http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08070901Hasselblad.asp
Pentax 645D where are you? :D
.t
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08070901Hasselblad.asp
Pentax 645D where are you? :D
The 645D was nailed to its perch but now it's pining for the fjords,
so to speak.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Apparently hiding under the bed...
On the other hand the formula Megapixels = Megapirce seems to hold here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08070901Hasselblad.asp
Pentax 645D where are you? :D
.t
--
You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with
Yeah. I think the $40K price tag leaves a bit of room for other models.
(What is the emoticon for overwhelming sarcasm?)
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/10/2008 8:36 AM
Apparently hiding under the bed...
On the other hand the formula Megapixels = Megapirce seems to hold
here.
[EMAIL
Don't know, but I suppose it would help if I could spell price...
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Yeah. I think the $40K price tag leaves a bit of room for other models.
(What is the emoticon for overwhelming sarcasm?)
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/10/2008 8:36 AM
Apparently
Remember, they sell a couple dozen of these a month. Small production
runs means huge prices.
-Adam
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah. I think the $40K price tag leaves a bit of room for other models.
(What is the emoticon for overwhelming
It seems on a per photo basis, (even a good size commercial operation),
would never amortize one of these over their useful lifetime. For most
studios on a cost per shot basis it's would be less expensive using
film. (Ok, so that's not even back of the envelope calculations but
that's what
I suppose they rent it, right?
On 7/10/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems on a per photo basis, (even a good size commercial operation),
would never amortize one of these over their useful lifetime. For most
studios on a cost per shot basis it's would be less expensive using
Most do.
-Adam
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose they rent it, right?
On 7/10/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems on a per photo basis, (even a good size commercial operation),
would never amortize one of these over their useful
If you rent it sometimes you don't have it when you need it. But that's
a possibility.
Fernando wrote:
I suppose they rent it, right?
On 7/10/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems on a per photo basis, (even a good size commercial operation),
would never amortize one of
High-end commercial shooters can justify 40K for a camera. Some of the best
gross that much in a couple days of shooting. And Hassy doesn't expect high
volume, so that market alone probably absorbs much of their production. Then
there are the ridiculously rich hobbyists who have to have the
What about Mid level commercial shooters, I guess they do with out.
(I'm glad I'm out of that game, I couldn't survive).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
High-end commercial shooters can justify 40K for a camera. Some of the best
gross that much in a couple days of shooting. And Hassy doesn't expect
My guess: full frame and occassionally rent a MF digital, or an old
hassy and a phase one digital back (owned or rented)
On 7/10/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about Mid level commercial shooters, I guess they do with out.
(I'm glad I'm out of that game, I couldn't survive).
Mid level commercial photographers do just fine with Canon and Nikon. And if
they get a job that really justifies medium format digital, they can rent
equipment. But a mid level shooter who works for $2000 a day or so generally
doesn't get work that justifies MF expenditure. Some, of course,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mid level commercial photographers do just fine with Canon and Nikon. And if
they get a job that really justifies medium format digital, they can rent
equipment. But a mid level shooter who works for $2000 a day or so generally
doesn't get work that justifies MF
I would think so. But I bet that quite a few wealthy hobbyists buy them as well.
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mid level commercial photographers do just fine with Canon and Nikon. And
if
they get a job
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think so. But I bet that quite a few wealthy hobbyists buy them as
well.
/de-lurk
I have been to several Hasselblad function where we get to test drive new
blads. My experience here in Sydney is that the most common users are
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think so. But I bet that quite a few wealthy hobbyists buy them as
well.
/de-lurk
I have been to several Hasselblad function where we get to test drive new
blads. My experience here in Sydney is that
18 matches
Mail list logo
