On 21 April 2010 03:20, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
That was maliciously cruel.
Can there be benevolent cruelty?
regards, Anthony
Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight
(Anon)
--
PDML
On 4/21/2010 5:12 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
On 21 April 2010 03:20, John Sessomsjsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
That was maliciously cruel.
Can there be benevolent cruelty?
If you're doing if for the victims own good...
regards, Anthony
Of what use is lens and light
2010/4/21 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
That was maliciously cruel.
Can there be benevolent cruelty?
If you're doing if for the victims own good...
... or even entertainment... some folks pay for that. It's an ache
thing - I wouldn't understand.
Cheers
Ecke
--
PDML
Rob Studdert wrote:
News today along similar lines:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/21/2879025.htm?section=justin
Love the (unrelated) headline in the right-hand sidebar: As European
airspace reopens, the rush for the first flights out of Australia
begins. Don't blame 'em ;-)
--
From: Mark Roberts
Rob Studdert wrote:
News today along similar lines:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/21/2879025.htm?section=justin
Love the (unrelated) headline in the right-hand sidebar: As European
airspace reopens, the rush for the first flights out of Australia
begins.
On 21/4/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
As European
airspace reopens, the rush for the first flights out of Australia
begins. Don't blame 'em ;-)
LOL. Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Apr 20, 2010, at 21:34 , Rob Studdert wrote:
On 21/04/2010, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Miserere wrote:
Somebody should've told this lady that with great Photoshop power
comes great responsibility.
I used that line in class today. Class went very well, incidentally.
- Original Message -
From: Joseph McAllister
Subject: Re: Archived Becky Carter horrors?
News today along similar lines:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/21/2879025.htm?section=justin
Fly's in the face of face recognition. It's criminal!
We did half a dozen schools
2010/4/20 Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com:
http://photographybykarensonnier.com/karen_003.htm
be warned; it isn't pretty.
Apparently that niche is large enough for several photographers... :-(
http://highglitz.com/gallery/index.html
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
Google image search Toddlers and Tiaras and High Glitz
I don't think it's all PhotoShop. Looks like they're taking
these kids and applying extreme makeup before photographing
them and THEN doing extreme PhotoShop makeovers.
You know, I'd like to make a living at photography, but I
On 20/04/2010, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently that niche is large enough for several photographers... :-(
http://highglitz.com/gallery/index.html
Eeeuw, most of those poor little darlings don't look at all happy ;-(
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870
2010/4/20 Bob W p...@web-options.com:
I don't think it's all PhotoShop. Looks like they're taking
these kids and applying extreme makeup before photographing
them and THEN doing extreme PhotoShop makeovers.
You know, I'd like to make a living at photography, but I
just couldn't do that to
On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Miserere wrote:
I will now delete this thread.
What has been seen cannot be unseen.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
2010/4/20 Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com:
http://photographybykarensonnier.com/karen_003.htm
be warned; it isn't pretty.
if you look closely, there are even reflexes missing in some of the
poor kids' eyes, bottom right hand is an extremely bad example.
Those images all look like Mattel release
2010/4/20 eckinator eckina...@gmail.com:
Now if only we could get Marvel to release plug-ins for
guys...
The Batman look is easier to achieve by styling.
Cheers,
Joker
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific work of Becky Carter
but her site no longer exists and archive.org only has the index page
AlunFoto wrote:
2010/4/20 Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com:
http://photographybykarensonnier.com/karen_003.htm
be warned; it isn't pretty.
Apparently that niche is large enough for several photographers... :-(
http://highglitz.com/gallery/index.html
Jostein
I think that one may be going for
On 20 April 2010 08:12, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that one may be going for irony. Read her bio.
I see she's exhibiting at Contact in Toronto in May, so I can see them
first-hand if I so desire.
Not! ;-)
-bmw
Don't forget your pitchfork if you do go. Maybe Frank
Miserere wrote:
On 20 April 2010 08:12, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that one may be going for irony. Read her bio.
