Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-18 Thread Polyhead
Its probably the daily blast down 55th ave. Its 5% grade, so i hit around 35-40mph, and it has pot holes, that I don't always miss. I think the other problem is the cranking powe rI have. I've been bmx racing since I was 12 years old, and that sport is all about cranking power. I snap chains

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-18 Thread Polyhead
It is against the wind both ways often! The george wind rips through the valley during the winter. During the day it blows east, at night it blows west, which puts me against it on the way in to work, and against it on the way home. > Yeah, right. It's uphill and against the wind - both ways.

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-17 Thread Scott Loveless
Sounds a lot like too much tension on the spokes. Adam Maas wrote: > What are you doing to your poor wheels? I'm hard on wheels (~250lbs > and not a finesse rider) and I get at least 2-3 years out of a set of > machine-built wheels. Handbuilt wheels should last until you wear > through the rim bar

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-17 Thread Adam Maas
What are you doing to your poor wheels? I'm hard on wheels (~250lbs and not a finesse rider) and I get at least 2-3 years out of a set of machine-built wheels. Handbuilt wheels should last until you wear through the rim barring accidents. My current commuter ride has 3 years on a XT/Mavic X517 comb

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-17 Thread graywolf
Well, I remember riding against the wind both ways once. 70 miles in a 35mph headwind is kind of tiring, IIRC. Graywolf Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com Blog:http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/ --- Bob Blakely wrote:

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-17 Thread Bob Blakely
Yeah, right. It's uphill and against the wind - both ways. Regards, Bob... - Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. - Original Message - From:

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-17 Thread Polyhead
> I need to rebuild the wheels on the commuter which has no problem with hills, > no > they never broke, but over 15 years the spokes have stretched (I keep tight > wheels) to the point where they come through the nipples. Yes the factory > should > have used 2mm shorter spokes but I imagine

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-17 Thread graywolf
Naw, it wouldn't. I once commuted all winter in Detroit. Everyone knew me, I as the guy with icicles in his beard. My problem has been health, hills, and local helmet law. Not much I seem to be able to do about the first. I am going to regear the 3-speed for the second. And I resent the hell o

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-17 Thread Polyhead
http://polyhead.net/coppermine/index.php?cat=8 My bmx bikes. Thinking about retiring the S&M bennett. Every tube on it has a dent, the rear triangle is a bit bent, the OG pitchfork that i rode with for years.. it didn't break but for years i had to run gobs of shims on one side to center the

RE: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-17 Thread Peter McIntosh
Polyhead said: No need to let snow stop you. If it snows, I just break out the 24" cruiser class bmx bike i race on. I keep thinking though, the new 29" stuff.. that would be sweet on the snow. I keep eyeing the new redline rigid unit, the one made from sanco cromo tubing and replacable drop ou

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-17 Thread Polyhead
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:58:39 -0500 graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am wearing my sense of humor today, luckily for you. Besides we are busy > having our first snow accumulation. I knew that would happen if I thought > about > bicycles for a bit. No need to let snow stop you. If it sno

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-16 Thread mike wilson
graywolf wrote: > I knew that would happen if I thought about > bicycles for a bit. Mark! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-16 Thread keith_w
Mark Roberts wrote: > Cotty wrote: > >> On 16/12/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>> Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we? >> >> Trust me. You do *not* want to be saying that to Graywolf. > His bed doesn't have a right side ;-) A more genteel way of saying that

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-16 Thread pnstenquist
Happy snow day, Tom. We got a foot. I'll bet you don't score quite that much. Paul -- Original message -- From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I am wearing my sense of humor today, luckily for you. Besides we are busy > having our first snow accumulation. I knew th

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-16 Thread graywolf
I am wearing my sense of humor today, luckily for you. Besides we are busy having our first snow accumulation. I knew that would happen if I thought about bicycles for a bit. My comment was somewhat tongue in cheek, but also a wee bit of bitterness over the human tendency to believe that "My wa

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-16 Thread Cotty
>>>Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we? >> >>Trust me. You do *not* want to be saying that to Graywolf. > >His bed doesn't have a right side ;-) Actually Tom doesn't sleep in a bed - you'll find him hanging upside down in the closet ! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) |

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-16 Thread Polyhead
meh, can we just drop the drama, and mail it all to me? > Tom > > I'm not sure if this is a tounge in cheek response or your serious. > > Yes most of us here are shooting digital, and yes i made what should > have been taken as a humorous response, but to say no one is > interested in film camer

