Mark Roberts wrote:
>
I can't imagine why they're doing this instead
> of just reducing the price.
I think it's a good marketing move. The guy or gal who buys the scanner
will be shooting Kodak film, and he'll become rather proficient at
scanning that particular film stock. (Those who have done
Not necessarily so. Might the ploy be to encourage more usage - processing --
for "cheap film" and encourage use of K film where competitive product might
have been used otherwiseand protect list pricing during what me a rather
slow period for sales?Kodak seems to have had a hard tim
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Just got my Kodak RFS 3600 scanner working - WOW!
>
>
> Let's see, give them a $600 discount off the scanner or give
> them $600 in
> film which costs us only $250... An accounting/accountant
> mentality as the
> $600 in film
Let's see, give them a $600 discount off the scanner or give them $600 in
film which costs us only $250... An accounting/accountant mentality as the
$600 in film ultimately comes out of your total US Market sales.
So are there any stand alone dust/scratch removal programs like Nikon's
'digita
"aimcompute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That is truly amazing. I wonder what is up with Kodak?
>
>1. Do they want to unload the scanners that bad?
>2. Are they having problems selling the scanners?
>3. Do they want to get rid of the film that bad?
>
>100 X $6.00 a roll. That's 2/3 the price
That is truly amazing. I wonder what is up with Kodak?
1. Do they want to unload the scanners that bad?
2. Are they having problems selling the scanners?
3. Do they want to get rid of the film that bad?
100 X $6.00 a roll. That's 2/3 the price of the scanner itself. Makes one
wonder... if
2820 dpi seems a bit for me. Would be very interested to
>see how it compares to the Kodak.
>
>Thanks.
>Chris
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:
rk Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:40 PM
Subject: Just got my Kodak RFS 3600 scanner working - WOW!
> I didn't think going from the 2820dpi of my Minolta Scan Multi up to the
3600dpi
> of the Kodak scanner would be
OTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 6:40 PM
Subject: Just got my Kodak RFS 3600 scanner working - WOW!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
9 matches
Mail list logo
