The results look great. I cant help but feel that this picture has a
50's look to it. I wonder what it would look like if you "modernized"
it a bit, perhaps by bringing back the rose in color?
rg
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Ok, so you all know that I'm not shooting digital with Pentax, but
Absolutely great "save". IMO, one of the nicest benefits of shooting
digital. Now, if I could only get the *ist D to not underexpose with the
AF360FGZ.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004
Works for me.
Jeff.
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: D - Not Pentax but an interesting digital "save"...
Ok, so you all know that I'm not shooting digital with Pentax, but th
3 matches
Mail list logo
