Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:41 AM
Subject: PESO - Squatter's Rights
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13275436size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13275436size=lg
:-)
Gave me a smile on a day on which I needed one.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I've thought about getting of photo.net, but I have a couple thousand pics
there. If I did leave, I'd go to smugmug.
Paul
On Jun 9, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
Lovely picture, very strong.
You might want to consider migrating off photo.net, its pages look
kind of dingy these days
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13275436size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
You guys living under a bridge now? ;)) Super cute with a playful air.
Jack
--- On Wed, 6/8/11, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: PESO - Squatter's Rights
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, June 8
:
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: PESO - Squatter's Rights
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011, 9:41 AM
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13275436size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: PESO - Squatter's Rights
You guys living under a bridge now? ;)) Super cute with a playful air.
As a matter of fact all of us (Michiganders
Paul,
Love the pose looking over her shoulder and the composition.
Blows the 'rule of thirds' up completely.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13275436size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I don't remember bridge trolls being that cute.
--Original Message--
From: Paul Stenquist
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Squatter's Rights
Sent: Jun 8, 2011 12:41 PM
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id
On 8/6/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13275436size=lg
That's fab.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Thanks Cotty. I was looking for different way to frame a kid pic. BTW, it's
not a bridge, Grace is perched on the base of a monument in a Michigan park.
Paul
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 8/6/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Lovely picture, very strong.
You might want to consider migrating off photo.net, its pages look
kind of dingy these days and the ads seem really obtrusive. But maybe
that's just me. -T
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On 6/5/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is probably a really nice photo, but I can only
see 1/4 of it on my monitor at a time--and it's not
worth copying it to Photoshop and reducing its size.
Rick, I can't remember, are you on a Mac? What I do is simply drag and
drop the image
On May 6, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Bob,
This is probably a really nice photo, but I can only
see 1/4 of it on my monitor at a time--and it's not
worth copying it to Photoshop and reducing its size.
How about keeping things to 600 pixels or less
vertically, please?
Don't know
I have an iMac and a MacBook at home, and a PC at
work. That dodge may work, but it's a lot easier if
the person posting keeps the size down.
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/5/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is probably a really nice photo, but I can
only
see 1/4
Rob,
You're right, this was discussed a month or two ago,
and in a poll the overwhelming majority of respondents
said they wouldn't bother to resize a pic in order to
view it, IIRC.
FWIW, I'm using Safari on a Mac.
Rick
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/05/07, Rick
for the input. I have replaced the
original with a smaller
version.
Cheers,
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: Peso Squatter's Rights
Bob,
This is probably
On 07/05/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob,
You're right, this was discussed a month or two ago,
and in a poll the overwhelming majority of respondents
said they wouldn't bother to resize a pic in order to
view it, IIRC.
That's a pity then.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
On 5/6/07, Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My wife and I spent the morning at Maitland Bay. On the path going down
to the ocean, I spotted this Red Gum perched on a rock. The title is the
first thing that popped into my head.
Comments always welcomed (well - mostly)
600 pixels is too small. This is a photography list, and most viewers want to
be able to judge image quality. Even at 1200 pixels that can be difficult. At
600 it's impossible.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob,
You're right,
Personally, I prefer a browser sized image to start with and the
option of viewing a larger image. But that's not a always possible.
Firefox, and I'm assuming other browsers, offers a setting to
automatically resize the image. This particular image needs to be big,
IMO. There's a lot of
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Peso Squatter's Rights
600 pixels is too small. This is a photography list, and most viewers want
to be able to judge image quality. Even at 1200 pixels that can be
difficult. At 600 it's impossible.
The 600 pixel
]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Peso Squatter's Rights
600 pixels is too small. This is a photography list, and most viewers want
to be able to judge image quality. Even at 1200 pixels that can be
difficult. At 600 it's impossible.
The 600
Rick Womer wrote:
You're right, this was discussed a month or two ago,
and in a poll the overwhelming majority of respondents
said they wouldn't bother to resize a pic in order to
view it, IIRC.
Right. A cardinal rule of web design is that the web site should
accommodate the user, not the other
In a message dated 5/6/2007 4:48:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My wife and I spent the morning at Maitland Bay. On the path going down
to the ocean, I spotted this Red Gum perched on a rock. The title is the
first thing that popped into my head.
Comments always
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Peso Squatter's Rights
I wasn't speaking of the PUG. I think it's fine as is. I was talking about
PESOs and having the option of viewing a larger size. You can always make
an image smaller, but you can't make it larger.
My
In a message dated 5/7/2007 7:18:05 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 600 pixel constraint was put in when monitors were smaller, bandwidth
was expensive, lots of people were on dial-up, and dinosaurs still roamed
the earth.
I can happily view an image of 800
On 08/05/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. A cardinal rule of web design is that the web site should
accommodate the user, not the other way around.
It's easy enough to have the photo link to an extra-large version for
viewers who want to see one (keeps bandwidth costs down,
I agree that the original Squatters Rights was saved far too large.
However, different images require different resolutions.
In the case of the original, a thumbnail would do little justice to the
image. Other subject matter does not loose anything in a smaller format.
Here is a link
In a message dated 5/7/2007 5:55:30 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree that the original Squatters Rights was saved far too large.
However, different images require different resolutions.
In the case of the original, a thumbnail would do little justice to the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's what the clone stamp is for. :-)
Marnie aka Doe
I know! Or I could have moved the darn thing!
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
My wife and I spent the morning at Maitland Bay. On the path going down
to the ocean, I spotted this Red Gum perched on a rock. The title is the
first thing that popped into my head.
Comments always welcomed (well - mostly)
http://www.users.on.net/~bobrapp/Peso/Squatters%20Rights.jpg
Certainly some interesting limb shapes and contours. I'd prefer if they
were more isolated from the overall tangle of the surrounding growth.
Still, I think it was worth a shot.
Jack
--- Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My wife and I spent the morning at Maitland Bay. On the path
going
Nice photo - appropriate title.
Maris
Bob Rapp wrote:
My wife and I spent the morning at Maitland Bay. On the path going
down to the ocean, I spotted this Red Gum perched on a rock. The
title is the first thing that popped into my head.
Comments always welcomed (well - mostly)
Hi Bob
Excellent shot - I love the twisted shapes that these old angophoras can
produce.
Haven't been down the Maitland Bay track for decades - must do it again soon.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Bob Rapp [EMAIL
Bob,
This is probably a really nice photo, but I can only
see 1/4 of it on my monitor at a time--and it's not
worth copying it to Photoshop and reducing its size.
How about keeping things to 600 pixels or less
vertically, please?
Rick
--- Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My wife and I
On 07/05/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
This is probably a really nice photo, but I can only
see 1/4 of it on my monitor at a time--and it's not
worth copying it to Photoshop and reducing its size.
How about keeping things to 600 pixels or less
vertically, please?
Rick,
Hi Rick,
Thanks for the input. I have replaced the original with a smaller
version.
Cheers,
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: Peso Squatter's Rights
Bob
38 matches
Mail list logo
