In a message dated 4/15/2007 9:39:55 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK.
I'm still a bit confused. I understand the tax part, but I'm
struggling with it being used in conjunction with the word return.
scratches head
Cheers,
Dave
==
Some people get money
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/16 Mon AM 02:08:33 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Enablement -- Bad PMDL, Good PDML
Here we get a chance to fight for our money rather than just letting
the government take it:-).
Paul
We have the same
At 03:10 PM 16/04/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/15/2007 9:39:55 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK.
I'm still a bit confused. I understand the tax part, but I'm
struggling with it being used in conjunction with the word return.
scratches head
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, what we send them are tax forms. What they return are returns.
I have not yet experienced a return.
Actually, you have. It's called a return because they keep returning
to take more of your hard-earned money. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML
Smart lady!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not yet experienced a return.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
It is money people lend the government with no interest. In the US we
have a federal income tax that is collected with payroll withholding by
your employer. People declare less deductions than they are allowed and
thus their tax is over paid. When they file their tax returns at the
beginning
That's the assumption that makes it all a farce. None of it is the
Government's money...
graywolf wrote:
It is money people lend the government with no interest. In the US we
have a federal income tax that is collected with payroll withholding by
your employer. People declare less
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Enablement -- Bad PMDL, Good PDML
That's the assumption that makes it all a farce. None of it is the
Government's money...
Wrong.
The government gets to decide how much of what you earn is their money, and
then creates
I understand the reason for taxation. I believe it's a necessary evil.
What really gets my goat is the fact that:
a) The government encourages people to save for the future so the
social security system wont collapse in a heap when the baby boomers
all retire start drawing their pension. But
I calculated what the interest on my money would have been
considering if I'd put the entire amount that the government owes me
back into the highest return financial instrument I have available to
me for an entire year ... it comes to $21.
I guess for some people, that $21 is a make or
Your government does,. maybe. However that's not the theory behind
ours. Practice has gotten very out of step with theory.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Enablement -- Bad PMDL, Good PDML
That's the assumption that makes it all
be
another revolution...
-graywolf
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Enablement -- Bad PMDL, Good PDML
That's the assumption that makes it all a farce. None of it is the
Government's money...
Wrong.
The government gets to decide how much
[...] Whether the money belongs to them or
not, philosophically, is irrelevant from a practical standpoint:
government will take its tithe.
Godfrey
in case anyone is interested, Peter Singer (top philosophy dog at
Princeton) has a brief discussion about this in his excellent book
The
Well, I had had the DA 50-200 ordered at Adorama, but it was debatable when
it would come. It showed in stock when I actually ordered it, but it got out
of stock right after I ordered it.
Frankly, I blame the list. ;-) We had just discussed the 50-200. I had asked
about it and got replies
Bah,
Taxes can wait...
Oh, uh... no they cant ;)
CW
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 9:50 AM
Subject: Enablement -- Bad PMDL, Good PDML
Well, I had had the DA 50-200 ordered at Adorama, but it was debatable
when
What ya mean? You have all the way to Tuesday Midnight to get 'em
postmarked... ;-)
G
... feelin' happy i got mine done a week ago ...
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:17 AM, cbwaters wrote:
Bah,
Taxes can wait...
Oh, uh... no they cant ;)
CW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 4/15/2007 7:30:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What ya mean? You have all the way to Tuesday Midnight to get 'em
postmarked... ;-)
G
... feelin' happy i got mine done a week ago ...
==
I've never hated you for your photography. I've
amen!
On 4/15/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What ya mean? You have all the way to Tuesday Midnight to get 'em
postmarked... ;-)
G
... feelin' happy i got mine done a week ago ...
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:17 AM, cbwaters wrote:
Bah,
Taxes can wait...
Oh, uh... no they
Since April 15th falls on a Sunday (today), tax returns would normally be
due on Monday. But Monday is a holiday in Washington D.C., which makes it a
'national holiday' - meaning tax returns are due on Tuesday, April 17th (or
file the Automatic Extension of Time to file Form 4868).
The list giveth. The list taketh away.
So ends the lesson for today.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I had had the DA 50-200 ordered at Adorama, but it was debatable when
it would come. It showed in stock when I actually ordered it, but it got out
of stock right after I ordered it.
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... feelin' happy i got mine done a week ago ...
I've never hated you for your photography. I've been magnanimous
about that.
But I sort of hate you now.
About the same level of hate I have for my partner, I hope.
He had his tax
Hmmm. My tax returns come out of the bank:-(. But I don't let the
government hold my money :-).
Paul
On Apr 15, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... feelin' happy i got mine done a week ago ...
I've never hated you for your
I try to let them hold as little of my money as possible, but I
always over-pay during the year by a little bit to make sure I don't
have to come up with more cash at tax day. Takes the bite out of it
to get even a little bit back.
Godfrey
On Apr 15, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
At 04:42 AM 16/04/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... feelin' happy i got mine done a week ago ...
I've never hated you for your photography. I've been magnanimous
about that.
But I sort of hate you now.
About the same level of
Here we get a chance to fight for our money rather than just letting
the government take it:-).
Paul
On Apr 15, 2007, at 10:05 PM, David Savage wrote:
At 04:42 AM 16/04/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... feelin' happy i got mine done a
On 16/04/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here we get a chance to fight for our money rather than just letting
the government take it:-).
Here too, however the fight is seriously biased towards the
Government, particularly in the case of the implementation of
retrospective tax
OK.
I'm still a bit confused. I understand the tax part, but I'm
struggling with it being used in conjunction with the word return.
scratches head
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/16/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here we get a chance to fight for our money rather than just letting
the
27 matches
Mail list logo
