I'm not offended, but some people seem to misunderstand my sense of
humor and irony, occasionally...
Y. Rowe wrote:
>> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Do I really have to use tags for this?
>>
>
> Mr. Alling, I apologize for offending you. I realize that you were bein
>From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Do I really have to use tags for this?
Mr. Alling, I apologize for offending you. I realize that you were being
sarcastic. We apparently share the same view of people who acquire tools and
pronounce themselves experts without benefit of educati
Mea Culpa, I meant to send that message to Sven off list.
I didn't want to bore everyone with so many non-Pentax photos.
All this cleaning up of my email is making me groggy... I'm sorry!
Jim
Must bite my tongue, must, must, must...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Re: Mea Culpa
Hey, Bill's a good guy. I've known him personally for a while now,
and can
vouch for his pills They may be why he's so nice and
re
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Re: Mea Culpa
Hey, Bill's a good guy. I've known him personally for a while now,
and can
vouch for his pills They may be why he's so nice and
respectful, and
referred to you as Mr. Robb.
I thought he w
OTECTED]>
> Date: 11/23/2004 6:37:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Mea Culpa
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Lawlor"
> Subject: Re: Mea Culpa
> > I take Mr. Robb's question to heart and will endeavor to see that
> > brain is engages before operating keyboards.
>
> And send me a few of those pills too.
>
> William Robb
>
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Lawlor"
Subject: Re: Mea Culpa
Sorry to have sent the digest again. I replied from a computer that
only had
webmail access and didn't realize the list was being included.
I take Mr. Robb's question to heart and will endeavor t
Sorry to have sent the digest again. I replied from a computer that only had
webmail access and didn't realize the list was being included.
I take Mr. Robb's question to heart and will endeavor to see that brain is
engages before operating keyboards.
Bill
Re-opening an old technical discussion:
My whole understand of DOF has been enlightened
and the explanations I provided earlier were in
serious error.
#1. DOF is directly tied to the opening of the diaphram. This is the major determiner
of DOF.
Lens design affect is somewhat, but that's a secon
>Frantisek,
>Don't worry about it. Just wait until you get more hypo and then re-fix and
>rewash the negatives. You'll be fine.
>--Mike
Thanks. That's exactly what I have done (unfortunately, not for the first
time. Must stock on hypo more this time ;)
It's just strange that when I am doing film
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Now the best part: I AM OUT OF HYPO! I ran out of concentrate and forgot to
> buy some more, and even the old "traditional" slow hypo I had in the closet
> seems to be gone bad.
I have a bottle of 'slow' fixer for just such an occasion. I bought it
by accident.
I be
Just in the middle of the weekend and about ten films to develop, I
discovered that my hypo "had just one too many rolls". The few last dev.
negs are streaked - underfixed, and the control strip of exposed but not
developed film took 6 minutes to clear! Should be 2 minutes at max. My, my.
12 matches
Mail list logo
