On Jun 16, 2011, at 02:03 , Ecke PDML wrote:
Sounds like it could be done with a macro rail except for the folding bit?
Cheers
Ecke
Could be. As long as you get consistent separation left to right. Couple of
marks on the rail would be good enough.
2011/6/16 Joseph McAllister
Nice stereo pairs can be made with a little gadget I picked up long ago. With
it you shoot one image (full frame film or sensor) then this pantograph or
parallelograph moves the camera up and over to a position an eye's distance
away, on the same plane.
______
\__\
Sounds like it could be done with a macro rail except for the folding bit?
Cheers
Ecke
2011/6/16 Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com:
Nice stereo pairs can be made with a little gadget I picked up long ago. With
it you shoot one image (full frame film or sensor) then this pantograph or
I know it won't work with digital because of the sensor dimension ... bummer.
Are you sure of that? Doesn't it just split the frame down the middle
into a left and right image? Does the format size or the field of
view make any difference?
The only limitation that comes to mind is that you
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:02:44PM +1000, Anthony Farr wrote:
I know it won't work with digital because of the sensor dimension ...
bummer.
Are you sure of that? Doesn't it just split the frame down the middle
into a left and right image? Does the format size or the field of
view
Just purchased a Pentax Stereo kit on eBay.
Goals:
1. I'll use it with some film for the fun of it..
I know it won't work with digital because of the sensor dimension ... bummer.
2. I wonder how well it will work with 4x5? 8x10?
Some experimentation is in order ...
First, shoot onto paper and
6 matches
Mail list logo
