Adam Maas schrieb:
> Note your K100D shares the DL finder.
>
> -Adam
Holy crap, that's true!
Has anybody done a side-by-side comparison of the two finders?
I'm starting to wonder whether I've got the right camera for my needs.
(+) higher sensor ISO than compacts
(+) noise reduction
(+) a Pentax
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:55:31AM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> >I'm using W2K All the power of WinXP, just as stable, No stupid
> >Microsoft tricks. (At least no more stupid Microsoft tricks than
> >Win98). It works well, with no muss or fuss. A rarity in the high
>
Supposedly Microsoft has exposed more OS features through the API in
WinXP. I don't know for sure, I haven't bothered to delve that deeply
in a very long time. I could try, I suppose to get newer Adobe
products to work on W2K, but I'd need newer Adobe Products, and a test
machine, (which I d
>
> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I would be surprised if a sufficiently skilled hack could
> make CS3 install on Win2k.
Or not 8-)
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for
P. J. Alling wrote:
>I'm using W2K All the power of WinXP, just as stable, No stupid
>Microsoft tricks. (At least no more stupid Microsoft tricks than
>Win98). It works well, with no muss or fuss. A rarity in the high
>tech world. Of course Adobe no longer writes software that
>supports it
wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "P. J. Alling" Subject: Re: K100D and raw converters
>
>
>
>> Two words, "WindowsXP Yuck".
>>
>
> Gee Peter, I'm happier with XP than I ever was with 98.
>
> William
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" Subject: Re: K100D and raw converters
> Two words, "WindowsXP Yuck".
Gee Peter, I'm happier with XP than I ever was with 98.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Note your K100D shares the DL finder.
-Adam
Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
> This is free form, I sacrificed the DL entry, as I don't have one and
> don't like pentamirrors. If a copy is altered, the original file remains
> ready to use.
>
> P. J. Alling schrieb:
>> Better not expect to use the Ds
Two words, "WindowsXP Yuck".
W. Guy Finley wrote:
> Two words: Adobe Lightroom. Public Beta, free for the next few
> months, supports Pentax PEF files natively with no conversion needed
> which is a far better way to edit the file anyway.
>
> Three more words: Adobe Photoshop CS3. Public Bet
This all sounds like upgrading to WinXP, which I am definitely not
planning. I like RSE, and am accostumed to work with it, and which works
fine for me. It was a question of editing one file once, to make it
continue working for me, no hassle.
Of course, valuable knowledge of pixmantec has been
This is free form, I sacrificed the DL entry, as I don't have one and
don't like pentamirrors. If a copy is altered, the original file remains
ready to use.
P. J. Alling schrieb:
> Better not expect to use the Ds to continue to work, seems he used it's
> location for the K10d or K100D string.
>
Better not expect to use the Ds to continue to work, seems he used it's
location for the K10d or K100D string.
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
>
>
>> I was just about to write a little program to convert my raw files in a
>> way that RSE can read them. Maybe I'll do this later,
Two words: Adobe Lightroom. Public Beta, free for the next few
months, supports Pentax PEF files natively with no conversion needed
which is a far better way to edit the file anyway.
Three more words: Adobe Photoshop CS3. Public Beta, goes up to the
release if you have CS2, 30 days if you
Mark Roberts escribió:
> Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
>
>> I was just about to write a little program to convert my raw files in a
>> way that RSE can read them. Maybe I'll do this later, because first I
>> tried the other way, and can tell you that it works, too. By editing
>> the camera list once
Thats probably a better solution. Changing the internal camera name in
the RAW file worked for me, but who knows what side effect it might have
on other programs.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
>
>
>>I was just about to write a little program to convert my raw files
Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
>I was just about to write a little program to convert my raw files in a
>way that RSE can read them. Maybe I'll do this later, because first I
>tried the other way, and can tell you that it works, too. By editing
the
> camera list once now all of my K100D PEFs are re
This will work for all the 6MP bodies except the D as the RAW format is
the same apart from the camera ID. The K10D uses a different format (As
does the *istD)
-Adam
Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a new K100D.
> I installed the sillypix software on my PC.
> It's a real PITA.
>
>
Hi,
I've got a new K100D.
I installed the sillypix software on my PC.
It's a real PITA.
I asked myself why RSE (which I really like and got accostumed to) does
not support K100D files, and searching the list I came across a thread,
where Gonz wrote this post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@p
18 matches
Mail list logo