On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 6:40 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/10/2011 7:43 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
A decade consists of 10 years. If the first decade of the Christian Era,
(screw political correctness), starts with year 1 then the last year of
a decade if you wish to
A decade is for (10) years as your rightly said. Unfortunately Dear
Pentaxians, no electronic gizmo today is ever remembered for (10)
years. Obsolescence is a mighty leveler, and (3) years is about all
you get before you start itching for something new, as that particular
model will not be
On 10/15/2011 6:40 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 15/10/2011 7:43 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
A decade consists of 10 years. If the first decade of the Christian Era,
(screw political correctness), starts with year 1 then the last year of
a decade if you wish to be consistent, ends with year 10, if you
A decade consists of 10 years. If the first decade of the Christian
Era, (screw political correctness), starts with year 1 then the last
year of a decade if you wish to be consistent, ends with year 10, if you
wish to be consistent. Besides when you refer to a decade such as the
sixties you
On 15/10/2011 7:43 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
A decade consists of 10 years. If the first decade of the Christian Era,
(screw political correctness), starts with year 1 then the last year of
a decade if you wish to be consistent, ends with year 10, if you wish to
be consistent. Besides when you
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite happy with the K-5 as an
all-around camera
http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/2011/10/pentax-k5-dslr-review.html
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (from dos4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 14/10/2011 1:47 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite happy with the K-5 as an
all-around camera
http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/2011/10/pentax-k5-dslr-review.html
The decade is still young.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:39 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/10/2011 1:47 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite happy with the K-5 as an
all-around camera
http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/2011/10/pentax-k5-dslr-review.html
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
On 14/10/2011 1:47 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite happy with the K-5 as an
all-around camera
http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/2011/10/pentax-k5-dslr-review.html
The decade is still
The convention is to count years from 1, there is no year zero. So,
it's was released last decade.
On 10/14/2011 2:27 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
On 14/10/2011 1:47 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite
On 14/10/2011 12:27 PM, John Francis wrote:
The decade is still young.
That rather depends on how you count - the K-5 was released in 2010.
Was that the last year of one decade, or the first year of the next?
I would think most competent reviewers would put the Nikon D700 ahead of
the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:33 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
The convention is to count years from 1, there is no year zero. So, it's
was released last decade.
That is the convention for centuries, but not typically for decades.
We speak of the 1990s, not the 200th decade
12 matches
Mail list logo
