, > > > > In a post today, I believe it was you who mentioned a "drop down > menu" > > detailing submission particulars.(?) I've emailed Pentax

Re: Declined...

Doug, what are the image size specs? Does any specific information need to accompany the images? To what email address are they sent? Thanks! Jack --- Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Paul, > > > > In a post today, I believe it was y

Re: Declined...

Paul Stenquist wrote: >46! I have to get busy. I think I've submitted about 22 so far. I'm trying to be selective, though; I'm only going with images that I think are very strong graphically, so they stand out as thumbnails as well as being good photographs when seen in detail. We'll see how

Re: Declined...

On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > Paul, > > In a post today, I believe it was you who mentioned a "drop down menu" > detailing submission particulars.(?) I've emailed Pentax for such, but > it may be that I'm overlooking something on their site? > > Jack When you upload a photo, yo

Re: Declined...

d showing. Congratulations. >> Paul >> On Mar 4, 2007, at 6:50 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote: >> >>> I've submitted a total of 46 to date. >>> 31 have been accepted to the gallery. >>> 5 have been accepted into the collection. >>> 2 ready for re

Re: Declined...

It's not on the Pentax website. http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artistt Cheers, Dave On 3/5/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul, > > In a post today, I believe it was you who mentioned a "drop down menu" > detailing submission particulars.(

Re: Declined...

> 2 ready for review. > > 1 on hold. (not sure what that means) > > 7 declined. (no reason given) > > > > Too labor/time intensive for me to post the declined shots by the > > means that > > I have just now. > > > > Kenneth Waller > > > > --

Re: Declined...

n or Nikon publish shots taken with compactors gear? > > Kenneth Waller > > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Declined... > > > >> One difficulty in submitting is that both camera and lens must be

Re: Declined...

;> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Subject: Re: Declined... >> >> >>> One difficulty in submitting is that both camera and lens must be >>> Pentax. That lets out many of my

Re: Declined...

1 on hold. (not sure what that means) > 7 declined. (no reason given) > > Too labor/time intensive for me to post the declined shots by the > means that > I have just now. > > Kenneth Waller > > - Original Message - > From: "Doug Brewer" <[EMAIL PR

Re: Declined...

The 300mm f4.5 FA is also missing. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Declined... > SMC Pentax (k series) lenses aren't listed either, but I've submitted > shots taken with them. I'm sure

Re: Declined...

t; > Does Canon or Nikon publish shots taken with compactors gear? > > Kenneth Waller > > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Declined... > > > > One difficulty in submitting is that both

Re: Declined...

> But it makes sense that they don't want to show what competitors > lenses are capable of. That can be taken several ways. Does Canon or Nikon publish shots taken with compactors gear? Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Declined...

I've submitted a total of 46 to date. 31 have been accepted to the gallery. 5 have been accepted into the collection. 2 ready for review. 1 on hold. (not sure what that means) 7 declined. (no reason given) Too labor/time intensive for me to post the declined shots by the means that I have

Re: Declined...

L PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Paul Stenquist > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 9:04 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Declined... > > > I have no declines, some on hold, a few in collection and a handful in > gallery. > On Mar 4, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Bruce Dayton

Re: Declined...

SMC Pentax (k series) lenses aren't listed either, but I've submitted shots taken with them. I'm sure that any Pentax gear is fine. Paul On Mar 4, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Bruce Dayton wrote: > >> One difficulty in submitting is that both camera and lens must be >> Pentax. > > One

Re: Declined...

In a message dated 3/4/2007 9:56:09 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.alphoto.com/leadville.htm Doug Brewer = Well, personally, I don't know why they declined it. Marnie aka Doe :-) ** AOL now offers free

RE: Declined...

Congratulations Paul. Are thes photos we have seen here? Cars? greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Stenquist Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 9:04 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Declined... I have no declines

Re: Declined...

