Re: OT: Thunderbird oddity?

> On 06 March 2019 at 19:40 Bob Pdml wrote: > > > > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 19:20, John wrote: > > > > On 3/5/2019 16:10:24, mike wilson wrote: > >>> On 05 March 2019 at 21:07 John wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On the message pane for Thunderbird I have several buttons - "Reply List", > >>>

Re: OT: Thunderbird oddity?

On 3/6/2019 1:20 PM, John wrote: On 3/5/2019 16:10:24, mike wilson wrote: Blame Adobe.  It always works for me. What does Adobe have to do with Thunderbird? I blame #45 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from

Re: OT: Thunderbird oddity?

> On 6 Mar 2019, at 19:20, John wrote: > > On 3/5/2019 16:10:24, mike wilson wrote: >>> On 05 March 2019 at 21:07 John wrote: >>> >>> >>> On the message pane for Thunderbird I have several buttons - "Reply List", >>> "Reply", "Forward", "Archive", "Junk" and "Delete". But, I've noticed that

Re: OT: Thunderbird oddity?

On 3/5/2019 16:10:24, mike wilson wrote: On 05 March 2019 at 21:07 John wrote: On the message pane for Thunderbird I have several buttons - "Reply List", "Reply", "Forward", "Archive", "Junk" and "Delete". But, I've noticed that whenever there's a message that Thunderbird thinks might be

Re: OT: Thunderbird oddity?

Alt-T will open the Tools menu and you can just hit D to batch delete all the messages Thunderbird has marked as Junk.  Or...if you click on the Junk icon to unmark the message as Junk, then click the Junk icon again it Thunderbird will delete the message. -p On 3/5/2019 3:07 PM, John wrote:

Re: OT: Thunderbird oddity?

It works for me , but I have to open the email first to get those choices... I delete before I open the mail, when I'm looking at the line showing who it is addressed to, who sent, subject ,etc.. ann On 3/5/2019 4:10 PM, mike wilson wrote: On 05 March 2019 at 21:07 John wrote: On the

Re: OT: Thunderbird oddity?

> On 05 March 2019 at 21:07 John wrote: > > > On the message pane for Thunderbird I have several buttons - "Reply List", > "Reply", "Forward", "Archive", "Junk" and "Delete". But, I've noticed that > whenever there's a message that Thunderbird thinks might be junk, the "Junk" > button is no

OT: Thunderbird oddity?

On the message pane for Thunderbird I have several buttons - "Reply List", "Reply", "Forward", "Archive", "Junk" and "Delete". But, I've noticed that whenever there's a message that Thunderbird thinks might be junk, the "Junk" button is no longer there. There's a "Not Junk" button in a pop

Re: OT: Film Oddity

I remembered while cleaning out my inbox. I bought two disposables for a white-water rafting trip on a Saturday. Only had time to shoot with one. The train trip was the next day, Sunday. I used the other disposable for that trip so I could take them both in to be processed on Monday morning.

OT: Film Oddity

"Now all I have to figure out is why the hell was I using a disposable camera and not my regular cameras"? Simple John, you may be "Mothering" your regular camera - please note my stress on "may be". This syndrome afflicts many Photographers who fear scratching / damaging their gear if they take

Re: OT: Film Oddity

Cleaning out my inbox ... I finally figured out why I was using the disposable camera. It was left over from the previous day's white-water rafting trip. Bought 2 but only had time to use 1. So I used the second one for the next day's train trip. On 6/23/2016 11:07 AM, John wrote: I just

Re: OT: Film Oddity

So my opinion of the camera when released has been vindicated by someone else' experience. It's always nice to have your gut reaction, with no data at all, turn out to be true. It's too bad, it looked like it should be a nice camera. It had the same autofocus module as the *ist-D, better

Re: OT: Film Oddity

The *ist just advances the film one frame at at time and rewinds at the end of the roll. I bought 3 of them in the past few years. With the battery grip it was a nice sized camera, compact but not too small,. The AF was pretty good (though focus points were clustered way too tightly). It is

Re: OT: Film Oddity

I think the film *ist did that too, but I never wanted to own one, so I don't actually know. On 6/23/2016 3:11 PM, Mark C wrote: I don't think that was too uncommon. Some P cameras would pull all of the film out of the casset and then respoll it as it was shot. On the plus side - if the

