Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-09 Thread mike wilson
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007/01/08 Mon PM 11:19:44 GMT To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated) keith_w wrote: Adam Maas wrote: [...] The s is correct, z is

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-09 Thread Bob Shell
On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:02 PM, SJ wrote: like adam said, 'z' is the american usage... But we don't advertize that fact. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-09 Thread Christian
keith_w wrote: On the other hand, you say, Correct Canadian usage is UK English... Do you know who made that so? Is the Queen on their money? There's your answer. :-) -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-09 Thread Thibouille
I think those are nice example but they do not generate any buzz in my brain. Variations like Elevator/Lift are more notable and Through / Thru is like touching Reset button of my computer. Same with Night/Nite ... I feel like those american spellings jumping into my eyes and making fun of me ;)

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-09 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Neither nite nor thru are correct for formal prose use. They're alternative spellings based on US English sound correlates, usually used for signage contraction, to save space and/or draw attention *because* they are 'wrong' and thus acceptable because they get the message across. Godfrey

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-09 Thread ann sanfedele
Well, in the American dictionary we use as the official source for Scrabble play, both night/nite color/colour realize/realise are good - though the s version is considered British as is the our ending . But night/nite is just a modern cutseyism(I just invented this word) We get a lot of

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-09 Thread John Francis
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:07:41PM +0100, Thibouille wrote: I think those are nice example but they do not generate any buzz in my brain. Variations like Elevator/Lift are more notable and Through / Thru is like touching Reset button of my computer. Same with Night/Nite ... I feel like those

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-09 Thread P. J. Alling
Neither Thru nor Nite is correct in any variation of English, I know of. Thibouille wrote: I think those are nice example but they do not generate any buzz in my brain. Variations like Elevator/Lift are more notable and Through / Thru is like touching Reset button of my computer. Same with

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-09 Thread Don Williams
Despite the grating 'gotten' is okay. Look it up in your Oxford. Another one that's interesting is plow, that, in UK English is plough. Plow is older and closer to the original than plough. Don John Francis wrote: On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:07:41PM +0100, Thibouille wrote: I think those

OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread K.Takeshita
On 1/08/07 4:19 PM, Bob W, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: moaning or apologising This is not to pick out Bob :-). I am increasing seeing certain words spelt in a different way than (I thought) I learned in school, and was thinking about asking somebody about it. Suddenly, I thought why don't I ask

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Scott Loveless
On 1/8/07, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/08/07 4:19 PM, Bob W, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: moaning or apologising This is not to pick out Bob :-). I am increasing seeing certain words spelt in a different way than (I thought) I learned in school, and was thinking about asking

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Adam Maas
K.Takeshita wrote: On 1/08/07 4:19 PM, Bob W, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: moaning or apologising This is not to pick out Bob :-). I am increasing seeing certain words spelt in a different way than (I thought) I learned in school, and was thinking about asking somebody about it. Suddenly, I

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread K.Takeshita
On 1/08/07 4:56 PM, Adam Maas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The s is correct, z is american usage (Sadly common in Canada as the schools teach correct english less and less). Thanks Adam. One more person to confirm this? I learned English in Japan, where they taught U.K. English in school at

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread K.Takeshita
On 1/08/07 5:01 PM, Scott Loveless, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apologize, etc., is the U.S. spelling. Apologise, etc., is an incorrect spelling used by the rest of the English speaking world. HTH. ;-) Thanks, Scott and Bob. Now I've got it. Perhaps I will use these spellings case by case.

