Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

John wrote: On 3/8/2016 3:13 PM, Larry Colen wrote: John wrote: On 3/8/2016 1:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote: No doubt, they do great work. There is a lot to recommend them, but we are talking about a website where the User Interface would have been considered clunky in the last century,

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

On 3/8/2016 3:13 PM, Larry Colen wrote: John wrote: On 3/8/2016 1:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote: No doubt, they do great work. There is a lot to recommend them, but we are talking about a website where the User Interface would have been considered clunky in the last century, and which has

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

Ricoh already owns Pentax.com, they're just reusing resources. On 3/9/2016 8:31 AM, Collin B wrote: Don't know if this feature was noticed or note, but it is nice to see that it's not under ricohimaging.com but under the pentax.com domain. http://www.pentax.com/en/pentaxff/ I thought pentax.com

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

Don't know if this feature was noticed or note, but it is nice to see that it's not under ricohimaging.com but under the pentax.com domain. http://www.pentax.com/en/pentaxff/ I thought pentax.com was gone. My mistake. And a pleasant one at that. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

Larry Colen wrote: >Speaking of websites, I've been trying to look at doing some printing at >Bay Photo, and I'm afraid that I have not been favorably impressed with >their website or ROES software. To start with, they specifically >disallow any characters other than alphanumeric in the

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

John wrote: On 3/8/2016 1:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote: No doubt, they do great work. There is a lot to recommend them, but we are talking about a website where the User Interface would have been considered clunky in the last century, and which has serious security flaws. Is it a problem

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

On 3/8/2016 1:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote: Ken Waller wrote: Speaking of websites, I've been trying to look at doing some printing at Bay Photo, and I'm afraid that I have not been favorably impressed with their website or ROES software. To start with, they specifically disallow any characters

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

Ken Waller wrote: Speaking of websites, I've been trying to look at doing some printing at Bay Photo, and I'm afraid that I have not been favorably impressed with their website or ROES software. To start with, they specifically disallow any characters other than alphanumeric in the password.

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

gt; Subject: Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site Darren Addy wrote: As a guy whose day job is mostly web sites, I must say that I'm impressed by the new K-1 web site. http://www.pentax.com/en/k-1/ Parts are still being built-out (example: Professional's perspectives, http://www.pentax.com/en

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > Is it five "steps" or five "stops"? With a step being 1dB or 1/3 stop, > there is a big difference between 15db, and 5dB, like a factor of 10. I've > been seeing it reported as five stops A step is a factor of two in

Re: Impressed by the K-1 web site

Darren Addy wrote: As a guy whose day job is mostly web sites, I must say that I'm impressed by the new K-1 web site. http://www.pentax.com/en/k-1/ Parts are still being built-out (example: Professional's perspectives, http://www.pentax.com/en/k-1/impressions/ and the K-1 Lens Lab- Owner's

Impressed by the K-1 web site

As a guy whose day job is mostly web sites, I must say that I'm impressed by the new K-1 web site. http://www.pentax.com/en/k-1/ Parts are still being built-out (example: Professional's perspectives, http://www.pentax.com/en/k-1/impressions/ and the K-1 Lens Lab- Owner's Gallery