On Jan 9, 2011, at 18:44, Miserere wrote:
> On 9 January 2011 11:31, Charles Robinson wrote:
>> On Jan 9, 2011, at 10:21, Miserere wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 January 2011 10:44, Bob Sullivan wrote:
I took 2 rolls into my local photo shop on December 28th.
They called with the processed slides
On 9 January 2011 11:31, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2011, at 10:21, Miserere wrote:
>
>> On 9 January 2011 10:44, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>>> I took 2 rolls into my local photo shop on December 28th.
>>> They called with the processed slides on Thursday and
>>> I picked them up on Saturday,
Joe,
Some of us have film in the freezer already.
We don't need Kodak to produce more to justify processing.
I expect Dwayne's had a full few DAYS of processing to do.
They claimed last run was 12/30, but I suspect 12/30, 12/31, 1/1 and 1/2.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Joseph
On Jan 9, 2011, at 11:23 , P. J. Alling wrote:
> Now's the time to start a "Bring Back Kodachrome movement", before all the
> processing equipment is scrapped. It won't work, but any time in the future
> it will be too late.
IF you save the machine to process Kodachrome, and IF you convince s
Other than to clear film out of a couple of camera bodies, I haven't shot
film since late '04.
There's very little I miss about film and given that I'd have a computer
anyway, the economics of digital are just fine with me.
The pluses of digital far outweigh those of film (if any).
Kenneth Wal
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 10:53 -0600, "Bob Sullivan"
wrote:
> Miserere,
> I suppose I could fire up the scaner.
> But I might have to find the software first to load it on the new
> machine.
> Part of the joy of Kodachrome is in the details,
> and my scanning skills will never do it justice.
> Regards,
Now's the time to start a "Bring Back Kodachrome movement", before all
the processing equipment is scrapped. It won't work, but any time in
the future it will be too late.
On 1/9/2011 10:44 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
I took 2 rolls into my local photo shop on December 28th.
They called with the
Bob Sullivan wrote
> Sent: 09 January 2011 16:54
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: My last roll of Kodachrome
>
> Miserere,
> I suppose I could fire up the scaner.
> But I might have to find the software first to load it on the new
> machine.
> Part of the
Miserere,
I suppose I could fire up the scaner.
But I might have to find the software first to load it on the new machine.
Part of the joy of Kodachrome is in the details,
and my scanning skills will never do it justice.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Miserere wrote:
> On 9 Janu
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> I just *knew* someone was going to ask him for scans. For my money, there is
> no more-difficult film to scan than Kodachrome.
lol ... I'm scanning the roll of Ilford XP2 Super I put through the
Trip 35 and had processed yesterday. I'm u
On Jan 9, 2011, at 10:21, Miserere wrote:
> On 9 January 2011 10:44, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>> I took 2 rolls into my local photo shop on December 28th.
>> They called with the processed slides on Thursday and
>> I picked them up on Saturday, January 8th.
>>
>> I shot snow scenes with the MZ-S and
On 9 January 2011 10:44, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> I took 2 rolls into my local photo shop on December 28th.
> They called with the processed slides on Thursday and
> I picked them up on Saturday, January 8th.
>
> I shot snow scenes with the MZ-S and 77mm limited.
> Same subject matter I have been sho
12 matches
Mail list logo
