Re: Epson 2450 results

2002-11-22 Thread Steve Sharpe
At 11:07 AM -0800 11/20/02, Bruce Dayton wrote: Just for those who are wondering, I have been doing some comparative scans of slides with my Epson 2450 and Minolta Dimage Scan Dual II. What I am finding is that the Epson is delivering a more usable scan. Basically I think that the diffused

Epson 2450 results

2002-11-20 Thread Bruce Dayton
Just for those who are wondering, I have been doing some comparative scans of slides with my Epson 2450 and Minolta Dimage Scan Dual II. What I am finding is that the Epson is delivering a more usable scan. Basically I think that the diffused light source in the lid is hiding more

RE: Epson 2450 results

2002-11-20 Thread tom
Are you making prints? Are you talking about 35mm or just 67? -- Thomas Van Veen Photography www.bigdayphoto.com 301-758-3085 -Original Message- From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:08 PM To: PDML Subject: Epson 2450 results Just

Re[2]: Epson 2450 results

2002-11-20 Thread Bruce Dayton
: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:08 PM To: PDML Subject: Epson 2450 results Just for those who are wondering, I have been doing some comparative scans of slides with my Epson 2450 and Minolta Dimage Scan Dual II. What I am finding

Re: Epson 2450 results

2002-11-20 Thread Dan Scott
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 01:07 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: I have been doing some comparative scans of slides with my Epson 2450 and Minolta Dimage Scan Dual II. What I am finding is that the Epson is delivering a more usable scan. Any questions, let me know. Bruce Hi Bruce,