I'd love to see them. My daughter is on the synchronized skating team at
Michigan State.
Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My daughter is on a synchronized skating team and I have great fun using
photoshop to create types of collages for the team's website. I take about a
half dozen
gfrn and vic typed
Begin Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:38:16 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: sliding away?
In a message dated 11/11/02 10:05:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've never bother to do anything of note in it, until
In a message dated 11/11/02 8:13:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LIke what? I'm curious what I should continue to teach myself.
Try working with Layers to create soft focus effects on a picture that was
never taken that way. Try combining one image with another to create a whole
new
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:05:35 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: sliding away?
In a message dated 11/11/02 8:13:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LIke what? I'm curious what I should continue to teach myself.
Try working with Layers to create soft focus effects on a picture
In a message dated 11/12/02 12:15:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good tips Vic.
I hope to have the time this winter to work not
only on PS skills but scanning epson 2450 skills.
Now if we could only get Mel Lastman' snow to
close the city like in 1999,it would help to get my
but off the
To me, the most valuable features of PhotoShop are those that allow fine
tuning of a scan for printing. I usually begin by setting the Levels.
I set RGB level in respect to the histogram but frequently set the color
levels by eye. Hue and Saturation is next. I'll adjust the overall
colorcast a bit
My daughter is on a synchronized skating team and I have great fun using
photoshop to create types of collages for the team's website. I take about a
half dozen photos of the team, individuals whatever and create an 8X10. Some
of the images are close cropped, others have shadows etc etc. They
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Keith Whaley wrote:
And, for the 1/10th of 1% that you actually use and enjoy, you're
going thru all that sweat and tears?
Nah, not me, thanks...
I'm a longstanding computer geek, and every computer I've owned for the
last 10 years or so has had a copy of Photoshop on
Your comments understood and agreed with...
That's about what I'd need/want to do, as well.
Other comments within the text below...
gfen wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Keith Whaley wrote:
And, for the 1/10th of 1% that you actually use and enjoy, you're
going thru all that sweat and tears?
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Keith Whaley wrote:
How did it GET There?
-cough- That would be TELLING.
Anyways, I was a 13 year old geek when I got my first PC (from a trash bin
in the very industrial park I now work), before that I had my share of
PCs.
At the time, we all pirated software to our
11, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: OT: sliding away?
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Keith Whaley wrote:
And, for the 1/10th of 1% that you actually use and enjoy, you're
going thru all that sweat and tears?
Nah, not me, thanks...
I'm a longstanding computer geek, and every computer I've owned
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Keith Whaley wrote:
Huh? [C]loning to spot is outside my understanding. Please elucidate!
Using the clone tool to spot your prints for dust, hair, fingerprints,
etc. To say nothing of the ability to use the clone tool to remove power
lines, facial blemishes, your
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 10:42 AM, gfen wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Keith Whaley wrote:
Huh? [C]loning to spot is outside my understanding. Please
elucidate!
Using the clone tool to spot your prints for dust, hair,
fingerprints,
etc. To say nothing of the ability to use the clone
Aha! I'd like that, I just intuit! g
Thanks for the explanation.
keith
gfen wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Keith Whaley wrote:
Huh? [C]loning to spot is outside my understanding. Please elucidate!
Using the clone tool to spot your prints for dust, hair, fingerprints,
etc. To say nothing
Guys if you have limited experience with photoshop, I highly recommend
photodeluxe which is also made by adobe and comes free with many decent Epson
printers and various scanners. It really is simple to use and guides you
through most steps with ease. It can do most of what photoshop can do
In a message dated 11/11/02 10:05:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've never bother to do anything of note in it, until recently.. The last
few times I've turned the PC on, I've learned how to use curves and levels
to make a nicer looking image, and how to clone out dust. Then I learned
how to
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You really should do yourself a favour and learn to do more with
photoshop.
It is an incredible tool. In fact, I would say it is one of my most
valuable
pieces of photographic equipment I have.I spend a lot of time just playing
with it and
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guys if you have limited experience with photoshop, I highly recommend
photodeluxe which is also made by adobe and comes free with many decent
Epson
printers and various scanners. It really is simple to use and guides you
through most steps
: Saturday, November 09, 2002 4:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: sliding away?
...
I have yet to find a suitable printer, who will print what I see when
I take the shot.
I get prints back from the printer, look at the prints, then glass the
negatives and see _far_ more detail than
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which means I would need to buy a film scanner.
I have a document scanner that does top quality documents, but I don't
think it's optimized for film... I'll have to check my manual carefully.
I know I'd be very unhappy with it if it were only
Hi Dan, a couple of comments below...
Dan Scott wrote:
On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 07:28 AM, Herb Chong wrote:
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which means I would need to buy a film scanner.
I have a document scanner that does top quality documents, but I don't
I agree with Herb that the color management in Photoshop is very important
to getting good and consistent results. An added advantage is that there is
a lot of good training books and videos. I would go with Photoshop Elements
(their lite version about $100 US) most of what you need will be there,
On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Hi Dan, a couple of comments below...
Have you ever down-loaded and reviewed the 237 page instruction manual
that comes with it? Most impressive ~ and I'm talking about image
manipulation!
Which app are we talking about here,
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Learning to print your own is certainly a giant step forward when it comes
to
prints from slides. They may not me perfect but they are pretty darn close.
Vic
i scan and print digitally. best possible results for the least hassle. not
cheap
Keith,
Your welcome to try my lab. The owner has offered a free 11X14 or
8X10 for the cost of shipping to PDML members that want to see what it
can do. They use Agfa D-Labs.
That being said, one thing to keep in mind is that the paper has less
latitude than the film does. So you are always in
If you are doing a few prints, that may be a reasonable route. But if
you are doing lots and lots of them, time and money soon become
factors.
Bruce
Saturday, November 9, 2002, 5:05:38 AM, you wrote:
Pac In a message dated 11/9/02 7:50:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pac i think you are
I bought a roll of slide film the other day...never done that before. It
was just hanging there next to the rest of the film looking lonely. I had
to save it.
I've not finished the roll in either camera yet so I guess it's going to
have to wait a few days. Wonder how I'll get it developed.
Cory,
The most frustrating thing about slides is trying to get great prints
at a reasonable price from them. You look at the slide and go WOW!
Then you try to get a print made and get disappointed, or you pay a
princely sum. About the only really good way to do it is to have a
good scanner for
28 matches
Mail list logo
