: Paw: GFM Pic #11. IR #3.The final walk
On 7/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey gang.
IR photo number three. This is the swing bridge. I was trying to do two
things here. Get
some decent
light and not have people on it. One out of two ain't bad i suppose.g
Anyway
Thanks Scott.
Now i have an idea of what things look like in IR at the mountain, i;ll try
somemore next
year.
I would like to take a trip a long the parkway and try some there.
Maybe at the big old house (again i forget the name) were GFM #1 was shot.
Dave
On 7/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey gang.
IR photo number three. This is the swing bridge. I was trying to do two
things here. Get
some decent
light and not have people on it. One out of two ain't bad i suppose.g
Anyway. I looked at this shot a few times
Hey gang.
IR photo number three. This is the swing bridge. I was trying to do two things
here. Get
some decent
light and not have people on it. One out of two ain't bad i suppose.g
Anyway. I looked at this shot a few times and its starting to grow on me. Sort
of looks
like the
final
Dave,
I've looked at it 3 times now - it does grow on you a bit. For me,
what stands out is the IR really gives good visual separation between
the rocks, foliage and bridge. I have some similar shots in regular
color and they just don't look the same. Another thing that comes
across to me is
Hi Bruce.
Thanks for the kind words.
I had a feeling that the contrast would be better for some of the GFM shots,
than my
normal pond
shots, because of the rocks and coniferious trees. They give off a bit of
reflection but
not to
overpowering.
I actually spent some time thinking what they
6 matches
Mail list logo
