RE: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-03 Thread Cesar Matamoros II
I meant when I was not working for someone. Then of course I cull through and show only the better images. There has been one time or two when they were present when I first saw the shots. I was uncomfortable showing the 'losers' along with the 'winners'. Though, both times, they were extremely

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-03 Thread Eactivist
>In a message dated 3/3/2004 4:22:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I know, however, what you and Mike mean, and again, I'm not disagreeing with the sentiment, just the order one would put it in. >cheers, frank Okay, frank, if you want RULES... 1. Always have a camera with

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-03 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Cesar Matamoros II wrote: > I usually do not show my images to anyone. Doesn't that defeat the purpose, or the main purpose, of making photographs? > I am amazed at the amount that see me as a > very good photographer. > Your chances of becoming a good photographer may be substantially diminish

RE: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-03 Thread Cesar Matamoros II
Peter, I usually do not show my images to anyone. Though there are friends who do occasionally view them. The photo clerks see them more than others do. And there is one former lurker here who has seen most of my work. I also see all that she shoots with her Pentax gear... That being said, I

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-03 Thread frank theriault
st fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:28:05 +0200 Hi! Frank, since Mike

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-03 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! Frank, since Mike Johnston does not seem to come here any more and because his response to similar question some time ago I liked the most, I'd think I repeat it in my words of course. (Man, this Leo Tolstoy's style - one sentence - three lines keeps haunting me...) Anyway, Mike's advise was

RE: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-03 Thread Cesar Matamoros II
I must disagree to some extent. In terms of the showing of images, yes we can be our worst critics. But that is more along the lines of getting rid of everything since we find fault in just about everything of ours (generally speaking). When it comes to family/friends photos though, nothing shou

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-02 Thread frank theriault
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 01:49:35 -0500 You guys sure are slow, when I said, "Have the damn camera with you" in response to that thread

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-01 Thread Eactivist
frank theriault wrote: > A couple of months ago, someone asked what our first and best piece of > advice would be for tyros. I think I said, "shoot lots". I would like to > change it to, "have a camera with you". I'm not sure if anyone else said > this (if you did, my apologies - I didn't notic

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-01 Thread graywolf
You guys sure are slow, when I said, "Have the damn camera with you" in response to that thread, everybody thought I was being silly. Now you are all agreeing with me. Oh well, at least you are learning. Of course there is something there for me to think about. 20 years ago an MX lived hanging

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-01 Thread Peter J. Alling
That's just the point Shel, I understand this all too well. I seldom make photographs of close friends/family etc.,since I cannot emotionally divorce myself, the shots all look terrible after the fact. A good photographer learns to discard the bad and keep the good. That's the most difficult

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-01 Thread ernreed2
> frank theriault wrote: > > > A couple of months ago, someone asked what our first and best piece of > > advice would be for tyros. I think I said, "shoot lots". I would like to > > change it to, "have a camera with you". I'm not sure if anyone else said > > this (if you did, my apologies - I

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-01 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Totally disagree ... most photographers are not good editors of their own work. Often they have too much emotion involved in their photographs. shel "Peter J. Alling" wrote: > > Be your own editor. > > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > >Hi Frank ... I guess that's a version of F8 and be there > >;-)

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-01 Thread Peter J. Alling
Be your own editor. Shel Belinkoff wrote: Hi Frank ... I guess that's a version of F8 and be there ;-)) But what might the second rule be? shel frank theriault wrote: A couple of months ago, someone asked what our first and best piece of advice would be for tyros. I think I said, "shoot

Re: #1 Rule in Photography-was: PAW: Above the clouds

2004-03-01 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Frank ... I guess that's a version of F8 and be there ;-)) But what might the second rule be? shel frank theriault wrote: > A couple of months ago, someone asked what our first and best piece of > advice would be for tyros. I think I said, "shoot lots". I would like to > change it to, "