<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob Sullivan"
> Subject: Re: Pentax USA upping their game
>
>
> > Good going Pentax! How long have we been talking about this kind of
> > service?
>
> How many people on this list will
Dork doesn't even come close. Ken is a fuckin' jackass.
John
Quoting "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I beg to differ, Kenny Boy is not a Nimrod, he's a Dork.
>
> Mark Erickson wrote:
> > I think it's a Halo Effect thing. Specifically, if Pentax is viewed as a
>
> > viable "Professional
ect: Re: Pentax USA upping their game
>> Good going Pentax! How long have we been talking about this kind of
>> service?
WR> How many people on this list will qualify for it, even if the mothercorp
WR> goes world wide with it?
WR> William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I beg to differ, Kenny Boy is not a Nimrod, he's a Dork.
Mark Erickson wrote:
> I think it's a Halo Effect thing. Specifically, if Pentax is viewed as a
> viable "Professional Solution", the nimrods* of the world won't turn up
> their noses and sniff that Pentax is not a Real Camera like a Niko
I think it's a Halo Effect thing. Specifically, if Pentax is viewed as a
viable "Professional Solution", the nimrods* of the world won't turn up
their noses and sniff that Pentax is not a Real Camera like a Nikon or
Canon. A few of them with more $$$ than sense will buy Pentax cameras.
Penta
Well it's kind of moot in this country, as we have no official Pentax
representation.
Ask a certain east coast .au PDML'er about Pentax support in this
country some time.
Hopefully they do deliver some "Pro" spec'ed equipment sometime soon.
On Feb 1, 2008 9:20 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTE
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
Subject: Re: Pentax USA upping their game
> Good going Pentax! How long have we been talking about this kind of
> service?
How many people on this list will qualify for it, even if the mothercorp
goes world wide with i
I've actually been told by a large "pro" photo shop that the lack of
support was a major problem with Pentax.
I'm glad to read of this image elevating decision!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not the important thing. What is important is that this move
> suggests th
Infinitely more than before it existed.
>
> From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/02/01 Fri AM 11:56:16 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Pentax USA upping their game
>
> But really, how
That's not the important thing. What is important is that this move
suggests that Pentax does plan high end offerings. Whether these be K-
mount or 645 mount remains to be seen. But the pro service will be in
place and operating when the equipment is ready for market. So
service will no long
But really, how many here are actually going to benefit from it?
Cheers,
Dave
On Feb 1, 2008 8:44 PM, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good going Pentax! How long have webeen talking about this kind of service?
> Regards, Bob S.
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2008 11:42 PM, Mark Erickson <[EMAIL PR
Good going Pentax! How long have webeen talking about this kind of service?
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 30, 2008 11:42 PM, Mark Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like they formally introduced the rumored "pro" program.
>
> http://www.pentaximaging.com/footer/news_media_article?ArticleId=105
Looks like they formally introduced the rumored "pro" program.
http://www.pentaximaging.com/footer/news_media_article?ArticleId=10510455
I would guess that they plan to release high-end equipment to back it up
--Mark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
13 matches
Mail list logo
