On 3/16/2010 5:24 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 17/03/2010, Bruce Daytonbkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
One thing you have to be careful with is the K-x kit lens is the
18-55 which is a small, dark lens. Unless you compare viewfinders
with the exact same lens on, you will see differences
in a body.
I just read a post from Mark where he mentions that the viewfinder's a
bit small and darkish.
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually quite important to me and if
the KX' is dark, that would be a real sore point
On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:42 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Just to let you know, I just bought a K-x today. After the DS the
K10D, yeah the viewfinder is small but I bought one anyway...
Congratulations, Welcome to the club.
Yet another white one?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from
On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:42 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Just to let you know, I just bought a K-x today. After the DS the
K10D, yeah the viewfinder is small but I bought one anyway...
Congratulations, Welcome to the club.
Yet another white one?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Yet another white one?
No, just the regular black one.
Bong
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:29 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is unfortunatly true. The comparison isn't so bad if you compare the
K20D to the MZ-3, especially with the Eyepiece loupe installed on the K20D.
The MZ-3 finder isn't what I'd call great however. Of all
On 3/17/2010 2:20 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Larry Colenl...@red4est.com wrote:
Yet another white one?
No, just the regular black one.
Bong
I don't think any color of that camera could be called regular.
--
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I concur, I have the *ist D, K20D and K-x to compare and there is
little between them, looking though any of the digital bodies and an
LX is chalk and cheese, all the Pentax DSLR finders are crap in
comparison.
On 3/5/2010 4:12 PM, frank theriault wrote:
More than one person on this list has mentioned that the KX might fit
my needs in a body.
I just read a post from Mark where he mentions that the viewfinder's a
bit small and darkish.
Frank, I don't have KX, but I can offer you a question - do you
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Frank, I don't have KX, but I can offer you a question - do you often use
manual focusing on your *istD. If your answer is yes, then I would
prescribe you some caution. If you don't involve yourself with manually
focused
On Mar 16, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 3/5/2010 4:12 PM, frank theriault wrote:
More than one person on this list has mentioned that the KX might fit
my needs in a body.
I just read a post from Mark where he mentions that the
viewfinder's a
bit small and darkish.
Frank, I
One thing you have to be careful with is the K-x kit lens is the
18-55 which is a small, dark lens. Unless you compare viewfinders
with the exact same lens on, you will see differences that aren't
related to the viewfinder. I have in my possession an *istD, K10D
and K20D to compare against. I
On 17/03/2010, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
One thing you have to be careful with is the K-x kit lens is the
18-55 which is a small, dark lens. Unless you compare viewfinders
with the exact same lens on, you will see differences that aren't
related to the viewfinder. I have
on this list has mentioned that the KX might fit
my needs in a body.
I just read a post from Mark where he mentions that the viewfinder's a
bit small and darkish.
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually quite important to me
More than one person on this list has mentioned that the KX might fit
my needs in a body.
I just read a post from Mark where he mentions that the viewfinder's a
bit small and darkish.
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:12:30 -0500
frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually quite important to me and if
the KX' is dark, that would be a real sore point with me.
Frank, i never
and darkish.
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually quite important to me and if
the KX' is dark, that would be a real sore point with me.
Thanks!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier
On Mar 5, 2010, at 6:12 AM, frank theriault wrote:
More than one person on this list has mentioned that the KX might fit
my needs in a body.
I just read a post from Mark where he mentions that the viewfinder's a
bit small and darkish.
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder
that the viewfinder's a
ft bit small and darkish.
ft Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
ft The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually quite important to me and if
ft the KX' is dark, that would be a real sore point with me.
ft Thanks!
ft cheers,
ft frank
ft --
ft
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:12 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
More than one person on this list has mentioned that the KX might fit
my needs in a body.
I just read a post from Mark where he mentions that the viewfinder's a
bit small and darkish.
Is anyone able to compare the KX
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:12 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually quite important to me and if
the KX' is dark, that would be a real sore point with me.
I shied away
On 06/03/2010, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually quite important to me and if
the KX' is dark, that would be a real sore point with me.
Coming from the *istD you
...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually quite important to me and if
the KX' is dark, that would be a real sore point with me.
Coming from the *istD you will love what it can do Frank, it's
perfectly suited
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Go Frank, Go Frank . . .
What color is the important question. Nighttime black or snowy white?
Or It's so cold it's turning blue. I won't even mention that other
color.
There are those other cool colors now, too.
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Sam Longley samthegr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Bong, the focusing is deadly slow in liveview mode, but otherwise to
this noob seems quite zippy.
Which manner of focusing were you referring to?
...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2010, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone able to compare the KX viewfinder with that of the *istD?
The *istD's bright viewfinder is actually quite important to me and if
the KX' is dark, that would be a real sore point with me.
Coming from
26 matches
Mail list logo