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread P. J. Alling
The conquest of Canada slowly proceeds. Adam Maas wrote: K.Takeshita wrote: On 1/08/07 4:19 PM, Bob W, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: moaning or apologising This is not to pick out Bob :-). I am increasing seeing certain words spelt in a different way than (I thought) I learned

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Cotty
On 8/1/07, K.Takeshita, discombobulated, unleashed: Apologize Sympathize Realize Recognize And so on, while people use Apologise Sympathise Realise Recognise If it has a 'Z' in it, it was written by someone who likely paints a flag on their fence :-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O)

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread K.Takeshita
On 1/08/07 5:44 PM, Cotty, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it has a 'Z' in it, it was written by someone who likely paints a flag on their fence :-) LOL :-)) Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread keith_w
Adam Maas wrote: [...] The s is correct, z is american usage (Sadly common in Canada as the schools teach correct english less and less). -Adam Oh? [C]orrect English, you say? H. keith whaley -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread David J Brooks
Your asking ME. You must not read my posts Ken. LOL Dave Quoting K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 1/08/07 4:19 PM, Bob W, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: moaning or apologising This is not to pick out Bob :-). I am increasing seeing certain words spelt in a different way than (I thought) I

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Adam Maas
keith_w wrote: Adam Maas wrote: [...] The s is correct, z is american usage (Sadly common in Canada as the schools teach correct english less and less). -Adam Oh? [C]orrect English, you say? H. keith whaley Yes, as defined by the OED, not by Websters. Correct Canadian

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Doug Franklin
K.Takeshita wrote: But if S is correct, then I have to mind to switch to S. Both are correct, though the folks that use the other way are likely to look at you funny if you spell it one way. -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Adam Maas wrote: The s is correct, z is american usage (Sadly common in Canada as the schools teach correct english less and less). Not sure what correct means in this case. I am lead to believe that the American spelling is closer to the original spelling of the words.

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread K.Takeshita
On 1/08/07 6:21 PM, Doug Franklin, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But if S is correct, then I have to mind to switch to S. Both are correct, though the folks that use the other way are likely to look at you funny if you spell it one way. Actually, this was what concerned me. I have no problem

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Doug Franklin
K.Takeshita wrote: I certainly wish to use correct spelling but this is probably not a matter of correctness per se. On the Internet, there's not any correct spelling for stuff like s vs z, -or vs -our, etc. :-) Pretty true, though, in an international venue like this. Use whatever you're

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread keith_w
Adam Maas wrote: keith_w wrote: Adam Maas wrote: [...] The s is correct, z is american usage (Sadly common in Canada as the schools teach correct english less and less). -Adam Oh? [C]orrect English, you say? H. keith whaley Yes, as defined by the OED, not by Websters.

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread SJ
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:06:02 -0500 K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/08/07 4:56 PM, Adam Maas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The s is correct, z is american usage (Sadly common in Canada as the schools teach correct english less and less). Thanks Adam. One more person to confirm

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Stan Halpin
Some time ago, (late 1800's?) there was a spelling reform movement in the U.K. Strangely, they got rid of the z's, but kept the ou's (as in colour, honour, ...). In the U.S. such reforms never have a chance because nobody knows how to spell in the first place. Stan On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:06 PM,

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread ann sanfedele
The z is USA , the s is used by the Brits ann (the Scrabble player, remember? ) K.Takeshita wrote: On 1/08/07 4:19 PM, Bob W, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: moaning or apologising This is not to pick out Bob :-). I am increasing seeing certain words spelt in a different way than (I

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread K.Takeshita
On 1/08/07 10:30 PM, ann sanfedele, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The z is USA , the s is used by the Brits ann (the Scrabble player, remember? ) Must be right! Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread graywolf
Hey! We invented the dictionary. That insured that we had a standardized way to misspell the words. Stan Halpin wrote: Some time ago, (late 1800's?) there was a spelling reform movement in the U.K. Strangely, they got rid of the z's, but kept the ou's (as in colour, honour, ...). In the

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really that complicated)

2007-01-08 Thread David Mann
On Jan 9, 2007, at 4:30 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: The z is USA , the s is used by the Brits ann (the Scrabble player, remember? ) Lucky sods... you get to use the 10-point letter :) As far as I'm concerned, a word is legal if you can make up a plausible-sounding definition. - Dave --