Re: SV: M42 to K mount question

2002-03-31 Thread David Brooks
whats happens Dave Begin Original Message From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 20:49:14 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SV: M42 to K mount question Hi Hi Dave I'm quite sure that the meter is normally not affected by the mount used. Provided that the lens

SV: SV: M42 to K mount question

2002-03-31 Thread Jens Bladt
meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne af David Brooks Sendt: 31. marts 2002 16:04 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: SV: M42 to K mount question Thanks Jens.I just find it strange that with an A or M lens on the K1000, i can get the meter needle to go from bottom

M42 to K mount question

2002-03-30 Thread David Brooks
Hi all.I tried out my new adaptor yesterday,using a Super Tak 200 f4 on the K1000.One thing i noticed was the light meter was noticably slower moving with the 200 that if the 35-80 or 80-200 was attached. Is this a common thing. Mind you the weather has been really cloudy and windy lately.

SV: M42 to K mount question

2002-03-30 Thread Jens Bladt
or by the way you turn the dials on the K1000. Are you sure that the aperture simulator is activated properly by the lens/aperture? Jens -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne af David Brooks Sendt: 30. marts 2002 20:19 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: M42 to K