The ISO 800 and 1600 ones look worse than the 10D or *istD samples at
those ISOs I've seen. But they are different samples, so its unfair to
compare.
Alan Chan wrote:
Here are some SD10 samples I think are pretty good.
http://www.pbase.com/rickdecker
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0310/03102704sigmasd10.asp
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
Basically it's the same 3.3 MPixel with improved sensitivity and
dynamic range. And they reverted to microlenses in order to
achieve it. Maybe Kodak will do the same with their 14MP CMOS and
its catastrophic noise above 400 ASA. Too bad, I was hoping the
industry managed to overcome
PROTECTED]
To: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Sigma SD10, preview and samples
Basically it's the same 3.3 MPixel with improved sensitivity and
dynamic range. And they reverted to microlenses in order to
achieve it. Maybe Kodak will do
/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
See New Pages The Cement Company from HELL!
Updated: August 15, 2003
- Original Message -
From: Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Sigma SD10, preview
Here are some SD10 samples I think are pretty good.
http://www.pbase.com/rickdecker
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Full review on imaging resource:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/SSD10/SD10A.HTM
-Original Message-
From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 October 2003 09:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Sigma SD10, preview and samples
Here are some SD10 samples I
10.2 MPixels...
i am wondering how long before their marketoids start
calling it 40.8 MPixels (after all, one *could*
interpolate around the pixels oh wait, why stop at
40.8? let's call it 160!)
sheesh...
mishka
Initially Foveon specified 3.3 MPix in the marketing papers. Later,
although it was obvious it delivered results at least as good as
6 MPix mosaic sensors, it was still classified among 3 MPix cameras
in commercial catalogues, tutorials, even reviews.
So it's the market and it's MPix
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Alin Flaider wrote:
Initially Foveon specified 3.3 MPix in the marketing papers. Later,
although it was obvious it delivered results at least as good as
6 MPix mosaic sensors, it was still classified among 3 MPix cameras
in commercial catalogues, tutorials, even
10 matches
Mail list logo
