A friend is looking for decent quality lens with a 300mm tele
capability, at least. This is out of the range of my experience in
Pentax lenses.
Anyone worked with the FA-J75-300? or the Sigma 135-400? I know the
Sigma 50-500 has a big following, but it's pricier than he can
afford. The
thanks walt!
G
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
I don't have it anymore, but I once owned the Sigma 70~300 APO
Super. The
latest Digital version is a little more expensive, but still very
affordable. I truly wonder what the diff is compared to the regular
version.
I don't have it anymore, but I once owned the Sigma 70~300 APO Super. The
latest Digital version is a little more expensive, but still very
affordable. I truly wonder what the diff is compared to the regular version.
Anyway, I found it to be a VG to E+ lens, especially when factoring in
price.
Godfrey,
Unfortunately, I don't have experience with either.
I've been using Tamron 70-300 4-5.6 LD/Macro that I bought
back in 1998. It is a reasonable lens. I found that the quality
of the photos is comparable to what I am getting with SMCP-F-70-210
in the same range of focal lengths.
It is
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:36:13 -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
A friend is looking for decent quality lens with a 300mm tele
capability, at least. This is out of the range of my experience in
Pentax lenses.
Anyone worked with the FA-J75-300? or the Sigma 135-400? I know the
Sigma 50-500
Thanks John!
G
On Apr 12, 2007, at 1:52 PM, John Whittingham wrote:
I've had the Sigma 135-400 APO, while not in the same league as the
50-500 it
really is quite a good lens. My main gripe with the lens was the
amount of
extension and weight transferral when zoomed, it's at least as
6 matches
Mail list logo
