back. and by chance my garden provided
two large spiders to serve as photographic subjects.
So - here are my first macro shots with the Pentax Q:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/blog6.php/2012/09/01/two-spiders
The light today is quite flat as the remnants of Isaac roll through the
area
the striking spider shots in the post
that Darren shared a while back. and by chance my garden provided two large
spiders to serve as photographic subjects.
So - here are my first macro shots with the Pentax Q:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/blog6.php/2012/09/01/two-spiders
that Darren shared a while back. and by chance my garden provided two large
spiders to serve as photographic subjects.
So - here are my first macro shots with the Pentax Q:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/blog6.php/2012/09/01/two-spiders
The light today is quite flat as the remnants of Isaac
first macro shots with the Pentax Q:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/blog6.php/2012/09/01/two-spiders
The light today is quite flat as the remnants of Isaac roll through the area,
and this afternoon we had a pretty good rain, so no other chances to take the
system out.
A few
Pentax did build solid K mount lenses, they're called the K series from
1975.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Mark
C
- The Zoom lens is a joy to work with.
to try with the Q and D-FA 100mm macro
lens. I was thinking about the striking spider shots in the post that Darren
shared a while back. and by chance my garden provided two large spiders to
serve as photographic subjects.
So - here are my first macro shots with the Pentax Q:
http
:27 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: GESO - First Macro Shots with Pentax Q (And First Q impressions)
My Pentax Q arrived on Wednesday, a full day sooner than expected. I had
planned to leave first thing that morning for a business trip, but was
delayed by a few hours and luckily was able
The M and A series were quite fine as well. The F's were horrible and
the FA / DA / D-FA's are a mixed bag, generally better than the F's but
leaving a lot to be desired. I do not have any FA* or DA* lenses, so
maybe they are up to snuff
On 9/1/2012 9:41 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
Pentax
Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Mark
C
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 7:27 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: GESO - First Macro Shots with Pentax Q (And First Q impressions)
My Pentax Q arrived on Wednesday, a full day sooner than
] On Behalf Of
Mark
C
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 7:27 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: GESO - First Macro Shots with Pentax Q (And First Q impressions)
My Pentax Q arrived on Wednesday, a full day sooner than expected. I had
planned to leave first thing that morning for a business
: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Mark
C
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 9:57 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO - First Macro Shots with Pentax Q (And First Q
impressions)
The M and A series were quite fine as well. The F's were horrible and
the FA
Yep it is soft. This shot did remind me of my Tammy SP 70-120 3.5-4
Macro 1:2 (long name heh?).
Took it outside and took a couple shots... soft. :(
I thought it was a bit better but well ..
John, as you can see, even a old but high end macro (1:2) zoom is
quite soft. Considering this, I think
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:59 PM, John Gravesjh.gra...@verizon.net wrote:
Thought I'd see what my Sigma 70-300 would do in macro mode. Any and all
comments are appreciated. My first reaction was that there is depth of
field in this beast. Is Depth of field an experiment. Also the tripod came
Thought I'd see what my Sigma 70-300 would do in macro mode. Any and
all comments are appreciated. My first reaction was that there is
depth of field in this beast. Is Depth of field an experiment. Also
the tripod came out quickly. But it was fun
Look here:
It looks slightly soft - could be movement of the leaf. It's so small
and there is no metadata, so I don't know what you shot it at, i.e.:
zoom focal length, shutter speed, etc..
It looks typical, is my 2 cents worth. :-)
On Aug 2, 2009, at 15:59 , John Graves wrote:
Thought I'd see
Jack, Bob, Brian,
Thanks for your comments!
I agree about the stem; I kinda like the OOF green
stuff, though.
At 100% tiny little beads of nectar (?) are visible on
the stamens, so focus isn't a problem in the original
image. I probably should have sharpened it more for
the jpg conversion.
@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 8:50 PM
Subject: PESO: First macro
Inspired by the lousy snowless January landscape in
Philadelphia and the March PUG topic, I have
undertaken my first explorations of macro photography.
Here is one of the fruits of that effort:
http://photo.net/photodb
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 8:50 PM
Subject: PESO: First macro
Inspired by the lousy snowless January landscape
in
Philadelphia and the March PUG topic, I have
undertaken my first explorations of macro
Inspired by the lousy snowless January landscape in
Philadelphia and the March PUG topic, I have
undertaken my first explorations of macro photography.
Here is one of the fruits of that effort:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6937159size=lg
K10D, FA 50/2.8 macro, ISO 400, f/11 @ 1/50,
Lovely and innovative! It would be great to get rid of the stem in
upper left and the other background stuff on the right. You're gonna
set a high bar for the months PUG.
Regards, Bob S.
On Feb 10, 2008 8:50 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inspired by the lousy snowless January
Very nice, Rick. I like the translucent effect.
It might be improved by removing the stem on the left and possibly the out of
focus vegetation on the right.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Beautiful carnation. Variegated color fringed peddles make a nice
subject.
I think more light on the top and a crisp focus would really help it
pop. Sort of undefined soft lines that would do well to be more clearly
defined.
There is some mildly distracting mottling within the frame that might
be
On 4/9/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Well, the poppies are still blooming. Galia so much wanted to have a
photo of ladybug (if you see the pic and I am mistaken in English,
please correct me)... So I took my tripod, attached a 2x matching
converter to my Tamron 90/2.5 SP
I like the ladybug shot. Nice.
Tom C.
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: First Macro Stuff
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 20:43:51 +0200
Hi!
Well, the poppies are still blooming. Galia so much wanted to have a photo
of ladybug
On 10/4/05, Peter Williams, discombobulated, unleashed:
'ladybird' is the British name of what you call a 'ladybug' :-)
It's also what we call them here in Australia where we use
proper English.
Apologies Peter - forgive my bad.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On Apr 10, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 9/4/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/boris71/8902760/
Well done Boris - that's one of the nicest ladybird pics I've ever
seen!
Hear hear... great photo. Put it on the wall.
In these parts we call that plane
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 2:43 PM
Subject: First Macro Stuff
Hi!
Well, the poppies are still blooming. Galia so much wanted to have a photo
of ladybug (if you see
Hi!
Nice shot of the ladybug, Boris - is looks to be quite sharp and the DOF
is just right.
I'm not familiar with the Tamron - I assume the 2x adapter lets you go
to 2x lifesized?
No, Mark, you're quite wrong. It is very simple. The lens itself is
90/2.5 that can go only 1:2 lifesize. With
Hi!
Well, the poppies are still blooming. Galia so much wanted to have a
photo of ladybug (if you see the pic and I am mistaken in English,
please correct me)... So I took my tripod, attached a 2x matching
converter to my Tamron 90/2.5 SP and headed to the field...
On 9/4/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/boris71/8902760/
Well done Boris - that's one of the nicest ladybird pics I've ever seen!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Ladybird, she use to be the first lady...
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: First Macro Stuff
On 9/4/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
http
On 9/4/05, Kenneth Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ladybird, she use to be the first lady...
'ladybird' is the British name of what you call a 'ladybug' :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
In the US, we call that an ultralight airplane. Small, cheap, easy to
construct, and you don't need a full pilot's license to fly one.
Very nice picture with the poppies in the field. :-)
-Mat
On 4/9/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, while on the field, we've been attacked by
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.flickr.com/photos/boris71/8902760/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/boris71/8902759/
Nice ladybird :-)
The plane is just generically called an ultralight
here in Australia. They are usually homebuilt,
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'ladybird' is the British name of what you call a 'ladybug' :-)
It's also what we call them here in Australia where we use
proper English.
--
Peter Williams
35 matches
Mail list logo
