I fond my D viewfinder to be of way beter quality than my Z1
viewfinder (which has this anoying distortion if you don't look
exactly in the middle).
On 2/28/06, Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My standard is the istD/Ds viewfinders though, which are good but
> already quite small themselv
The E-1 is as good, the E-300 probably about the same as the DL. I'm a
big viewfinder bigot, and I found them as acceptable a subframe
viewfinder as I've seen. The E-500 was just too small (unfortunately, as
it was otherwise a nicer camera than the E-300)
-Adam
Juan Buhler wrote:
My standard
My standard is the istD/Ds viewfinders though, which are good but
already quite small themselves.
j
On 2/28/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The E-500's viewfinder is tiny, but reasonably bright. The E-1 and E-300
> viewfinders are better than most APS-C sized bodies. I was playing with
The E-500's viewfinder is tiny, but reasonably bright. The E-1 and E-300
viewfinders are better than most APS-C sized bodies. I was playing with
the Oly's on monday, and found the viewfinders to be quite acceptable,
which is somthing I can't say for the Rebels or the D50/D70/D100.
-Adam
Jua
The big problem with 4/3 SLRs is that the format is so small that the
viewfinders are tiny and unusable. I prefer the 3:2 aspect ratio also,
but that's personal preference and is moot given enough resolution.
Now, if someone made a 4/3 rangefinder with a viewfinder up to Leica
or Cosina standards,
Hi!
Given the fact that 4/3 system has many adaptors, it will be rather
possible to mount limited pentax glass on leica branded body with
olympus mount.
I say it is quite swell...
--
Boris
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Bob Shell wrote on 28.02.06 14:06:
Yes.
Strange. They would have three various mounts for their digital cameras...
Anyway I guess 4/3 would be the most affordable one ;-)
What's probably going to happen is that the always poor selling R will
slowly die
Bob Shell wrote on 28.02.06 14:06:
> Yes.
Strange. They would have three various mounts for their digital cameras...
Anyway I guess 4/3 would be the most affordable one ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
8, 2006 3:07 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Leica joins FourThirds standard
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
>
> >> M Digital will have M mount.
> > Is there any official info on this?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
> Bob
On Feb 28, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
M Digital will have M mount.
Is there any official info on this?
Yes.
Bob
Bob Shell wrote on 28.02.06 13:41:
> M Digital will have M mount.
Is there any official info on this?
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
On Feb 28, 2006, at 7:02 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Now it's official. I've got the press release.
So it means that M Digital will have 4/3 mount? Seeing new
Panasonic that's
the most feasible option...
M Digital will have M mount.
Bob
Leica-rebadged Olysonic.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Leica joins FourThirds standard
Dario Bonazza wrote on 28.02.06 12:51:
Now it's official. I've go
Dario Bonazza wrote on 28.02.06 12:51:
> Now it's official. I've got the press release.
So it means that M Digital will have 4/3 mount? Seeing new Panasonic that's
the most feasible option...
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
14 matches
Mail list logo