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread P. J. Alling
That's not exactly true, when the bottom fell out of the film camera market I picked up most of the screw mount gear I wanted. I have a "classic" 35mm kit in screw mount, an SMCT 35mm f3.5, an SMCT 50 f1.4, and a SMCT 135 f2.5 with a Komura Telemor II 2x converter for extra reach.with two pri

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread Mark Roberts
Cotty wrote: >On 16/12/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we? > >Trust me. You do *not* want to be saying that to Graywolf. His bed doesn't have a right side ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread Bob Sullivan
Chuck, No intent to offend you. A lot of us love the old screwmount gear. The lenses remind me more of the new premium, metal "Limited" lens line. Many folks here would be happy to have them, but nobody wants to take advantage of you. We shoot with Pentax digital because the film is so cheap... ;-)

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread David Savage
On Dec 16, 2007 7:16 AM, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 16/12/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we? > > Trust me. You do *not* want to be saying that to Graywolf. Too late. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread David J Brooks
Tom I'm not sure if this is a tounge in cheek response or your serious. Yes most of us here are shooting digital, and yes i made what should have been taken as a humorous response, but to say no one is interested in film cameras is absurd. Everyone here has or still has old film cameras somewher

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread pnstenquist
A bit of silliness from Tom. But that's okay. In fact, many of us have Spotmatics. I have three and quite a few lenses as well. I just don't need another. And no, most of us don't shoot much film. And yes, many of the pics we take could have been taken with a cell phone. But so too many of the p

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread Cotty
On 16/12/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed: >Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we? Trust me. You do *not* want to be saying that to Graywolf. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com __

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "David Savage" Subject: Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear > Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we? Geeze, what brought that on? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdm

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread David Savage
Got out of the wrong side of the bed today did we? Cheers, Dave On Dec 16, 2007 6:56 AM, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can understand your feelings, you come top what claims to be a Pentax camera > list and find no one interested in Pentax cameras. It is now the "pentax > DIGITAL > ma

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread graywolf
I can understand your feelings, you come top what claims to be a Pentax camera list and find no one interested in Pentax cameras. It is now the "pentax DIGITAL mailing list", a strange place to brag about your rather ordinary snaps that could just as well have been taken with a cel-phone. Film

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread Paul Crovella
I'd use it, but I'm not close enough for a simple drop-off. Try your local schools or www.freecycle.org Cheers, Paul chuck wrote: > Really, I'd rather drop it off at a charity shop than go thru the > ebay hassles. > > Just looking to unload it on someone who would use it. > Not looking for the

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread Sandy Harris
On Dec 16, 2007 12:01 AM, chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Really, I'd rather drop it off at a charity shop than go thru the > ebay hassles. > > Just looking to unload it on someone who would use it. If you want to give it away, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on another list I subscribe to. He's a high s

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread Polyhead
Well, I would certainly use it. Right now i have my P30t ... and my P30t :/ > Really, I'd rather drop it off at a charity shop than go thru the > ebay hassles. > > Just looking to unload it on someone who would use it. > Not looking for the earth here. Sorry to be a bother > and all. > > -- >

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread David J Brooks
On Dec 15, 2007 9:46 AM, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave, > Careful now, my second biggest collection of unused equipment is > Pentax screwmount! ;-) > Regards, Bob S. Mine to Bob, it was a feeble attempt at early morning, waiting for the "big" snowstorm humour. :-) Dave > > > O

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread Bob Sullivan
Dave, Careful now, my second biggest collection of unused equipment is Pentax screwmount! ;-) Regards, Bob S. On Dec 15, 2007 8:09 AM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 11:46 PM, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chuck, > > Describe each lens like SMC Takumar

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-15 Thread David J Brooks
On Dec 14, 2007 11:46 PM, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chuck, > Describe each lens like SMC Takumar 135 f3.5 in whatever condition > with clean glass. (or Super Takumar, or...) > Add a good picture of the front and one from the side. > End the auction on a Sunday if you can... > There

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-14 Thread Bob Sullivan
Chuck, Describe each lens like SMC Takumar 135 f3.5 in whatever condition with clean glass. (or Super Takumar, or...) Add a good picture of the front and one from the side. End the auction on a Sunday if you can... There is still an active market for Pentax screwmount lenses. Regards, Bob S. On D

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-14 Thread Brian Walters
Yes, I agree with Bob. Don't put it all up as one lot - you'll get a better total price individually. As to the price you can expect, it's difficult to say. The best idea is to do a bit of searching on ebay for the same or similar items and see what they go for. There's quite a bit of Spotma

Re: Old Honeywell Pentax Gear

2007-12-14 Thread Bob Blakely
ebay. One piece at a time. Quality pics of equipment required for best price. Regards, Bob... - Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. From: "chuck" <