Re: OT: Film Oddity

I don't think that was too uncommon. Some P cameras would pull all of the film out of the casset and then respoll it as it was shot. On the plus side - if the camera was accidently opened the exposed frames would not be damaged. On 6/23/2016 12:45 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: My little Yashica

Re: OT: Film Oddity

My little Yashica did the same thing. Regards, Bob S. On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:07 AM, John wrote: > I just noticed that the way those disposable plastic cameras work is > they have the film pulled all the way out of the cassette and as you > take pictures, the film is

OT: Film Oddity

I just noticed that the way those disposable plastic cameras work is they have the film pulled all the way out of the cassette and as you take pictures, the film is rewound into the cassette. All of the frame numbers come out back-to-front (i.e. #1 is the last photo & #27 is the first). It makes

Re: OT: An oddity

On 22/09/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: Cotty's back in the USA. Brooks you better watch your back boy! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: OT: An oddity

I can barely see my front, thank you.:-) Dave On 9/23/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22/09/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: Cotty's back in the USA. Brooks you better watch your back boy! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places,

Re: OT: An oddity

On 9/20/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run a photo mini-lab. I've mentioned that before. I had a customer come in yesterday, wanting re-prints from some negatives. They'd been processed by another store in our chain, and she had the index print. I wrote down the frame numbers

Re: OT: An oddity

From: Paul Stenquist Are you sure it's not 126 film? Paul It had the regular 2:3 ratio frames and sprocket holes on both edges like 35mm film. Base + Fog was a little thin looking, but that may have been because I'm so used to all the edge print, and don't remember ever seeing a

Re: OT: An oddity

On Sep 20, 2007, at 21:31, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Seattle Film Works sold respooled movie film. It wasn't horrible but it also wasn't C41 process or intended for standard photofinishers' use. It was designed for printing onto movie stock for a positive and no one had the setups for it.

Re: OT: An oddity

From: Godfrey DiGiorgi Seattle Film Works sold respooled movie film. It wasn't horrible but it also wasn't C41 process or intended for standard photofinishers' use. It was designed for printing onto movie stock for a positive and no one had the setups for it. I don't know what John's

Re: OT: An oddity

There was a place in Hollywood called RGB that rewound several movie stocks for still camera use. They would process it both as a film positive and as prints. When I shot stills for a production company they asked me to use movie stock for some of them and hooked me up with RGB. It was good

Re: OT: An oddity

On Sep 21, 2007, at 8:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was a place in Hollywood called RGB that rewound several movie stocks for still camera use. They would process it both as a film positive and as prints. That's the place! I have more than a few RGB boxes of slides in my drawer.

Re: OT: An oddity

There was a place in Hollywood called RGB that rewound several movie stocks for still camera use. They would process it both as a film positive and as prints. That's the place! I have more than a few RGB boxes of slides in my drawer. And I got prints, too (which seemed the best

Re: OT: An oddity

Scott Loveless wrote: More than likely it's Chinese made film bought at a drug store or supermarket. They all carry it around here, and every chain has their own name on it. I vote with Scott. I *think* I've seen film like this a few years ago at the photo shop, but we saw a lot of weird

Re: OT: An oddity

From: Axel Belinfante There was a place in Hollywood called RGB that rewound several movie stocks for still camera use. They would process it both as a film positive and as prints. That's the place! I have more than a few RGB boxes of slides in my drawer. And I got prints,

Re: OT: An oddity

Exactly. Cross processing is an entirely different animal. In modern times, some of the movie film stocks were designed to be transfered to digital video -- scanned if you will. So they scan rather nicely one frame at a time for the still photographer. Paul On Sep 21, 2007, at 8:21 PM, John

Re: OT: An oddity

On 21/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run a photo mini-lab. I've mentioned that before. I had a customer come in yesterday, wanting re-prints from some negatives. They'd been processed by another store in our chain, and she had the index print. I wrote down the frame numbers

OT: An oddity

I run a photo mini-lab. I've mentioned that before. I had a customer come in yesterday, wanting re-prints from some negatives. They'd been processed by another store in our chain, and she had the index print. I wrote down the frame numbers from the index print and how many of each she wanted