Bruce Dayton wrote: >One difficulty in submitting is that both camera and lens must be >Pentax. One difficulty for me is that the Pentax MX isn't allowed! OK, it's certainly allowed. They just neglected to put in into their drop-down list for camera selection. I sent them an email about it a w

Re: Declined...

est regards, >> Bruce >> >> >> Sunday, March 4, 2007, 9:54:30 AM, you wrote: >> >> DB> Just for fun, let's see what you submitted to the Pentax Gallery >> and >> DB> had declined. >> >> DB> I&#

Re: Declined...

day, March 4, 2007, 9:54:30 AM, you wrote: > > DB> Just for fun, let's see what you submitted to the Pentax Gallery > and > DB> had declined. > > DB> I'll start: > > DB> http://www.alphoto.com/leadville.htm > > > DB> Doug Brewer > DB>

Re: Declined...

On Mar 4, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > Doug, may I ask what email address you used? I tried to adapt their > "care and support" form. > Thanks! > > Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug Brewer http://www.drivingtheflies.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mail

Re: Declined...

I have no declines, but a bunch on hold. I figured they must have gone to sleep or something. -- Best regards, Bruce Sunday, March 4, 2007, 9:54:30 AM, you wrote: DB> Just for fun, let's see what you submitted to the Pentax Gallery and DB> had declined. DB> I'

Re: Declined...

obertstech.com/temp/temp.htm > > (That's Independence Pass) > > > > Did they give a *reason* for rejection? Their FAQ says "PENTAX will > > provide an explanation in the notes section for each declined > photo" > > but there was no such explanatio

Re: Declined...

On Mar 4, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > > Maybe they hate Colorado? > http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm > (That's Independence Pass) > > Did they give a *reason* for rejection? Their FAQ says "PENTAX will > provide an explanation in the notes

Re: Declined...

t; > On 3/4/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Doug Brewer wrote: > > > > >Just for fun, let's see what you submitted to the Pentax Gallery > > >and had declined. > > > > > >I'll start: > > > > > >

Re: Declined...

I'm waiting for my code still. I have two i'd like to send. We'll see. Dave On 3/4/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doug Brewer wrote: > > >Just for fun, let's see what you submitted to the Pentax Gallery > >and had declined. >

Re: Declined...

Doug Brewer wrote: >Just for fun, let's see what you submitted to the Pentax Gallery >and had declined. > >I'll start: > >http://www.alphoto.com/leadville.htm Maybe they hate Colorado? http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm (That's Independence Pass) Did t

RE: Declined...

Pity. Nice light, nice composition, nice sky, but not enough mountain and not enough C. -- Bob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Doug Brewer > Sent: 04 March 2007 17:55 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >

Declined...

Just for fun, let's see what you submitted to the Pentax Gallery and had declined. I'll start: http://www.alphoto.com/leadville.htm Doug Brewer http://www.drivingtheflies.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Grandfather Mountain Order Declined

back in the saddle. >Paul -- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Four days after placing my order for GFM and getting an invoice copy reply, I > received an e-mail saying my order was declined. No reason was given. I guess > that means I'm out. The

Re: Grandfather Mountain Order Declined

On 2/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: . But the issue has been resolved. I'm back in the saddle. Yay! -frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Re: Grandfather Mountain Order Declined

ED] > Four days after placing my order for GFM and getting an invoice copy reply, I > received an e-mail saying my order was declined. No reason was given. I guess > that means I'm out. The text of the message was as follows: > > You have received this notification from Grandf

Re: Grandfather Mountain Order Declined

On 6/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed: >Dear Paul Stenquist, > >We are sorry to inform you that your order was declined. They won't take just anybody you know ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Grandfather Mountain Order Declined

Four days after placing my order for GFM and getting an invoice copy reply, I received an e-mail saying my order was declined. No reason was given. I guess that means I'm out. The text of the message was as follows: You have received this notification from Grandfather Mountain because you

  1   2   >