I see she's exhibiting at Contact in Toronto in May, so I can see them
first-hand if I so desire.
Not! ;-)
-bmw
Don't forget your pitchfork if you do
On 4/20/2010 2:24 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
2010/4/20 Doug Brewerd...@alphoto.com:
http://photographybykarensonnier.com/karen_003.htm
be warned; it isn't pretty.
Apparently that niche is large enough for several photographers... :-(
http://highglitz.com/gallery/index.html
Jostein
From: Bob W
Google image search Toddlers and Tiaras and High Glitz
I don't think it's all PhotoShop. Looks like they're taking
these kids and applying extreme makeup before photographing
them and THEN doing extreme PhotoShop makeovers.
You know, I'd like to make a living at
On 20 April 2010 12:09, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Then if they want to be a Barbie Doll, that's fine with me. Different
strokes for different folks. I just don't think it's fair to kids.
Or cats, for that matter, but that hasn't stopped anyone from humiliating them.
I expect
On 20/4/10, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
It would make you look like a Ken doll. Would you want that?
Ken Rockwell?
http://www.kenrockwell.com/about.htm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
From: Miserere
On 20 April 2010 12:09, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Then if they want to be a Barbie Doll, that's fine with me. Different
strokes for different folks. I just don't think it's fair to kids.
Or cats, for that matter, but that hasn't stopped anyone from
On 20 April 2010 12:46, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Miserere
Or cats, for that matter, but that hasn't stopped anyone from humiliating
them.
I expect to soon see LOL Kids popping up on Flickr.
Curiosity got the better of me, so I put LOL Kids in the search box for
Mark!
Marnie :-)
In a message dated 4/19/2010 6:09:33 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
miser...@gmail.com writes:
Somebody should've told this lady that with great Photoshop power
comes great responsibility.
--M.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I don't know whether to LOL or gag.
Marnie aka Doe
---
In a message dated 4/20/2010 12:23:50 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
p...@web-options.com writes:
I wonder if there's a gap in the market for doing it to middle-aged men.
That would take the notion of good taste
From: Cotty
On 20/4/10, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
It would make you look like a Ken doll. Would you want that?
Ken Rockwell?
http://www.kenrockwell.com/about.htm
That was maliciously cruel.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://www.kenrockwell.com/about.htm
On 20/4/10, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
That was maliciously cruel.
;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Cotty
On 20/4/10, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
It would make you look like a Ken doll. Would you want that?
Ken Rockwell?
http://www.kenrockwell.com/about.htm
That was maliciously cruel.
not at all - go with it , Mark!
ann
--
PDML
Bet you can do both at the same time.
I don't know whether to LOL or gag.
Marnie aka Doe
---
In a message dated 4/20/2010 12:23:50 A.M. Pacific Daylight
Time, p...@web-options.com writes:
I wonder if there's a gap in the market for doing it to
It would make you look like a Ken doll. Would you want that?
Ken Rockwell?
http://www.kenrockwell.com/about.htm
I was thinking more along the lines of Grayson Perry
http://airstripone.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/claire.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Miserere wrote:
Somebody should've told this lady that with great Photoshop power
comes great responsibility.
I used that line in class today. Class went very well, incidentally.
Students were appalled by the Becky Carter site (many looking at in
horrified fascination for some time - a bit like
On 4/20/2010 1:20 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Cotty
On 20/4/10, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
It would make you look like a Ken doll. Would you want that?
Ken Rockwell?
http://www.kenrockwell.com/about.htm
That was maliciously cruel.
Yes, yes it wax. But amusing none the
On 21/04/2010, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Miserere wrote:
Somebody should've told this lady that with great Photoshop power
comes great responsibility.
I used that line in class today. Class went very well, incidentally.
Students were appalled by the Becky Carter site (many
Yep, Metro-sexual... (Metro in Russian - subway)...