Re: OT: An oddity

--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run a photo mini-lab. I've mentioned that before. I had a customer come in yesterday, wanting re-prints from some negatives. They'd been processed by another store in our chain,

Re: OT: An oddity

Are you sure it's not 126 film? Paul On Sep 20, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: On 21/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run a photo mini-lab. I've mentioned that before. I had a customer come in yesterday, wanting re-prints from some negatives. They'd been

Re: OT: An oddity

If I remember, Seattle Film Works used to sell film occasionally without edge numbering. But I think it was a glitch. It was terrible film, I shot four rolls of it in Washington State back in 1990. Just awful color. Otherwise, no, never seen that before with any maker, Kodak, Fuji, Agfa, or

Re: OT: An oddity

126 film was pre-masked just like 110. G On Sep 20, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: Are you sure it's not 126 film? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT: An oddity

Seattle Film Works sold respooled movie film. It wasn't horrible but it also wasn't C41 process or intended for standard photofinishers' use. It was designed for printing onto movie stock for a positive and no one had the setups for it. I don't know what John's customer had, but I'd just

Re: OT: An oddity

126 film has frame numbers and an index hole, though no sprocket holes... Paul Stenquist wrote: Are you sure it's not 126 film? Paul On Sep 20, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: On 21/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run a photo mini-lab. I've

Re: OT: An oddity

I think 35mm movie film uses a different process. I have heard about some Chinese film that doesn't have frame numbers. Never seen it though. Digital Image Studio wrote: On 21/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run a photo mini-lab. I've mentioned that before. I had a

Re: OT: An oddity

Digital Image Studio wrote: On 21/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run a photo mini-lab. I've mentioned that before. I had a customer come in yesterday, wanting re-prints from some negatives. They'd been processed by another store in our chain, and she had the index print. I

Re: OT: An oddity

Seattle Film Works, Dale Labs and others were re-spooling EastmanColor 5254 and 5247 movie stock. It has a black anti-halation coating that is removed as part of the developing process. If you run it through a mini-lab it will ruin the chemistry, gunk up the rollers and probably ruin any

Re: OT: PayPal oddity - need advise

John Mustarde wrote: (snip) I envision a time when PayPal and Ebay become so onerous and expensive to use that they destroy their original core business - individuals buying and selling their own stuff. It's happening somewhat now - the number of bargains from individual sellers is way

OT: PayPal oddity - need advise

Hi! I am getting enabled with Vivitar 2x macro converter. I was going to pay to the kind enabler with my PayPal and twice the darn thing rejected my payment. It wrote a big red-lettered message on the top of the screen saying that my credit card has been disabled/cancelled by the credit

Re: OT: PayPal oddity - need advise

In a message dated 4/18/2004 12:52:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My question - is it a mere glitch, or am I in trouble? Anyone had similar experience? Thanks in advance. Boris -- Are you positive the seller isn't denying your payment? I.E. Not accepting

Re: OT: PayPal oddity - need advise

Hi! Are you positive the seller isn't denying your payment? I.E. Not accepting it? Some people will not do international shipping (on ebay) and so have PayPal automatically set to deny payment from certain countries (well, most countries outside the US). You should double-check that with the

Re: OT: PayPal oddity - need advise

In a message dated 4/18/2004 2:44:23 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marnie, enabler gave me their e-mail address which is registered with PayPal and explicitly agreed to make a deal with me. The problem occured when I hit confirm button in order to complete PayPal

Re: OT: PayPal oddity - need advise

It's a glitch. Probably at the credit card company. If their computer was down or hiccuping, Paypal would not have been able to get approval and would have posted the automatic card is invalid message. It happened to me once as well. Don't worry about it. Paul On Apr 18, 2004, at 3:43 AM,

Re: OT: PayPal oddity - need advise

My question - is it a mere glitch, or am I in trouble? Anyone had similar experience? Boris Worse than that. I cannot use paypal anymore with any Visa card as, six weeks ago, Visa cancelled one of my two cards. Visa did it because that card's magnetic code had been cloned while I was

Re: OT: PayPal oddity - need advise

On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:43:02 +0400, you wrote: My question - is it a mere glitch, or am I in trouble? Anyone had similar experience? Thanks in advance. Boris PayPal and Ebay are in business to maximize their profits and close off all loopholes that might cause losses. Never forget. They are