On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:39 , Theodore Beilby wrote:
> Most of my aircraft in flight shots were taken with my F 100 - 300 hand held.
> Those of you who know me know that I have very shaky hands. Sometimes, I hang
> my
> monopod under the camera. I do this with the head locks loose so the monopod
On 11-04-04 2:39 PM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
Most of my aircraft in flight shots were taken with my F 100 - 300 hand held.
Those of you who know me know that I have very shaky hands. Sometimes, I hang my
monopod under the camera. I do this with the head locks loose so the monopod is
free to swing
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:05:26PM -0400, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "John Francis"
> Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
>
>
> >On Mon
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "John Francis"
Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:17:05PM -0400, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/ken
My very favorite of that sort is from a friend of mine whose friend said
to her " Why do they call in public hair when it's so private?"
ann
Bob W wrote:
[...]
I took this hand held ... with the DA 55-300... the 55-300 is very
light weight ...
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Wo
I've used a collapsed lightweight tripod that way ... using it as a grip
or bracking one of the legs on my belt ,, does seem to help
ann
Theodore Beilby wrote:
Most of my aircraft in flight shots were taken with my F 100 - 300 hand held.
Those of you who know me know that I have very shaky ha
Glad you like it , Jens... It was one of the first I took with that
lens... and I do have image stabilization, which sure helps
I love that lens - highly recommend
ann
Jens wrote:
Brilliant. Thanks for sharing, Ann.
Regards
Jens
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdm
David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:11 AM, mike wilson wrote:
On 03/04/2011 23:52, Ken Waller wrote:
I would argue that there isn't a 300mm made that is hand holdable, if you
want to take decent pictures.
I hand hold my Sigma 300 F4, and you have seen my pict
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:17:05PM -0400, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Doug Franklin"
>
> Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
>
>
> >On 2011-0
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:11:08PM +0200, mike wilson wrote:
>
> I would argue that there isn't a 300mm made that is hand holdable,
> if you want to take decent pictures.
A bit of an exaggeration.
This wouldn't be good enough for a 30x20 print, but it does OK:
http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php
[...]
>
> I took this hand held ... with the DA 55-300... the 55-300 is very
> light weight ...
> http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Works-In-Progress/More-
> Critters/15842756_6QmYN/1/1187950299_FDCdG/Large
>
> I think it passes muster or, as I said as a child (pass the mustard)
>
> ann
Oddly, I could use my old 100-300 hand held. I was just never pleased
with the results of the 300 f4.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
> Most of my aircraft in flight shots were taken with my F 100 - 300 hand held.
> Those of you who know me know that I have very shaky hand
Most of my aircraft in flight shots were taken with my F 100 - 300 hand held.
Those of you who know me know that I have very shaky hands. Sometimes, I hang
my
monopod under the camera. I do this with the head locks loose so the monopod is
free to swing if I want to go to portrait orientation. I
ller
> >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message - From: "mike wilson"
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
> >>
> >>> On 03/04/2011 11:32, Jens wrote:
> >>>
&
Thanks for sharing these photographs...
Regareds
jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Apr 4, 2011 19:06 "Matthew Hunt" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:11 AM, mike wilson
> wrote:
> > I would argue that there isn't a 300mm made that is hand holdable,
> > if you
>
yourself.
On Apr 4, 2011 20:21 "Ken Waller" wrote:
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
> - Original Message -
> From: "mike wilson"
>
> Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
>
>
> > On 03/04/2011
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
On 03/04/2011 23:52, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Origin
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin"
Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
On 2011-04-04 12:25, mike wilson wrote:
On 04/04/2011 18:57, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I took this hand held ... with the
600mm kit
in Denali.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph McAllister"
Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
On Apr 3, 2011, at 14:52 , Ken Waller wrote:
Tamron 300/2.8s are going for less than those pr
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:11 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 23:52, Ken Waller wrote:
> I would argue that there isn't a 300mm made that is hand holdable, if you
> want to take decent pictures.
I hand hold my Sigma 300 F4, and you have seen my pictures.:-)
Dave
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discu
On 2011-04-04 12:25, mike wilson wrote:
On 04/04/2011 18:57, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I took this hand held ... with the DA 55-300... the 55-300 is very light
weight ...
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Works-In-Progress/More-Critters/15842756_6QmYN/1/1187950299_FDCdG/Large
I think it pas
On 04/04/2011 18:57, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
On 03/04/2011 23:52, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
On 03/04/2011 11:32,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
On 03/04/2011 23:52, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Cho
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:11 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> I would argue that there isn't a 300mm made that is hand holdable, if you
> want to take decent pictures.