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:46 AM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/20 Bob W p...@web-options.com:
I don't think it's all PhotoShop. Looks like they're taking
these kids and applying extreme makeup before photographing
them and THEN
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific work of Becky Carter
but her site no longer exists and archive.org only has the index page
http://web.archive.org/web/20080124003151/http://beckycarter.com/
Did anyone happen to
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of
portrait retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific
work of Becky Carter but her site no longer exists and
archive.org only has the index page
http://web.archive.org/web/20080124003151/http://beckycarter.com/
Did anyone
Bob W wrote:
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of
portrait retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific
work of Becky Carter but her site no longer exists and
archive.org only has the index page
http://web.archive.org/web/20080124003151/http://beckycarter.com/
On 4/19/2010 7:05 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific work of Becky Carter
but her site no longer exists and archive.org only has the index page
You could install the trial version of Portraiture II plugin and
crank it up a bit.
http://www.imagenomic.com/
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, April 19, 2010, 4:05:53 PM, you wrote:
MR Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
MR retouching. I'd like to show some of
Mark Roberts wrote:
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific work of Becky Carter
but her site no longer exists and archive.org only has the index page
http://web.archive.org/web/20080124003151/http://beckycarter.com/
Mark Roberts wrote:
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific work of Becky Carter
but her site no longer exists and archive.org only has the index page
http://web.archive.org/web/20080124003151/http://beckycarter.com/
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: Archived Becky Carter horrors?
You could install the trial version of Portraiture II plugin and
crank it up a bit.
I tried doing that once to see if that was what she was doing.
It didn't work.
I think she was actually dipping
On 4/19/2010 7:54 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific work of Becky Carter
but her site no longer exists and archive.org only has the index page
On 19 April 2010 19:55, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific work of Becky Carter
but her site no longer exists and archive.org only has the index page
From: Mark Roberts
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific work of Becky Carter
but her site no longer exists and archive.org only has the index page
http://web.archive.org/web/20080124003151/http://beckycarter.com/
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:54 -0400, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Tomorrow my Photoshop class is going to be on the topic of portrait
retouching. I'd like to show some of the horrific work of Becky Carter
but her site no longer exists and archive.org only has the
In a message dated 2/4/2007 10:32:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And now, just to be *slightly* on-topic, here's a new PESO, the latest
version of my Live Oak BW conversion:
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
Not quite there yet, but I find it's best to make some
Mark, I cannot be certain if it is of any importance, but now I can
successfully access your pages from my home PC. Nice tree by the way.
Boris
Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, after 24-or-so hours of work I have my web site up and running on a
new host... mostly. My former host lost connectivity on
Mark Roberts wrote:
And now, just to be *slightly* on-topic, here's a new PESO, the latest
version of my Live Oak BW conversion:
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
Not quite there yet, but I find it's best to make some changes and then
wait a couple of days before looking at it and
Mark Cassino wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
And now, just to be *slightly* on-topic, here's a new PESO, the latest
version of my Live Oak BW conversion:
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
Not quite there yet, but I find it's best to make some changes and
then
wait a couple of days before
OK, after 24-or-so hours of work I have my web site up and running on a
new host... mostly. My former host lost connectivity on Monday and I
grew increasing suspicious about how they were handling it... until I
lost all patience yesterday and signed up with a new hosting company.
All that's
Looks virtually prehistoric. Like the lighted feeders' against the
darker trunk. Texture details always add much interest.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, after 24-or-so hours of work I have my web site up and running on
a
new host... mostly. My former host lost
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 07:18 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
At least you didn't DEVELOP the film in FIXER, as I once did.
I've know people who've developed their film in bleach and sepia toner.
Neither are adequate replacements for D-76.
They also both smell so distinctively bad that I
You wouldn't believe what darkroom error I managed today... I am still
banging my head on the wall...
I just have to share this funny story to alleviate the anger.
