Re: Eclipse photo rework

It should be the very same url On September 2, 2018 3:50:19 PM PDT, Steve Cottrell wrote: >On 2/9/18, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: > Thanks for the kind words, and especially the feedback. I, too, had >>been disappointed at the loss of prominence of the CMEs. I went in >and

Re: Eclipse photo rework

On 2/9/18, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: >>> Thanks for the kind words, and especially the feedback. I, too, had >been disappointed at the loss of prominence of the CMEs. I went in and >kind of cheated and fiddled specifically with the color balance of them >to bring them out a bit

Re: Eclipse photo rework

oh yeah - wow factor! ann On 9/2/2018 7:55 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: Excellent. I like your latest version. Paul On Sep 2, 2018, at 5:51 AM, Larry Colen wrote: Cotty, Thanks for the kind words, and especially the feedback. I, too, had been disappointed at the loss of prominence of the

Re: Eclipse photo rework

Larry, that's a stunner. Much better than my eclipse photos. What lens did you use? Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Eclipse photo rework

Excellent. I like your latest version. Paul > On Sep 2, 2018, at 5:51 AM, Larry Colen wrote: > > Cotty, > > Thanks for the kind words, and especially the feedback. I, too, had been > disappointed at the loss of prominence of the CMEs. I went in and kind of > cheated and fiddled

Re: Eclipse photo rework

Cotty, Thanks for the kind words, and especially the feedback. I, too, had been disappointed at the loss of prominence of the CMEs. I went in and kind of cheated and fiddled specifically with the color balance of them to bring them out a bit better in the yellow shifted version of the photo.

Re: Eclipse photo rework

On 1/9/18, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed: >I've been nibbling away at photos to show at my party next week. I just >did a rework of one of my eclipse photos, including changing the color >balance to bring some color into the corona. > >Does the color temp change work? Any other

Eclipse photo rework

I've been nibbling away at photos to show at my party next week. I just did a rework of one of my eclipse photos, including changing the color balance to bring some color into the corona. Does the color temp change work? Any other suggestions for improvements?

Re: OT: Interesting eclipse photo

On 10/10/2015 1:26 AM, David Mann wrote: Certainly not your usual... http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap151009.html Cheers, Dave Glad it had an explanation, or I'd have never figured out what it was. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question.

Re: OT: Interesting eclipse photo

On Oct 12, 2015, at 7:45 AM, John wrote: > On 10/10/2015 1:26 AM, David Mann wrote: >> Certainly not your usual... >> >> http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap151009.html > > Glad it had an explanation, or I'd have never figured out what it was. That's why I found it so

Re: OT: Interesting eclipse photo

I've never thought of a Speed Graphic as a point and shoot. LOL. Cool pic though. Thanks for posting. Cheers, frank On October 10, 2015 1:26:26 AM EDT, David Mann wrote: >Certainly not your usual... > >http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap151009.html > >Cheers, >Dave --

OT: Interesting eclipse photo

Certainly not your usual... http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap151009.html Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: OT Cool annular eclipse photo

Heh, if I had driven 18 hours, I'd have made sure that someone was standing there. :) On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: Unbelievable On 7/16/2012 9:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote: It seems that someone just walked up and framed himself perfectly in the

Re: OT Cool annular eclipse photo

That's an amazing combination of hard work, skill, and luck. What a shot. On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: This link off that page is just brilliant:

Re: OT Cool annular eclipse photo

Unbelievable On 7/16/2012 9:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote: It seems that someone just walked up and framed himself perfectly in the shot: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2167595/Stunning-image-shows-boy-watching-solar-eclipse--taken-1-5-miles-away.html -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com

OT Cool annular eclipse photo

It seems that someone just walked up and framed himself perfectly in the shot: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2167595/Stunning-image-shows-boy-watching-solar-eclipse--taken-1-5-miles-away.html -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: OT Cool annular eclipse photo

I had seen the shot before, but had not read the story of the shot before. Thanks for the link! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: OT Cool annular eclipse photo

This link off that page is just brilliant: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2173486/How-different-man-look-Hilarious-portraits-photographer-Gordon-Stettinius-lesson-bad-taste.html It's a series of self portraits where he intentionally makes himself up with different haircuts, beard trims

OT: Interesting eclipse photo

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070322.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Eclipse Photo

William Peifer wrote: The picture on the NASA site is described in the caption as a time-lapse sequence. Typically, shots like these are taken through a very strong filter (typically an optical density of 5 or so, corresponding to a filter factor of ~100,000). I remember a guy on a

Re: Eclipse Photo

I wonder what calculations the photographer used to get the nearly pefect spacing of each exposure? Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a great photo of this week's eclipse on today's Astonomy Picture of the Day: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html -- Daniel J.

Re: Eclipse Photo

From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Eclipse Photo There is a great photo of this week's eclipse on today's Astonomy Picture of the Day: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html That is a brilliant photo! Wish I'd got to see it :-( There are a couple of good ones

RE: Eclipse Photo

An interval timer that took a picture every n seconds. Len --- -Original Message- From: smcforme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Eclipse Photo I wonder what calculations the photographer used to get the nearly

RE: Eclipse Photo

seconds. Len --- -Original Message- From: smcforme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Eclipse Photo I wonder what calculations the photographer used to get the nearly pefect spacing of each exposure? Daniel J. Matyola wrote

RE: Eclipse Photo

Wendy Beard wrote: The picture of the day in Daniels's link looks like it was taken normally without any filters - otherwise how else would the golden gate bridge appear on the photo? [Snip] How do you do it? Hi Wendy, The picture on the NASA site is described in the caption as a

Re: Eclipse Photo

get a peak of the sun it would not be much if any worse than if you did so without a lens. I probably would hesitate to do so with the 400mm however! PLEASE BE CAREFUL WITH YOUR EYES! wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Daniel J. Matyola Subject: Eclipse Photo There is a great photo

Re: Eclipse Photo

Well, Since the apparent motion of the sun is constant, all the photographer had to do was take a picture every X minuites. He took 18 frames (counting the number of suns in the picture), and the eclipse in San Fransiscio took T time. All he had to do to find X is simple math: T/18 = X

Re[2]: Eclipse Photo

Hi, I read up on this stuff before the total eclipse of 1999 in Pasachoff's book, and although I didn't get any decent photos of my own I did learn a few things. The book includes examples similar to this one. The moon and the sun move at reasonably constant speeds relative to the earth, so we

Re: Eclipse photo

If I ever managed to catch an image like this I think I would just sit around and be pleased with myself for about a month. I'd like to know how they decided on the exposure. Great Pic! Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 463-8873

Re: Eclipse photo

Is it my new monitor, or do the sun and moon appear oval in this photo? Regards, Bob S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The astronomy picture of the day today has a grea photo of an annular eclipse. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss

Re: Eclipse photo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The astronomy picture of the day today has a grea photo of an annular eclipse. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html Is it my new monitor, or do the sun and moon appear oval in this photo? Blame it on the atmosphere. The