These are all DA*300/4 hand-held. And I would consider myself
handicapped a bit by shooting a K10D, which I like to keep at quite
low IS
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
>
> mike wilson wrote:
>
>> On 03/04/2011 23:52, Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Kenneth Waller
>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>>>
>>> - Origi
mike wilson wrote:
On 03/04/2011 23:52, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
On 03/04/2011 11:32, Jens wrote:
Hi list
Opinions wanted.
I
al Message - From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
On 03/04/2011 11:32, Jens wrote:
Hi list
Opinions wanted.
I have been wanting a long telphoto lens for some time. For
supplementing my FA 2.8 80-200mm.
Looking at ebay I can chose from two excellent lenses:
S
On 03/04/2011 23:52, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
On 03/04/2011 11:32, Jens wrote:
Hi list
Opinions wanted.
I have been wanting a lon
I had the M 300 4.0, i.e., no tripod mount on the lens. I just
couldn't get much use out of it and sold it. At minimum, you would
need to buy some kind of cradle to use a tripod for best results.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2011, at 14:52 , Ken Waller wr
On Apr 3, 2011, at 14:52 , Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>> Tamron 300/2.8s are going for less than those prices these days.
>
> Thats good news but you should be prepared for the extra bulk and weight of
> it over say a 300 f4.5FA. I haven't shot with the Tamron but it is defimitely
> not as hand-hold
On 2011-04-03 17:47, Ken Waller wrote:
Jens - I have had the 300mm f4.5 FA for the last 13 years IIRC, and I
highly recommend it. The major rap against it is the lack of tripod
collar, but I've found it to be a non issue. Its easy to hand hold IMO.
I got the F version specifically for the tripo
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Choosing long telephoto lens
On 03/04/2011 11:32, Jens wrote:
Hi list
Opinions wanted.
I have been wanting a long telphoto lens for some time. For sup
Jens - I have had the 300mm f4.5 FA for the last 13 years IIRC, and I highly
recommend it. The major rap against it is the lack of tripod collar, but
I've found it to be a non issue. Its easy to hand hold IMO.
I've used it in all sorts of weather, from below freezing to around 100
Degrees F wi
2011/4/3 Jens :
> Pentax DA 300mm F4 (offered to me for 750 Euros) - digital only (APS-C).
>
It really is a full frame lens though, without aperture ring it
serverly limits its use.
Depends the bodies you own..
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/
Thanks PJ.
I alreay got the M* 300 F4. It's a wonderful lens. But I want AF :-)
Regards
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Apr 3, 2011 19:22 "P. J. Alling" wrote:
> On 4/3/2011 5:32 AM, Jens wrote:
> > Hi list
> > Opinions wanted.
> > I have been wanting a long t
The cosmetics on that Tokina look amazingly like my TX interchangeable
mount Vivitar 400mm f5.6. Not a bad lens though I doubt that they share
much in the way of optics. Tokina made a lot of internal changes during
the years it was produced.
On 4/3/2011 12:04 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
Back in 200
On 4/3/2011 5:32 AM, Jens wrote:
Hi list
Opinions wanted.
I have been wanting a long telphoto lens for some time. For supplementing my FA
2.8 80-200mm.
Looking at ebay I can chose from two excellent lenses:
Sigma EX 100-300mm F4 ( perhaps 600-800 Euros)- not DG but for full frame
(still got ma
On 03/04/2011 10:04 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
Back in 2009 I developed the same itch and eventually bought a Tokina
SL-400 F5.6 on eBay. It's a total pain in the butt to work with but
there are a few things you can't photograph any other way.. A few
samples at http://www.google.com/search?as_q=tokina
Back in 2009 I developed the same itch and eventually bought a Tokina
SL-400 F5.6 on eBay. It's a total pain in the butt to work with but
there are a few things you can't photograph any other way.. A few
samples at http://www.google.com/search?as_q=tokina&as_sitesearch=tbray.org,
none of them rea
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Jens wrote:
> Looking at ebay I can chose from two excellent lenses:
> Sigma EX 100-300mm F4 ( perhaps 600-800 Euros)- not DG but for full frame
> (still got many film SLR's).
> Pentax DA 300mm F4 (offered to me for 750 Euros) - digital only (APS-C).
>
> I am lean
On 03/04/2011 11:32, Jens wrote:
Hi list
Opinions wanted.
I have been wanting a long telphoto lens for some time. For supplementing my FA
2.8 80-200mm.
Looking at ebay I can chose from two excellent lenses:
Sigma EX 100-300mm F4 ( perhaps 600-800 Euros)- not DG but for full frame
(still got ma
41 matches
Mail list logo