I developed 4 negs in my jobo tank, stopped, fixed and proceeded to
hypo clear. I hypocleared them well, than 'where is the wash
Hi,
At least you didn't DEVELOP the film in FIXER, as I once did.
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
You wouldn't believe what darkroom error I managed today...
I was washing it NOT with water but with HYPOCLEARING
AGENT!!!
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Horror? Come one - it's not like you poured fixer instead of a developer, is
it?
ukasz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Tuesday, April 09, 2002, 6:44:08 PM, ukasz wrote:
K Horror? Come one - it's not like you poured fixer instead of a developer, is
K it?
K ukasz
And Shel wrote:
SB At least you didn't DEVELOP the film in FIXER, as I once did.
Well, I did that actually too... but it's a lot time ago (knock on
Hi,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
snicker
tale of woe
snack
OK, now that you've heard my take of woe, what could be causing the
developer to go bad so quickly?
What water are you using? The water company might have been
flushing lines or something like that Not enough to cause
problems in the
At 11:00 PM 2/27/02 -0800, you wrote:
Yes, it's scary in the dark - strange odors and sounds, creaking floor
boards, eerily glowing lights. But that's like the Tunnel of Love
compared to the last couple of days trying to process a couple of rolls
of film.
You did better than me, Shel - on
Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
Do you have a rough idea of what the
pH of that ID-11 batch is supposed to
be?
Not off hand.
Is it possible that the stuff will
support the growth of microbes?
I suppose it's possible, but it would be a first for me that I know of.
It's conceivable
I can certainly sympathize with you. I almost did the same thing, but
caught it before pouring the developer in to the tank. I hope your next
experience goes a bit better, Mark. Well, actually a lot better.
Mark Cassino wrote:
You did better than me, Shel - on Tuesday I shot 4 rolls of
Shel wrote:
Shouldn't this problem have shown itself sooner if the spores were in
the bottle from new? If not from new, then this would have had to have
been a relatively recent spore or bacteria invasion, right?
Hi Shel,
Yes, you'd think spores in a new bottle might get activated and start
Shel wrote:
I filled the offending (offensive?) bottle with boiling water and let it
sit for a while When the bottle cooled enough I poured out the water -
UGH! brown, brown, BROWN! So, it seems that there was something
going on inside that particular bottle
Glad to hear you got to the root
Further tests have shown that, even cool water gets discolored and,
perhaps, contaminated, when placed in this bottle. I filled it with
water at 70-degrees and let it stand a while, and when poured out the
water was slightly brown. I compared it to the same tap water I used to
fill the bottle.
Shel wrote:
The bottle is made of #7 plastic Is this a poor choice
for darkroom chemicals?
Hi Shel,
The #7 designation is apparently a recycling catch-all for all other
resins Here's what I learned from a State of Indiana website I just
found (That just happened to be the first one on the
I re-shot yesterday and developed the two rolls this morning - with the
correct amount of developer this time. So I'm happy to say things have
indeed gone better...
Cheers -
MCC
At 06:42 AM 2/28/02 -0800, you wrote:
I can certainly sympathize with you. I almost did the same thing, but
Yes, it's scary in the dark - strange odors and sounds, creaking floor
boards, eerily glowing lights. But that's like the Tunnel of Love
compared to the last couple of days trying to process a couple of rolls
of film.
Friday night I mixed a batch of ID-11 in preparation for processing a
few
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I grabbed the wrong tank It's enough to drive a man to digital! or at
least to some 25yo Springbank
I wouldn't be so quick to go digital; I'm having major headaches
regarding colour management with my scanner at the moment :(
Maybe I ought to start shooting some BW
A heart attack for me.
- Ayash.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Mike Johnston wrote:
Re: Somewhat amusing
I guess it would help if I told you what the page was..
http://www.hermes.net.au/bayling/repair.html
SACRILEGE!!!
And at the very least, he should be wearing safety
71 matches
Mail list logo
