That image of the falls is stunning, Stan!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 2015, at 09:05 , Stanley Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
wrote:
I tried the pano feature first
Thanks Dan Larry and others who viewed/commented on my Falls shot.
I went back and re-did the pano within LR6 and then did another similar which
stitched 4 66MB files. The 3-frame stitch took 1min 15sec, the 4-frame stitch
took about 2 minutes to process. iMac OSX10.9, 3.2GHz processor, 24GB
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Apr 23, 2015, at 09:05 , Stanley Halpins...@stans-photography.info wrote:
I tried the pano feature first thing.
The same scene that I submitted for this month’s PUG. That one was stitched in
Photoshop 11.
Three 645Z dng files, each about 66MB. Selected the three,
The HDR and Pano tool sound very useful - I use Photoshop and it has
tools that do the same functions. Any idea if the tools in LR are the
same as those in PS, or are they an improvement? (I'm guessing that Mark
R. would know...)
Mark C.
On 4/22/2015 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I just spent
On Apr 23, 2015, at 09:05 , Stanley Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
wrote:
I tried the pano feature first thing.
The same scene that I submitted for this month’s PUG. That one was stitched
in Photoshop 11.
Three 645Z dng files, each about 66MB. Selected the three, searched and
Mark C wrote:
The HDR and Pano tool sound very useful - I use Photoshop and it has
tools that do the same functions. Any idea if the tools in LR are the
same as those in PS, or are they an improvement? (I'm guessing that Mark
R. would know...)
I don't have any information but knowing Adobe
Quoting Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net:
The HDR and Pano tool sound very useful - I use Photoshop and it has
tools that do the same functions. Any idea if the tools in LR are
the same as those in PS, or are they an improvement? (I'm guessing
that Mark R. would know...)
My understanding is
I tried the pano feature first thing.
The same scene that I submitted for this month’s PUG. That one was stitched in
Photoshop 11.
Three 645Z dng files, each about 66MB. Selected the three, searched and finally
found the merge-pano button, told it to do its thing. A few seconds later I
had a
I just spent some time playing with LR6s new HDR feature. At first
glance, I am very happy with it. It seems to do pretty much exactly
what I want in HDR, it takes several DNG files and combines them into
another DNG file with expanded dynamic range, and no tone mapping.
I'm not sure, but I
I tried it on some sets of shots that I had processed with Photomatix
Pro. The lightroom versions were quite good, it certainly is faster.
One thing is Photomatix pro will process a single file and help bring
out shadow detail.
You can create a copy in Lightroom and use it with the original
On Apr 22, 2015, at 14:31 , Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I just spent some time playing with LR6s new HDR feature. At first glance, I
am very happy with it. It seems to do pretty much exactly what I want in
HDR, it takes several DNG files and combines them into another DNG file
I've only done a little testing so far, but import, export, and 1:1 rendering
has become quite a bit quicker on my system. How much improvement you see is
dependent on what GPU your computer has.
Godfrey
On Apr 22, 2015, at 2:18 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
How is
On Apr 22, 2015, at 16:18 , Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
How is performance? Is the switch between library and develop any faster now?
I never really noticed any lag. Let me check.
About 3 seconds from viewing a thumbnail to preview generated and ready to
go at 1:1 for a K5 DNG
How is performance? Is the switch between library and develop any faster now?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 2015, at 14:31 , Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I just spent some time playing with LR6s new HDR feature. At first glance, I
14 matches
Mail list logo
