On Dec 21, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Tom C wrote:
I didn't care for the first one you showed us, but I quite like #'s
210 and 105. 210 is kind of disorienting and I really like the
composition of 105. Being fascinated with caves in general, they
make my mind race...
Thanks for commenting. They
Dave,
I didn't care for the first one you showed us, but I quite like #'s 210 and
105. 210 is kind of disorienting and I really like the composition of 105.
Being fascinated with caves in general, they make my mind race...
Tom C.
BTW I processed the other shots last night and put up a sm
In a message dated 12/13/2005 7:35:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the info. Rocks can be quite fascinating... I'm not
exactly fond of earthquakes but it seems we're somewhat overdue for a
decent-sized one. We went and built our capital city right on top of
In a message dated 12/12/2005 1:46:51 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's about time I posted another pic... I have several versions of
this one; this is just the first I came to when scanning. The others
are on the next row which I'll process at a future date :)
I've p
Thts right. New Zealand is on shaky ground. If I would live there I 'd
check out that my hose is safe and sound. Otherwise so called
retrofitting is needed. I agree with you Wellington is a nice place. I
believe that New Zealand engineers are up to world standrds when it
comes into constructing
Thanks for the info. Rocks can be quite fascinating... I'm not
exactly fond of earthquakes but it seems we're somewhat overdue for a
decent-sized one. We went and built our capital city right on top of
a large fault line... I really like the city but I wouldn't want to
live there.
BTW I
HI,
The texture isnt cracks - thats correct. I once upon a time was a
geologist before rurning into earthquakes. The tecture of rock e.g.
limestone, is due to - 1. The deposits (coral reef or whatever was the
basis for the limestone) are layered and when squeezed deeper into the
Earth they ap
Hi,
I actually think it gies some extra depth to a picture when small river
rocks are sharp. I howver liked the framing better of your first picture.
Cheers,
Ronald
David Mann wrote:
On Dec 13, 2005, at 6:56 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
What bothers me:
Just doesn't appear sharp - the walls l
Thanks David,
I might visit the place on my next trip to South island,
Cheers,
Ronald
David Mann wrote:
On Dec 12, 2005, at 11:28 PM, Ronald Arvidsson wrote:
Wonderful picture. You really got the rocks right. Is it some kind
of limestone?
Yes, it's limestone. The river has been gradua
On Dec 13, 2005, at 6:56 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
What bothers me:
Just doesn't appear sharp - the walls look very detailed, but soft and
the stream rocks likewise - perhaps just need sharpening
The walls were probably quite soft anyway... limestone is a bit like
that and the texture isn't cr
On Dec 13, 2005, at 3:02 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Dave my only nit with this is that I prefer the black hole be lower
in the frame. drawing the viewer in more than as you have it
I have one with the hole lower. It's in the batch I'll hopefully be
processing tonight. I think the hole is t
On Dec 12, 2005, at 11:28 PM, Ronald Arvidsson wrote:
Wonderful picture. You really got the rocks right. Is it some kind
of limestone?
Yes, it's limestone. The river has been gradually carving its way
through for thousands of years.
Where in Canterbury is it?
It's about halfway betwee
Hello David,
I've looked at this a couple of times now. My feelings are mixed
about it. What I like:
Unusual natural phenomenon
Unusual water color
Composition
What bothers me:
Just doesn't appear sharp - the walls look very detailed, but soft and
the stream rocks likewise - perhaps just need s
I like it. Neat subject and great depth.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "David Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?p=154&t=1
Dave my only nit with this is that I prefer the black hole be lower in the
frame. drawing the viewer in more than as you have it
Was this a color capture?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAW - "Cave Stream"
It'
On 12/12/05, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's about time I posted another pic... I have several versions of
> this one; this is just the first I came to when scanning. The others
> are on the next row which I'll process at a future date :)
>
> I've put in a fair bit of work trying to
r 2005 10:45
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: PAW - "Cave Stream"
>
> It's about time I posted another pic... I have several versions of
> this one; this is just the first I came to when scanning. The others
> are on the next row which I'll process at
Hi David,
Wonderful picture. You really got the rocks right. Is it some kind of
limestone?
Where in Canterbury is it? I've been to NZ some four times and plan to
go there again withthe family. We went together there and they were so
taken that they just wanted to go back. Its a lovely place wi
It's about time I posted another pic... I have several versions of
this one; this is just the first I came to when scanning. The others
are on the next row which I'll process at a future date :)
I've put in a fair bit of work trying to maintain some detail inside
the big hole... you may n
Hi!
David, being not a cave wonderer myself, I rather am frightened by the
view. I really like the way the smooth waves lead to the black hole of
the cave...
Thumbs up!
Boris
Actually it's nicely composed, not particularly boring. I like it.
David Mann wrote:
Just a boring landscape, but it's on time this week :)
Sorry if the colours look a little off... I scanned with the wrong
film profile and tried correcting it by eye.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/pa
Just a boring landscape, but it's on time this week :)
Sorry if the colours look a little off... I scanned with the wrong film
profile and tried correcting it by eye.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=13-Mar-2004
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
22 matches
Mail list logo
