Am 07.02.19 um 02:28 schrieb Mark Roberts:
Oh yeah. The K-10D had a nice "look" to its images.
...and its RAW files needed much less work to get the colours right than
any Pentax DSLR that came after it.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog :
Den 08.02.2019 19:53, skrev P. J. Alling:
I never really thought the K10D sensor was mush...
It needed room though.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Wasn't it a good lead dog?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 8:53 AM P. J. Alling
wrote:
> I never really thought the K10D sensor was mush...
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
I never really thought the K10D sensor was mush...
On 2/6/2019 8:28 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Jostein Øksne wrote:
The istD is still a good camera. Software has come a long way in fifteen years.
The camera I miss the most is actually the K10D. It had very special raw files,
with its sensor
thanks Ann and Jack
Henk
Op 2019-02-07 om 14:23 schreef ann sanfedele:
those are lovely, Henk great geology :-)
ann
On 2/7/2019 2:51 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
Beautiful landscape of Wales.
The *istD was indeed a nice little camera.
I had this same idea a few weeks ago to reprocess in LR some
those are lovely, Henk great geology :-)
ann
On 2/7/2019 2:51 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
Beautiful landscape of Wales.
The *istD was indeed a nice little camera.
I had this same idea a few weeks ago to reprocess in LR some of of my
old RAW pictures taken with the *istD on my trip to Australia in
Nice light, well composed, Henk.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 6, 2019, at 11:51 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:
>
> Beautiful landscape of Wales.
> The *istD was indeed a nice little camera.
> I had this same idea a few weeks ago to reprocess in LR some of of my old RAW
> pictures taken with the
Beautiful landscape of Wales.
The *istD was indeed a nice little camera.
I had this same idea a few weeks ago to reprocess in LR some of of my
old RAW pictures taken with the *istD on my trip to Australia in 2006.
Here are a few of the Great Ocean Road.
MARK, MARK !
ann
On 2/6/2019 8:28 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
When the light is good most of the job is taken care of for you no matter
what camera/sensor you're
using.
--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
I thought maybe you had posted the jpeg someplace
On February 6, 2019 7:22:24 PM PST, Mark Roberts
wrote:
>l...@red4est.com wrote:
>
>>As has been noted that's a very nice photo. By any chance is the
>original processing of it available? It would be interesting to
>compare.
>
>I'm afraid not.
l...@red4est.com wrote:
>As has been noted that's a very nice photo. By any chance is the original
>processing of it available? It would be interesting to compare.
I'm afraid not. It was done in a much earlier version of Lightroom
(this is all Lightropom processing, no Photoshop) and I don't
As has been noted that's a very nice photo. By any chance is the original
processing of it available? It would be interesting to compare.
On February 6, 2019 5:28:38 PM PST, Mark Roberts
wrote:
>Jostein Øksne wrote:
>
>>The istD is still a good camera. Software has come a long way in
>fifteen
Jostein Øksne wrote:
>The istD is still a good camera. Software has come a long way in fifteen years.
>The camera I miss the most is actually the K10D. It had very special raw
>files, with its sensor oversampling technique.
Oh yeah. The K-10D had a nice "look" to its images. Not nearly as mush
Excellent image! I love how you caught the color changes caused by the
distance of the various hills from your camera.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:16 AM Postmaster
wrote:
> Yet another reason to always shoot raw: Some of those old
Very pretty -- agree with Jostein - and I can't imagine not shooting
raw... I would still ahve my ISTD if I had not needed more range for a
specific shoot and I got a new camera as pay for work.
ann
On 2/6/2019 3:36 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
The istD is still a good camera. Software has come
On 6/2/19, Postmaster, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Yet another reason to always shoot raw: Some of those old files are
>much better than you thought. Here's an oldie from 2005.
>
>https://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d500929.jpg
>Pen-y-pass, Llanberis, Wales. This was taken as we were finishing our
Nice. That valley deserves a good bicycling.
> On 6 Feb 2019, at 20:16, Postmaster wrote:
>
> Yet another reason to always shoot raw: Some of those old files are
> much better than you thought. Here's an oldie from 2005.
>
> https://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d500929.jpg
> Pen-y-pass,
The istD is still a good camera. Software has come a long way in fifteen years.
The camera I miss the most is actually the K10D. It had very special raw files,
with its sensor oversampling technique.
It's a nice image too, Mark. Love the play of sunlight and shadow across the
landscape.
Yet another reason to always shoot raw: Some of those old files are
much better than you thought. Here's an oldie from 2005.
https://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d500929.jpg
Pen-y-pass, Llanberis, Wales. This was taken as we were finishing our
Snowdon hike.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography &
19 matches
Mail list logo
